Humanity is on the move. Humans are living in an era of unprecedented mobility of ideas, money and, increasingly, people.
The sheer size of the human population, combined with how it consumes resources, is profoundly reshaping the world. While the “take-make-dispose” economic model has created wealth for hundreds of millions of people in many countries, reducing global poverty significantly, it has also left too many behind.
Crucially, it exposes future generations to immense social, economic and environmental risks. Perhaps the most important risk stems from filling the atmosphere with greenhouse gases at a rate greater than at any time in the past 66 million years.
Illustration: Mountain People
One billion people alive today are migrants, having moved within or beyond their national borders. They have done so for a variety of complex reasons, including population pressure, a lack of economic opportunities, environmental degradation and new forms of travel.
Combined, these factors are contributing to human displacement and unsafe migration on an unprecedented scale. The levels of both will only rise as the effects of climate change gradually erode millions of people’s livelihoods.
Climate change is fundamentally redrawing the map of where people can live. Food supplies are being disrupted in north Africa’s Sahel region and Central America, while water stress and scarcity are growing worse in north Africa and the Middle East.
For example, Somalia is experiencing more frequent droughts, Iraq is battling more frequent heat waves and unprecedented storms and floods have battered the Caribbean and Gulf of Mexico.
As the abnormal becomes the new normal, scarcities, zero-sum competition and mass displacements will become more common.
However, there is good news to report on two fronts.
First, humans are making major strides in building resilience to extreme weather. In the 1970s, Bangladesh lost hundreds of thousands of people to extreme flooding. Today, the fatalities from similar occurrences, while no less tragic, are far fewer in number. Humanity is getting better at coping with disasters.
Second, for the first time in history the international community is coming together to build a framework to manage international migration. Intergovernmental negotiations started in February with the aim of adopting a Global Compact for Safe, Orderly and Regular Migration, which the UN General Assembly last month finalized and heads of state are expected to adopt in December at a high-level conference in Marrakesh, Morocco.
The compact promises to provide a sound framework for taking action that addresses climate-driven migration, but now steps must be taken to ensure that it is implemented. It represents a once-in-a-generation opportunity to set in place an internationally-agreed system for managing safe and orderly migration. As such, it has the potential to improve the lives and prospects of tens of millions of people.
Once it is formally adopted, steps are needed to ensure that the new framework maximizes the benefits of international travel and exchange, while also addressing the concerns that many people have with unregulated migration.
Finally, and most important, everyone will have to do everything possible to reduce greenhouse gas emissions drastically. That is the only way to keep the Earth’s temperature within 2?C of preindustrial levels — the threshold at which spiraling feedback loops could trigger runaway climate change.
A recent report that atmospheric carbon dioxide now exceeds 410 parts per million should serve as a wake-up call. Humanity urgently needs to become more resource-efficient by adopting sustainable consumption and production methods and by fundamentally altering the economic model.
The window for action is quickly closing. Climate change and environmental degradation are creating unacceptable levels of human insecurity. If the environment is sustainably managed, people will have a better chance of upholding migrants’ dignity, rights and prospects.
These two goals are inseparable and global organizations are ready to support the efforts of the world’s governments to achieve them. This year presents humans with a unique opportunity to think and plan for the decades ahead by stepping up action on both migration and the environment.
As the framework to provide for safe, regular and orderly migration is established, humanity must harness its creativity to address the causes. Above all, far-sighted world leaders with the will to fix a problem that is already here, which is entirely of humanity’s own making, are needed.
Erik Solheim, a former Norwegian minister of international development and minister of the environment, is executive director of the UN Environment Programme. William Lacy Swing is director-general of the International Organization for Migration.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing