With all the drama this week about the will-they-won’t-they US-North Korea summit and then Thursday’s diplomatic tragedy for Taiwan, many people might have missed a story that has received a lot of play internationally this week; one that has ominous implications for Taiwanese:
A judge in China’s Qinghai Province sentenced Tibetan shopkeeper-turned-involuntary-language activist Tashi Wangchuk to five years in prison for inciting separatism.
All Tashi wanted to do in the beginning was find a Tibetan language tutor for his niece.
His real crime was talking about Beijing’s restrictions on Tibetan culture and language and his efforts to ensure that the Tibetan language would continue to be used in local schools to the New York Times in 2016, which ran a story and video featuring him.
The video followed Tashi on a trip to Beijing, where he tried to file a lawsuit against local officials back home for contravening China’s constitution, specifically the portion that states that all ethnic groups in the country have the “freedom to use and develop” their own spoken and written languages.
While the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) likes to promote its inclusiveness when it comes to the more than 50 ethnic minorities in China, trotting out dance and culture troupes from the various communities for foreign visitors or having delegates to the annual National People’s Congress dress in their traditional costumes, and it is forever claiming that the rights and interests of these myriad of peoples are protected by the Chinese constitution, the truth is far different.
The CCP in words and deeds acts to ensure the supremacy of the Han majority, insisting that their culture and language are the true bedrock of China, and, over the decades, it has worked to ensure that Mandarin is the primary language of the nation. It also insists that its efforts are helping to “modernize” all these poor benighted minorities.
This has been especially true in Tibet, and areas that were formerly part of Tibet, but were incorporated into what is now Qinghai by the then-Republic of China government or into Sichuan Province by the People’s Republic of China, as well as Xinjiang Province, where the Muslim Uighurs have Beijing’s cadres seeing Islamic militants behind every beard and in every mosque.
During Tashi’s trial in January, prosecutors said that he had deliberately incited separatism by discrediting Beijing’s international image and its treatment of ethnic minorities. This even though he had made it very clear to the Times that he was not advocating Tibetan independence.
His trial, and its forgone conclusion, was proof yet again of the growing xenophobia of Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) government and its unwillingness to tolerate even the minutest criticism.
The CCP has never been a promoter of freedom of expression, but Xi is working harder than his predecessors to force everyone into the Han identity CCP mold.
Taiwan suffered under a similar mentality for decades under the authoritarian Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) government, and only in the past two decades have efforts to preserve and promote languages other than Mandarin, be they Hoklo (also known as Taiwanese), Hakka or the many Aboriginal languages, been given funding and government support.
Xi and his officials like to talk about cross-strait relations in terms of being “one family,” but their vision of family is not an inclusive one.
As Tashi’s case shows, Xi and his cohorts continually ignore what is written in the Chinese and CCP constitutions, and will detain, jail, maim and kill anyone who disagrees with them.
Many Hoklo speakers can remember being punished for speaking that language in school in the 1950s up through the 1980s. Why would any Taiwanese want to see that happen again here?
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath