What does the world do about US President Donald Trump, the most erratic, egocentric and compromised US president ever to hold office? Trade war or no trade war? Summit or no summit with North Korea? Is NATO obsolete or relevant? Military or no military involvement in the Middle East?
The US remains the overwhelmingly predominant economic, military and financial force on the planet. For 70 years, it has sustained a world order that, whatever its downsides, was at least an order with predictable patterns of international behavior, along with a bias to openness, trade and peace. Suddenly it is all up in the air.
For the West’s enemies and critics, the new chaos is welcome.
Russia President Vladimir Putin and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) are united in their view that the postwar order was a victor’s order, organized to suit US interests and from which it has benefited hugely.
China chafes under the supremacy of the US dollar, the US’ network of military bases, its dominance of the great international institutions and the way global trade and financial flows center on the US.
Russia still smarts from how the ring of satellite countries that constituted the Soviet Union have since detached themselves from Russian influence.
Putin wants to level the score — witness his invasion of Crimea, his siege of Ukraine (involving, we now learn, the Russian shooting down of flight MH17, killing all 298 passengers) and his armies massing on the frontiers of the Baltic republics.
Both see yet more opportunities spinning out of Trump’s incredible stupidity in deliberately destabilizing the very system from which the US benefits so much. His waywardness is offering the chance to create new Russian and Chinese spheres of influence.
China is being given the chance to dominate Asia, Russia the chance to recreate the Soviet Union’s influence in its old borderlands, and both can do it while talking the language of peace and respect for obvious global menaces such as climate change.
Has a bigger fool ever occupied the White House?
In Trumpland, however, both he and his “ base” see themselves as advancing America first. It is a universe that has created its own hermetically sealed reality.
Trump’s long, rambling folksy speeches at his rallies — he uses “folks” a lot, diving into eccentric diversions at enormous length — are bound together by a combination of paranoia, vanity, prejudice and jokiness that is as curiously compelling as it is bonkers.
However, the unifying theme is that life is a zero-sum game: There are never gains from collaboration, no virtue in sharing and no value in anything but asserting your own will — with a gun, with a checkbook or with a missile.
Give no quarter, look for the other side’s weakness and brutally cut the deal to walk away taller and prouder yourself.
Trump’s fights and deals may reward the rich, but many of the disenfranchised rally to the philosophy of uncompromising self-assertion. It is potent and it is dangerous.
Thus the twists and turns in US foreign policy. Iran has to be seen to kowtow to US will. Palestinians must accept the new Middle Eastern reality: There will be a US embassy in Jerusalem. Thus China is threatened with swingeing tariffs to be suspended only after it blinks first.
NATO is tolerated because members are increasing defense spending as demanded. The US will only re-enter the Paris climate change accords if the world reshapes it wholly to accommodate US interests. North Korea must overtly bend to US will if there is to be a summit.
Foreign policy has become a series of zero-sum games: The US has to win each one.
This may work with Trump’s base — but it is a ludicrous way for the superpower to behave. For a start, it abandons any attempt to sustain world affairs systemically around a coherent set of shared principles or maintain the US’ leading role in its varying alliances.
The world system, based on the US dollar, Pax Americana and economic openness, is the foundation not only of global trade growth and prosperity since World War II, but also of the US’ own economic model; it is why its high-tech multinationals, rather than China’s, are world actors.
By undermining the system, Trump will lose the benefits of systemic gain for tiny wins — and often not even for those.
Furthermore, it fragments the entire alliance network — and legitimizes Russia and China. Thus Russia and the Europeans are acting in concert to sustain the Iranian denuclearization deal.
The EU is refusing a transatlantic trade deal until the US recommits to the Paris climate change agreement, with China and Russia positioning themselves as on the side of the angels.
China might increase its purchases of US soya bean and oil — the reason why the trade war was suspended — but it is hardly worth endangering the world trade system.
Meanwhile, it encourages Asian countries to sign up for China’s Belt and Road initiative, trade sphere and Asian bank.
Worse, it makes everyone else adopt the same dog-eat-dog value system.
The lesson of history is unambiguous. When the international system becomes a cockpit for economic, trade and national rivalry, armed conflict becomes more likely. Trump and the incompetent ideologues around him may welcome that: Nobody else does.
The best response is to show no weakness and stand up to him, as French President Emmanuel Macron and German Chancellor Angela Merkel do — and try to keep what is left of the international system together until eventually Trump is either impeached or voted out of office.
However, Macron and Merkel have the power of the EU behind them, itself now the world’s best and most powerful custodian of a rules-based international system.
Britain is a weakened onlooker — a flyblown lion unable to muster more than a whimper. Our capacity is reduced by Brexit, just as we — and the world — need so much more.
Late last month, Beijing introduced changes to school curricula in the Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, requiring certain subjects to be taught in Mandarin rather than Mongolian. What is Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) seeking to gain from sending this message of pernicious intent? It is possible that he is attempting cultural genocide in Inner Mongolia, but does Xi also have the same plan for the democratic, independent nation of Mongolia? The controversy emerged with the announcement by the Inner Mongolia Education Bureau on Aug. 26 that first-grade elementary-school and junior-high students would in certain subjects start learning with Chinese-language textbooks, as
There are worrying signs that China is on the brink of a major food shortage, which might trigger a strategic contest over food security and push Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), already under intense pressure, toward drastic measures, potentially spelling trouble for Taiwan and the rest of the world. China has encountered a perfect storm of disasters this year. On top of disruption due to the COVID-19 pandemic, torrential rains have caused catastrophic flooding in the Yangtze River basin, China’s largest agricultural region. Floodwaters are estimated to have already destroyed the crops on 6 million hectares of farmland. The situation has been
The restructuring of supply chains, particularly in the semiconductor industry, was an essential part of discussions last week between Taiwan and a US delegation led by US Undersecretary of State for Economic Growth, Energy and the Environment Keith Krach. It took precedent over the highly anticipated subject of bilateral trade partnerships, and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) founder Morris Chang’s (張忠謀) appearance on Friday at a dinner hosted by President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) for Krach was a subtle indicator of this. Chang was in photographs posted by Tsai on Facebook after the dinner, but no details about their discussions were disclosed. With
On Sept. 8, at the high-profile Ketagalan security forum, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) urged countries to deal with the China challenge. She said: “It is time for like-minded countries, and democratic friends in the Indo-Pacific region and beyond, to discuss a framework to generate sustained and concerted efforts to maintain a strategic order that deters unilateral aggressive actions.” The “Taiwan model” to deal with the COVID-19 pandemic provides an alternative to China’s authoritarian way of handling it. Taiwan’s response to the health crisis has made it evident that countries across the world have much to learn from Taiwan’s best practices and if