Outside a samosa stall in Lahore, the hometown of Imran Khan, a group of Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) supporters put down their forks to recall the glories of the 1992 Cricket World Cup, when the final wicket fell like a matchstick before the fast bowling of the team captain.
“He was like a tiger,” Imran Raja said.
“I watch it all the time on YouTube,” chips in 21-year-old Hassan, mourning that he was not alive to see Khan lift the trophy.
Illustration: Mountain People
On July 25, Pakistan holds a general election in which Khan, who founded the PTI in 1996 and goes by the nickname “Captain,” stands a good chance of a still more significant victory.
Posters bearing the party logo, a bat and ball, deck the streets of Lahore.
In language typical of a 65-year-old who has transferred boundless energy to the electoral field, Khan warned party workers “not to stop until the final ball” at a gathering in the city on Thursday last week.
Although polls show Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N) retaining a lead, most analysts predict that a combination of a spate of defections, court cases and pressure from the military establishment would likely deny the party a second consecutive term.
Families are split.
Parked in their car on a side-street in the Lahore constituency Khan is contesting, Mehreen leans over her husband, Yasser, a PML-N supporter, to shout through the window: “Imran Khan is the only hope for Pakistan.”
Regardless of who wins, difficulties loom.
Pakistan’s economy is teetering and is likely to require a bailout from the IMF after the current-account deficit doubled this year.
An international money laundering watchdog put Pakistan back on its “gray list,” indicating insufficient efforts to combat financing of terrorism, and a financial slowdown could reduce the leeway to protect the nation from a water crisis, or bolster decrepit hospitals and schools.
Since returning from England in 2006, Khan has worked hard to shed the playboy reputation of his cricket career.
Then, he was married to heiress Jemima Goldsmith and posed in his briefs for the Daily Mirror.
Today he wears the shalwar kameez (trousers and tunic), flicks prayer beads through his fingers and in January wed his spiritual adviser, Burshra Maneka.
However, in the eyes of his supporters his credibility lies in his clean fingers.
Khan is a philanthropist who has set up three cutting-edge cancer hospitals — his financial probity stands in contrast to PML-N founder, Nawaz Sharif, and his family, who are facing trial for money laundering.
They have pleaded not guilty and deny any wrongdoing.
It was Khan’s dogged campaigning that forced the Pakistani Supreme Court to take up the “Panama Papers” case last year, a move which led to Sharif’s ousting as prime minister.
“Khan is an honest man,” said Raheel Malik, a 40-year-old IT worker. “He should get a chance to put into practice what he is saying.”
Yet the PTI chairman appears less confident than he did in the buildup to the last election.
“If you look at the campaign, the PTI hasn’t resonated as it did in 2013” when it grabbed the votes of the young and middle class to become the nation’s second-largest party by votes, TV host Fasi Zaka said.
That partly comes down to the compromises Khan has made on the way.
For the past two weeks, long-standing party members have protested outside Khan’s lavish homes in Islamabad and Lahore, furious at being denied tickets to run for the election in favor of “electables,” politicians who switch parties with the wind and bring their own vote-banks — and often corruption scandals — with them.
Unlike five years ago, when the party promised to transform health and education, and brought in a new cadre of untested politicians, this time Khan admitted: “We have only one strategy: defeat the Noon-league [PML-N].”
The more wizened observers of Pakistani politics argue that picking up “electables” is the only route to power in the crucial province of Punjab, dominated by the PML-N for the past 30 years.
“You need the right horses,” said 23-year-old Saeed Zaman, a volunteer in the constituency Khan is contesting.
Others feel that by bringing in one-third of its candidates from other parties, the PTI has lost its appeal as a purgatory force.
“How can Imran Khan’s laundry wash their sins clean?” said Muhammad Asghar, 60, who added that he would no longer vote for the party.
Hopes that Khan could deliver the promised “new Pakistan” have also suffered somewhat from the record of his five-year government in the northern province of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa.
The delivery of health insurance to 1 million poor families, improvement in public hospitals and removal of political interference in the police draw some recognition from voters, but expectations — whipped into the stratosphere during the election campaign — have not been met.
Khan has also lost former allies in the elite.
“Feminists and liberals are quite shocked that he is still treated by some as a progressive leader,” said Ashaar Rehman, the Lahore editor of the Dawn newspaper.
Khan calls liberals “blood-suckers” for supporting the war against the Pakistani Taliban, which he opposes in favor of negotiation.
His provincial government granted US$30,000 to the madrasah of Sami-ul Haq, a notorious front for Taliban fighters (in return Sami-ul Haq has formed an alliance with the PTI).
Similarly damaging is the impression of complicity with military-backed efforts to interfere in the election.
Khan has not spoken out as journalists have been abducted, TV stations taken off air, and Dawn’s distribution blocked in some areas.
“He enjoys the rumors of establishment support,” consultant Umair Javed said. “His understanding of Punjab politics is that he is much more likely to do well if people believe the army is behind him.”
Still, Khan has a hot-headed, independent streak that unnerves the military leadership.
In a sign of his sympathy for the Pashtun Protection Movement, a civil rights movement that claims the army supports the Taliban, Khan is not running candidates against its leaders in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa.
In an interview with the Guardian, he said that the famous “umpires” of Pakistani politics would step back if he took power, just as he ensured neutral umpires in cricket matches against India in 1987.
Whether, like so many other civilian leaders, he is eventually stumped by the military, only time will tell.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath