A sign of the increasing cooperation between Taiwanese military and defense officials and their US counterparts was the presence of two senior Taiwanese officers at the change of command ceremony for the US Pacific Command in Hawaii on Wednesday.
A sign of the continued sensitivity of such ties was that the government has not publicly identified the pair, although Administrative Deputy Minister of Defense Lieutenant General Shen Yi-ming (沈一鳴) was seen in a live stream of the event on the command’s Facebook page, and Chinese-language media reports have said that Chief of General Staff Admiral Lee Hsi-ming (李喜明) was the other.
The ceremony at Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam was to mark the handover of the command from Admiral Harry Harris to Admiral Phil Davidson, and Harris’ retirement from the US Navy. Harris has been nominated by US President Donald Trump to be the next US ambassador to South Korea.
US Secretary of Defense James Mattis announced at the ceremony that the command has been formally renamed the US Indo-Pacific Command in recognition of the “increasing connectivity of the Indian and Pacific Oceans,” adding that it is the US’ “primary combatant command.”
In their speeches, Harris and Davidson emphasized that the command’s mission was to ensure security and stability “from the coast of Africa to the coast of California and all points between,” a US Department of Defense news release said.
The two members of Taiwan’s top brass were part of a large international contingent that included representatives from Canada, Japan, Australia, the UK, the Philippines, Thailand and at least six more Asian nations.
Chinese representatives might not have been on hand, but Beijing’s military ambitions were mentioned by Davidson, who reaffirmed the US’ commitment to ensure freedom of the seas and skies, echoing comments his boss made the day before.
Mattis had told reporters en route to Honolulu that the US would continue to confront Beijing’s militarization of the artificial islands it has built atop several reefs in the Spratly Islands (Nansha Islands, 南沙群島), because it has not kept its promise not to put weapons on those islands. Those actions led the US last week to rescind its invitation to China to take part in the Rim of the Pacific Exercise (RIMPAC), held every two years in June and July near Hawaii.
Mattis added that “only one country” appears bothered by the US Navy’s exercise of freedom of navigation in accordance with international law. He did not give a name, because he did not need to.
Beijing’s South China Sea activities are expected to be among the hotly discussed topics at the three-day Asia Security Summit, which opened in Singapore yesterday with Mattis, his counterparts and defense officials from about 40 nations in attendance.
He is scheduled to give a talk this morning on “US leadership and the challenges of Indo-Pacific security,” while senior officers in the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) will be among the speakers at afternoon sessions, including one on “managing competition in regional security cooperation” and one on “strategic implications of military capability development in the Asia-Pacific.”
While Beijing sent a low-level delegation to this year’s conference, led by the vice president of the PLA’s Academy of Military Science, it will still be interesting to see the response to their comments.
However, cynics will surely agree that it was no coincidence that a day after the Hawaii ceremony and the eve of the Singapore meeting, Chinese Ministry of National Defense spokesman Ren Guoqiang (任國強) announced that China’s carrier group, led by the Liaoning, had reached “initial” combat readiness after carrying out successful training missions that included system combat capability.
While there has been a lot of focus domestically on whether China’s exclusion from this year’s RIMPAC might increase the odds of Taiwan being asked, the comments made by US officials before and after Wednesday’s ceremony are a reminder that Taiwan is not alone in feeling threatened by China’s aggressive posturing.
What began on Feb. 28 as a military campaign against Iran quickly became the largest energy-supply disruption in modern times. Unlike the oil crises of the 1970s, which stemmed from producer-led embargoes, US President Donald Trump is the first leader in modern history to trigger a cascading global energy crisis through direct military action. In the process, Trump has also laid bare Taiwan’s strategic and economic fragilities, offering Beijing a real-time tutorial in how to exploit them. Repairing the damage to Persian Gulf oil and gas infrastructure could take years, suggesting that elevated energy prices are likely to persist. But the most
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文), during an interview for the podcast Lanshuan Time (蘭萱時間) released on Monday, said that a US professor had said that she deserved to be nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize following her meeting earlier this month with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平). Cheng’s “journey of peace” has garnered attention from overseas and from within Taiwan. The latest My Formosa poll, conducted last week after the Cheng-Xi meeting, shows that Cheng’s approval rating is 31.5 percent, up 7.6 percentage points compared with the month before. The same poll showed that 44.5 percent of respondents
Taiwan should reject two flawed answers to the Eswatini controversy: that diplomatic allies no longer matter, or that they must be preserved at any cost. The sustainable answer is to maintain formal diplomatic relations while redesigning development relationships around transparency, local ownership and democratic accountability. President William Lai’s (賴清德) canceled trip to Eswatini has elicited two predictable reactions in Taiwan. One camp has argued that the episode proves Taiwan must double down on support for every remaining diplomatic ally, because Beijing is tightening the screws, and formal recognition is too scarce to risk. The other says the opposite: If maintaining
India’s semiconductor strategy is undergoing a quiet, but significant, recalibration. With the rollout of India Semiconductor Mission (ISM) 2.0, New Delhi is signaling a shift away from ambition-driven leaps toward a more grounded, capability-led approach rooted in industrial realities and institutional learning. Rather than attempting to enter the most advanced nodes immediately, India has chosen to prioritize mature technologies in the 28-nanometer to 65-nanometer range. That would not be a retreat, but a strategic alignment with domestic capabilities, market demand and global supply chain gaps. The shift carries the imprimatur of Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, indicating that the recalibration is
RSS