The summit between US President Donald Trump and North Korean leader Kim Jong-un finally went ahead last week. The buildup to the meeting had the whole world on tenterhooks. Its touted “success” will bring necessary change to East Asia, something that the history of the region makes inevitable.
Since China’s Asia Infrastructure Investment Bank was launched in 2016, the US has suffered a series of catastrophic blows to its political and economic prestige. After former US president Barack Obama lost face at the hands of Beijing, the situation began to shift in Taiwan’s favor.
Contrary to received wisdom from the pro-unification camp, time is on Taiwan’s side, not China’s, and there is cause for increasing optimism over Taiwan’s status and security.
The Trump-Kim meeting was proof that the heavens are looking kindly on Taiwan, which is about to turn from Asia’s dusty pearl into a shining diamond.
Here are five reasons for this optimism:
First, during the summit, Kim said: “The world will see a major change.”
His decision to forgo nuclear weapons is likely to extinguish a fragile tinderbox in northeast Asia, to the benefit of many countries in the region. The biggest beneficiary would be the US.
In addition to eliminating the specter of nuclear war, Trump announced that the US would end joint military exercises with South Korea, and that he might even consider withdrawing US troops from South Korea.
Japan would also benefit: Aside from the nuclear missile threat being removed, Tokyo could establish diplomatic relations with Pyongyang and benefit economically, while South Korea could build on its dream of uniting the two Koreas.
Second, defusing the northeast Asian powder keg would allow the US and Japan to stabilize the first island chain and the Taiwan Strait. In the past, Washington viewed North Korea as northeast Asia’s most volatile powder keg. If relations with Pyongyang continue to warm, Washington’s focus in the region would turn to the Taiwan Strait and the South China Sea. Similarly, if the North Korea situation settles, Tokyo’s only concern would be the Senkaku Islands (Diaoyutai, 釣魚台), allowing it to focus more on security in the Taiwan Strait.
Third, Beijing might be unhappy with the detente between Washington and Pyongyang, as playing the North Korea card would no longer work. Beijing would have to prevent Pyongyang from building closer ties with the US, because Kim is not pro-China. Having been exposed to Western culture from a young age, this influence runs deep, and he might even feel closer to the US and Japan than South Korea does. If so, China might focus economically and diplomatically on South Korea.
Fourth, Taiwan has maintained reasonably good relations with North Korea and, after the Trump-Kim summit, relations could warm further. Due to its relationship with Beijing, Pyongyang is unlikely to quickly develop relations with Taiwan, but this would be normal.
Fifth, from Washington’s and Tokyo’s perspective, Taiwan is the jewel in the crown of the first island chain, and a high-tech manufacturing base that they cannot afford to fall into China’s hands. China dreams of breaking through the first island chain. If it can conquer Taiwan, it has effectively conquered Okinawa and maybe even all of Japan.
Beijing’s “Chinese dream” is a tragedy for humanity, and as the wheel of history turns rapidly toward the South China Sea and Taiwan, the Trump-Kim summit offers a major opportunity.
Huang Tien-lin is a national policy adviser, former advisory member of the National Security Council and a former managing director and chairman of First Commercial Bank.
Translated by Edward Jones
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath