There have been reports in the Hong Kong media quoting the Christian community media in China as saying that Chinese e-commerce platforms have stopped selling the Bible. Almost as soon as the story was published, China’s State Council on Tuesday last week issued a white paper entitled “China’s Policy for Safeguarding Freedom of Religious Beliefs.”
The paper said that “it is a principle established in the Chinese constitution that religious groups and affairs should not be subject to the control of foreign forces.”
It also stated that policies guaranteeing religious freedoms should impose safeguards in accordance with the law and “actively guide religions to conform with socialist society.”
The paper also called on religious communities to support the leadership of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and uphold the socialist system.
In addition, a rumor spread over the Internet that the Chinese government had decided to completely remove all copies of the Bible from e-commerce sites because it wants to promote an alternative “Chinese version” of the Bible, and that the content of this version has been approved by the CCP and modified to incorporate “Chinese traditional culture” and Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) “Thought on Socialism with Chinese Characteristics for a New Era” to produce a “Catholicism with Chinese characteristics.”
This is a crucial time for the establishment of diplomatic relations between the Vatican and China. One of the issues involved in this process is the question of whether or not Beijing will be allowed to interfere with the appointment of bishops in China.
However, the Holy See earlier this year asked Bishop Peter Zhuang Jianjian (莊建堅) of the Shantou Diocese in Guangdong Province to step down in favor of Bishop Joseph Huang Bingzhang (黃炳章), while Bishop Joseph Guo Xijin (郭希錦) of the Mindong Diocese in Fujian Province was asked to step aside for state-appointed Bishop Vincent Zhan Silu (詹思祿) and accept being demoted to auxiliary bishop.
Neither Huang nor Zhan has been ordained by the Holy See.
Following these compromises by the Vatican, the CCP will not only be able to exercise even tighter control over “underground” Catholics, it will also be able to use the global influence of the Catholic Church to its advantage, and expand and raise China’s prestige in the Catholic world.
Earlier this week, there were reports that Guo had “disappeared” the week before, and now there are reports that the Bible has been taken down from e-commerce sites. Perhaps these events mean that the Vatican will stop leaning so strongly toward China.
It is difficult to believe that the Vatican would find it acceptable that Chinese Catholics would have to read a version of the Bible published and annotated by the CCP, and it is even more difficult to believe that the Vatican would allow the Sinicization of the Catholic Church and accept that Catholic bishops serve the CCP.
Chen Kuan-fu is a graduate student in law at National Taipei University.
Translated by Edward Jones and Perry Svensson
China badly misread Japan. It sought to intimidate Tokyo into silence on Taiwan. Instead, it has achieved the opposite by hardening Japanese resolve. By trying to bludgeon a major power like Japan into accepting its “red lines” — above all on Taiwan — China laid bare the raw coercive logic of compellence now driving its foreign policy toward Asian states. From the Taiwan Strait and the East and South China Seas to the Himalayan frontier, Beijing has increasingly relied on economic warfare, diplomatic intimidation and military pressure to bend neighbors to its will. Confident in its growing power, China appeared to believe
Legislators of the opposition parties, consisting of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), on Friday moved to initiate impeachment proceedings against President William Lai (賴清德). They accused Lai of undermining the nation’s constitutional order and democracy. For anyone who has been paying attention to the actions of the KMT and the TPP in the legislature since they gained a combined majority in February last year, pushing through constitutionally dubious legislation, defunding the Control Yuan and ensuring that the Constitutional Court is unable to operate properly, such an accusation borders the absurd. That they are basing this
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) was on Monday last week invited to give a talk to students of Soochow University, but her responses to questions raised by students and lecturers became a controversial incident and sparked public discussion over the following days. The student association of the university’s Department of Political Science, which hosted the event, on Saturday issued a statement urging people to stop “doxxing,” harassing and attacking the students who raised questions at the event, and called for rational discussion of the talk. Criticism should be directed at viewpoints, opinions or policies, not students, they said, adding
Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) spokesman Justin Wu (吳崢) on Monday rebuked seven Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers for stalling a special defense budget and visiting China. The legislators — including Weng Hsiao-ling (翁曉玲), Yeh Yuan-chih (葉元之) and Lin Szu-ming (林思銘) — attended an event in Xiamen, China, over the weekend hosted by the Xiamen Taiwan Businessmen Association, where they met officials from Beijing’s Taiwan Affairs Office (TAO). “Weng’s decision to stall the special defense budget defies majority public opinion,” Wu said, accusing KMT legislators of acting as proxies for Beijing. KMT Legislator Wu Tsung-hsien (吳宗憲), acting head of the party’s Culture and Communications