Bashing education useless
After reading G.C. Allan’s letter to the editor, I was torn between whether to agree or disagree with the author’s point of view (Letter, July 20, page 8).
Allan begins with the niceties that most people, including Taiwanese, like to hear from visitors by mentioning Taiwan as “a country full of warmth and hospitality,” but then pulls no punches when it comes to his opinion of Taiwan’s English education system and its people’s command of the language.
Having lived and worked in Taiwan for 15 years, I understand his views. I have seen my fair share of foibles when it comes to Taiwan’s public display and use of the English language.
Yes, Taiwan can do better in terms of how English materials, brochures and signage gets presented to foreigners either living in or visiting the nation. Still, is there really a need to continually bash Taiwan for its efforts? Language acquisition is an incremental process.
Allan rightfully claims education in the West and education in Taiwan have differences.
In my English essay writing class of 20 students at a university in southern Taiwan, which, when I began teaching there many years ago, had 55 students enrolled in the course, I have used materials pointing out such differences to my students.
I have also advocated in class and while presenting at conferences the need for guided self-selected silent reading with the aim of promoting free voluntary reading in Taiwan.
However, pointing out problems without making clear suggestions on how the issue could be rectified, as Allan seems to have done, sounds like sour grapes to me.
English is not Taiwan’s native or even official second language. Foreigners visiting and living in Taiwan need to remember this.
I agree that the English education system within Taiwan’s schools should continue to reform.
Rather than rely on outdated teacher-centered models, memorization of materials, overemphasis on testing and a reliance on bushibans, to fix the problem, if Taiwan’s Ministry of Education would instead focus on implementing experimentally-proven second-language acquisition concepts such as Stephen Krashen’s “comprehension hypothesis” and more recently the “conduit hypothesis,” including Beniko Mason’s “story listening,” English language proficiency in Taiwan could become even better than it already is.
Pointing out that there is room for improvement is fine, but bashing the English education system in Taiwan gets us nowhere.
Ken Smith
Wellington, New Zealand
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath