Late last month, the Taiwanese film Missing Johnny (強尼.凱克) was banned in China after the male lead, Lawrence Ko (柯宇綸), was labeled as being “pro-Taiwan independence.”
Shortly thereafter, GPS maker Garmin Corp, which was cofounded by Taiwan-born American Min Kao (高明環), issued a public apology for listing Taiwan as a country and promised to conduct an overall review of its branch companies’ Web sites.
Just a few days ago, there was another incident, as Asustek Computer Inc (華碩) introduced its home robot “Zenbo” at the inaugural AI Robot Makers Alliance in the Southern Taiwan Science Park. When the robot was asked where it was, it surprisingly answered that it was in Tainan, a city in China’s Taiwan Province.
The fact that a robot, which lacks free will, made such a statement, has helped the Taiwanese public to finally understand that China is using its “sharp power” to try to turn every individual in every domain into a Zenbo.
Beginning late last year, Western countries started asking about the appropriateness and preciseness of the concept of “soft power.” As the economic strength of authoritarian states such as China and Russia grows, they have failed to win the hearts and minds of people around the world through their use of soft power.
Instead, they have tried to control, threaten and tame others.
For example, China uses economic benefits to induce others to submit to and play along with the image that it creates and its propaganda.
Hence, a US National Endowment for Democracy report last year referred to this strength of authoritarian states as “sharp power.”
As The Economist magazine concluded in a recent article, such invasive, penetrative and forceful power could lead to self-censorship or domestic division on China issues in other countries, and even cause them to grant all of Beijing’s requests even before China takes action.
Western democracies are worried about losing their autonomy, but this is already happening in Taiwan as Taiwanese businesses and artists in China turn into Beijing’s Zenbos.
More importantly, China is unilaterally forcing Taiwanese businesses and political groups depending on China to clarify their stances and engage in self-censorship. Using this sharp power, Beijing has also intervened in the interior affairs of other countries, as well as the international domain, demanding that other states alter their stance on the Taiwan issue.
This nonsense is causing various problems, such as the Swedish Tax Agency’s change of the name “Taiwan” on its Web site to “Taiwan, Province of China,” and the Man Booker International Prize’s listing of Taiwanese author Wu Ming-yi (吳明益) as a national of “Taiwan, China,” although it was later restored to “Taiwan.” In other words, China’s sharp power includes its containment of Taiwan.
At a time when Western democracies are criticizing China from a values-based point of view, they have failed to find concrete and effective solutions to curb its sharp power.
Taiwan should at least join them in safeguarding the nation’s defenses based on Taiwanese values. Taiwanese should never ignore or tolerate that Beijing uses its sharp power to hurt their national security and status.
Yen Ming-wei is the spokesman of the Taiwan Radical Wings party and a senior student in National Sun Yat-sen University’s Department of Sociology.
Translated by Eddy Chang
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath