I applaud the government’s long-overdue campaign to enhance Taiwan’s international profile amid China’s bullying — a very important move that should positively affect the nation’s security.
In response to the Taipei Times article on the campaign to counter Chinese bullying, I have another idea for the advertising light boxes at international airports, which, in addition to the anti-bullying advertisements, should be quite effective at promoting Taiwan among Americans (“Publicity campaign to counter Chinese bullying,” Aug. 5, page 1).
It is laughable, but true, that some Americans tend to confuse Taiwan with Thailand. Taiwan is a high-tech hub, a fact unbeknownst to most ordinary Americans.
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co is the world’s largest contract chipmaker, providing components for Apple’s iPhones. Simply by creating the awareness that their beloved iPhones contain Taiwanese components is, by itself, an effective means of making Americans recognize Taiwan.
So why not have an additional light-box advertisement that is tailored to make people aware of Taiwan’s prowess in the high-tech industry and, in particular, Taiwan’s relationship with the iPhone?
Such information affects people’s daily lives, so they should notice it more.
Separately, I propose a grass-roots campaign to educate ordinary people in the US about Taiwan. Most Americans know very little about Taiwan. This is simply because US news sources seldom share information about Taiwan.
What is the reason? Well, people anywhere in the world are naturally more interested in affairs that directly affect them, so news about foreign countries tends to be underreported, especially Asian countries.
Remedial action is sorely needed, and that requires creative thinking and proactive measures.
I say sorely needed, because Taiwan’s expatriates in the US or elsewhere who care about Taiwan — and there are countless people who care immensely — are not channeling even some of their efforts to informing the US public about Taiwan.
English is not our mother tongue, which is the main barrier. Many expats, even those with doctorates, are somewhat deficient in spoken or written English. Thus, we tend to shy away from engaging in in-depth discussions about Taiwan with our US friends — especially on political issues related to Taiwan and China, because more sophisticated English is needed to effectively facilitate such discussions.
Neither do many of us write or respond to media outlets, of which there are many.
These problems are exacerbated by the convenience of the Internet, as expats tend to spend most of their spare time on Chinese-language news sites and less time on US news sources. The result is that most expats do not have first-hand knowledge of the political nuances of the country in which they reside.
So what is the remedy?
There are many regional Taiwanese associations in the US and elsewhere. These associations need to encourage their members to allocate more of their spare time to viewing or listening to US news outlets, and to write in or respond when appropriate. If people feel that their English is substandard, they can have their children edit it.
This needs to be “mandated” with a strong message from the leader of the association, in order to push Taiwanese out of their comfort zones — not just by a haphazard announcement.
The first priority should be to write or respond to local newspapers, which actually reach more Americans and have more relaxed standards regarding what is published.
The government should distribute letter templates to associations to send to their members for revision or to adapt to local interests.
If one so desired or was confident enough, one could always write to the New York Times, the Washington Post, the Wall Street Journal, the Hill, The New American, Politico, the Guardian, Bloomberg News or the Democrat. However, experts who coordinate with the government are probably more effective at writing to prestigious news outlets.
Talk radio is another option, as people can respond by calling in. There are countless call-in radio shows, both liberal and conservative, in the US. The two most listened to conservative talk radio hosts, who each have tens of millions of listeners, are Sean Hannity and Rush Limbaugh.
However, be aware that talk radio shows are only interested in domestic politics. So, one has to be prepared to talk about US politics, but with the intent of inconspicuously linking something about Taiwan to your chosen domestic topic.
From my experience, many Americans who call in have a pretty bad command of English, so do not be embarrassed, just write down what you want to say and recite it. You have less than a minute to talk anyway.
Another very convenient option is C-SPAN’s Washington Journal. The TV program consists of two segments. The first segment has a host and a guest who starts by talking about their field of expertise. Viewers can then call in and ask the guest questions.
The second segment has just the host, and viewers can essentially opine about any topic they choose, mostly without any feedback from the host. The allocated time for viewers to talk is usually less than a minute. So again, one could write down what one wants to say, and then recite it.
The C-span Web site displays the topics for the following day, if one wanted to prepare in advance. Topics on foreign policy or national security would be good options.
If the government so chooses, short essays on talking points could be drawn up and distributed to Taiwanese associations to push and assist expats to act.
Chin B. Su is professor emeritus of electrical and computer engineering at Texas A&M University in College Station, Texas. The opinions expressed in this article are his own.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath