The Cabinet-level Ocean Affairs Council was launched on Saturday, marking an important first step in Taiwan’s progress toward becoming a maritime nation.
The international aspect of Taiwan’s maritime affairs involves claims to maritime rights, overlapping marine territorial claims with neighboring countries, protection of fishing vessels in international waters, international cooperation in scientific research and participation in world organizations.
The domestic aspect involves marine industries and their development, the use and management of marine resources, law enforcement in maritime territories, marine conservation, sea pollution and marine debris, scientific research, sea-related education and the cultivation of talent.
Land and sea are interrelated. Land-based development has an effect on the health of marine ecosystems, as do pollution and marine debris generated on land, while the conservation of wetlands, for example, has a positive effect.
Under the existing government structure, oceanic affairs involve many ministries, including those of the interior, economic affairs, education and the Environmental Protection Administration. How to take charge and generate its own policy achievements amid these multiple relations will be an essential challenge for the council.
Society’s ongoing political disputes about environmental protection and conservation complicate the challenge. Two major unresolved cases are those of the Shenao Power Plant in New Taipei City and the planned Datan liquefied natural gas terminal in Taoyuan. Both of these cases involve a tug-of-war between coastal development on one side and marine environmental protection on the other. The council will need to persuade groups on both sides about the government’s calls for establishing a nuclear-free homeland while providing stable electric power.
Regarding its policy orientation, the council has many tasks that it needs to complete. The Organization Act of the Ocean Affairs Council has been on the books since 2015, but there is no law about what matters the council is to oversee.
The first thing that the council should do is to assign itself a mission in accordance with the organizational act, and finish drawing up laws regarding its functions, which might be transferred from other ministries.
Given the limited administrative resources available and the practical difficulties that the council is bound to face, these tasks cannot all be achieved at the same time or even in the short term, but its business priorities can still be set.
Apart from firmly tackling the Shenao power station and Datan gas terminal cases, the council should start by dealing with matters that are highly visible and meaningful to the public, thus demonstrating its ability to make substantial policy achievements.
These initial tasks include a nationwide survey of marine debris and measures for managing it, writing a law on the management of marine conservation zones, integrating the development of marine resources, and building systems for cultivating sea-related talent.
Over the long term, the council could gradually probe wider marine prospects, such as the integration and planning of the “blue economy” and related industries, spatial management of the sea, and the establishment of exemplary locations for marine sustainability, such as on outlying islands.
The council’s establishment and operations can take the public’s interactions with the sea to a new and more conspicuous level, and at the same time help Taiwan achieve a firm footing in the “blue economy,” marine sustainability and rich oceanic culture.
Chen Chung-ling is a professor at National Cheng Kung University’s Institute of Ocean Technology and Marine Affairs.
Translated by Julian Clegg
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing