Organizations supporting migrant workers have been organizing rallies in front of the Ministry of Labor, while there have been op-ed submissions printed in the Taipei Times, all calling on employers to grant migrant caretakers one whole day off every seven days.
While these demands sound reasonable, these organizations are not telling the public the whole truth, because they are promoting their own interests.
They make specious accusations, resulting in the misunderstanding that employers are treating migrant workers harshly by not allowing them to take days off and not paying them overtime.
These accusations are not true and depict Taiwan as a country where migrant workers are mistreated.
To defend Taiwanese employers against these unfounded allegations and to help the ministry get rid of the constant interference from migrant worker advocates, it is necessary to disclose the truth.
This is the only way to solve the issue once and for all, and to do justice to employers, whose treatment of migrant workers ranks among the best in the world.
The monthly wage paid to foreign caregivers in Taiwan is NT$17,000, which is higher than the equivalent in Hong Kong of about NT$15,000, NT$12,000 in Middle Eastern countries, and NT$15,000 in Singapore.
Normally, the employment contracts signed by both parties stipulate that caregivers receive four days off for every month, which is equal to one day off every seven days. If the days are not taken, the employer must pay overtime for the four days.
The monthly wage for the same job in the migrant workers’ home countries is about NT$1,500, which means that they would have to work for one year to earn as much as they do in Taiwan in one month. Their NT$2,200 overtime pay for four days off exceeds the monthly income in their home countries.
When recruiting foreign caregivers from their home countries, Taiwanese employers must subsidize their training in Taiwan — which ranges between NT$10,000 and NT$20,000 — and declare that they will pay overtime pay for four days of leave.
An employer has to pay a monthly wage of NT$19,000 plus health insurance fees if they want to hire a foreign worker.
After foreign workers arrive in Taiwan and start working, most employers grant them at least one day off every month, while still paying them four days of overtime.
This is the whole context. If this is mistreating migrant workers, what are other countries doing so much better?
Most employers of foreign caregivers are underprivileged and economically disadvantaged families with elderly or challenged family members that need care.
They are struggling daily to make ends meet, and they are hardly capable of responding to the allegations from migrant workers’ rights groups.
Hopefully, this detailed explanation helps to do justice to employers and the ministry will take these underprivileged families into consideration when drafting amendments to the relevant legislation, making Taiwan a true model nation for human rights.
Steve Kuan is a former chairman of the Taipei and New Taipei City Employment Service Institute Association.
Translated by Chang Ho-ming
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath