The Merriam-Webster online dictionary defines “status quo” as “the existing state of affairs.”
US Secretary of Defense James Mattis knows what it means.
The former general on June 2 said at the annual Shangri-La Dialogue in Singapore that “we oppose all unilateral efforts to alter the ‘status quo’ [in the Taiwan Strait] and will continue to insist any resolution of differences accord with the wishes of the people on both sides of the Taiwan Strait.”
Three weeks later, US Department of State Bureau of East Asian and Pacific Affairs Deputy Assistant Secretary Alex Wong (黃之瀚) said at a conference hosted by a Washington think tank that “stability in the region is dependent on the ‘status quo’ across the Strait. So, the US government is very concerned about any attempts to disturb that ‘status quo.’”
China has been changing the ‘status quo’ in the Taiwan Strait over the past decades — to a large extent — and Taiwan has not.
First and foremost, China’s 2005 “Anti-Secession” Law comes to mind. It enshrined into law China’s determination to use “non-peaceful means” as a last resort to prevent Taiwan from establishing formal independence.
The law resurfaced in the news when Chinese diplomat Li Kexin (李克新) warned Washington in December last year that Beijing could activate the law if the US sent navy vessels to Taiwan, in response to the passage by the US Congress of the 2018 National Defense Authorization Act in September. The act authorizes Taiwanese and US naval vessels visiting each other’s ports.
Furthermore, when Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) came to power seven years after the law’s implementation, he promulgated the “Chinese Dream,” calling for “the great rejuvenation of the Chinese nation,” with the specific target of “two centennial goals,” at the 19th Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Congress.
During his speech, Xi identified the annexation of Taiwan as a major component, saying that any attempts at “separatism” would face “the punishment of history.”
He also hinted that China must take control of Taiwan by 2050.
More recently, China has conducted numerous long-range military live-fire drills in the Taiwan Strait; sent bombers flying over major waterways around Taiwan; dispatched warships that trespassed into Taiwan’s territorial waters; and in January unilaterally launched a new aviation corridor over the Taiwan Strait.
On the diplomatic front, China this year poached two of Taiwan’s diplomatic allies — the Dominican Republic and Burkina Faso — within a month and is spreading its tentacles toward the Vatican — Taiwan’s only diplomatic ally in Europe.
Additionally, China is involving the rest of the world in its attempts to change the “status quo.”
It has bullied dozens of major international airlines into referring to Taiwan as “Taiwan, China.” Many international corporations, such as Marriot International, Gap and Zara followed suit.
The CCP utilizes its United Front Work Department in its international campaign to bully Taiwan. Department members, who are Chinese agents pretending to be Taiwanese netizens, infiltrate Taiwanese online forums and influence public opinion.
Mobs and gangsters in Taiwan also serve as proxies of the CCP, creating chaos and undertaking violent acts against people who stand for Taiwan’s right to self-determination.
Threats and intimidation to peace in the region are becoming more frequent and rampant. Isolation, intimidation and sowing internal division are the three major weapons China uses to challenge the peace and stability in the Taiwan Strait.
In these volatile times, US values of freedom, human rights, democracy and liberty must be preserved. The US cannot stand aside as China expands its authoritative power in the Asia-Pacific region. It must apply an even more assertive approach toward the continuing rise of China.
On May 30, at a seminar hosted by the Brookings Institution, former American Institute in Taiwan chairman Richard Bush said that he would like to see “a very senior official in the United States, whether it’s the president or the secretary of state or the secretary of defense, say to their counterpart in China: ‘We are not trying to change the status quo. Taiwan is not trying to change the status quo. You are trying to change the status quo.’”
Bush is of course right. The time is now for US President Donald Trump, US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, Mattis and other US officials to read the Chinese the riot act when it comes to the “status quo” in the Taiwan Strait.
The time is now for the US to speak out without inhibitions.
Mike Kuo is president of the Formosan Association for Public Affairs.
In the US’ National Security Strategy (NSS) report released last month, US President Donald Trump offered his interpretation of the Monroe Doctrine. The “Trump Corollary,” presented on page 15, is a distinctly aggressive rebranding of the more than 200-year-old foreign policy position. Beyond reasserting the sovereignty of the western hemisphere against foreign intervention, the document centers on energy and strategic assets, and attempts to redraw the map of the geopolitical landscape more broadly. It is clear that Trump no longer sees the western hemisphere as a peaceful backyard, but rather as the frontier of a new Cold War. In particular,
When it became clear that the world was entering a new era with a radical change in the US’ global stance in US President Donald Trump’s second term, many in Taiwan were concerned about what this meant for the nation’s defense against China. Instability and disruption are dangerous. Chaos introduces unknowns. There was a sense that the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) might have a point with its tendency not to trust the US. The world order is certainly changing, but concerns about the implications for Taiwan of this disruption left many blind to how the same forces might also weaken
As the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) races toward its 2027 modernization goals, most analysts fixate on ship counts, missile ranges and artificial intelligence. Those metrics matter — but they obscure a deeper vulnerability. The true future of the PLA, and by extension Taiwan’s security, might hinge less on hardware than on whether the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) can preserve ideological loyalty inside its own armed forces. Iran’s 1979 revolution demonstrated how even a technologically advanced military can collapse when the social environment surrounding it shifts. That lesson has renewed relevance as fresh unrest shakes Iran today — and it should
As the new year dawns, Taiwan faces a range of external uncertainties that could impact the safety and prosperity of its people and reverberate in its politics. Here are a few key questions that could spill over into Taiwan in the year ahead. WILL THE AI BUBBLE POP? The global AI boom supported Taiwan’s significant economic expansion in 2025. Taiwan’s economy grew over 7 percent and set records for exports, imports, and trade surplus. There is a brewing debate among investors about whether the AI boom will carry forward into 2026. Skeptics warn that AI-led global equity markets are overvalued and overleveraged
RSS