It was breathtaking, even if inevitable: China has abandoned its constraints on one-party rule.
In 1980, Deng Xiaoping (鄧小平), the author of the Chinese miracle, wrote into the nation’s constitution 10-year term limits for Chinese presidents and committed the country to the rule of law. Certainly, China would continue as a one-party state, but it would be one that operated within constitutional bounds. Never again would the country suffer the depredations of a despot like Mao Zedong (毛澤東). Deng even held out the possibility that by 2030, China might become a democracy with a properly independent judiciary.
No more. On Feb. 25, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP)-run People’s Daily announced that Chinese President Xi Jinping (習進平) would be carrying on in office indefinitely. Equally ominously, the constitutional commitment to the rule of law — in any case more observed in the breach — was to be transformed into a commitment to “wielding the law to rule.”
No prizes for guessing who would wield that law. A newly drafted first clause in the constitution, in line with the “thoughts of Xi Jinping,” states that the “leadership of the Chinese Communist Party is the most essential feature of socialism with Chinese characteristics.”
So, alongside his indefinite general secretaryship of the CCP and indefinite term as leader of the Chinese armed forces, Xi is now president of China for life, with no requirement to uphold an impartial system of justice, however qualified in reality. It is a move from autocracy to despotism. Xi is to become the contemporary emperor of China, but unlike previous emperors, he will define and use the law to support his regime rather than attempt to offer an impartial system of justice. You cannot run a continent of 1.3 billion people on the basis of structural injustice.
Thus China’s future is foretold. Yes, the immediate prospect is not great, but dictatorships do not last forever. Like imperial dynasties before it, imperial communism will suffer a succession of revolts from below that will be met by increasing repression until, finally, the system blows up. Censorship, already intense in China, was ratcheted up another notch with last week’s temporary ban on the letter N: Bloggers could no longer refer to Xi serving n terms.
Yet Xi will age, like Zimbabwe’s Robert Mugabe and other “strong men,” and will be terrified of giving up power because of what his enemies will do once he no longer holds the reins. Within China, the moves are portrayed as a sign of strength. The truth is the opposite — and reveals with savage starkness the impossible dilemmas facing the Chinese leadership.
Xi, on taking power five years ago, had no option but to launch a series of highly public anti-corruption drives. The party’s legitimacy was falling to new lows as its leaders shamelessly accumulated vast wealth through back-handers and bribes. However, Xi’s anti-corruption drives could not attack his own power base: They could only be political in character — arriving at the point today where he and his circle cannot countenance an orderly transfer of power in 2022 for fear that they will be rounded on in turn. The party can only go on, hoping that economic growth, growing international power and ruthless nationalism will be sufficient to hold off its growing internal critics.
Yet how is that growth to be achieved? It will not be through benevolent trade deals with a second-order economy, like Britain. The “Made in China 2025” strategy sets out to establish world leadership in key advanced industrial sectors, backed by protection of the country’s own markets. So much for the WTO and its rules.
With their backs against the wall, China’s leaders will double down, so that the nation’s economy will become even more dominated by the party, strengthening its apparatus of control. One little-noticed dimension of the Belt and Road Initiative, investing US$1 trillion overseas, is that China is insisting that all trade disputes be arbitrated by Chinese courts.
British Legislator Jacob Rees-Mogg and British Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs Boris Johnson complain of being vassals to the European court system, constructed on impeccable principles of independent jurisprudence which the UK shares. Try winning a dispute in China’s courts under despot Xi without the power of the EU behind you.
China’s economic rise has captivated the world — it is now the No. 1 global exporter — but it was driven by an astute, if unstable mix of qualified one-party rule, state guidance and fierce competitive capitalism. Deng and the Shanghai “liberals” wanted to engineer a rule-of-law society around market principles in which the CCP had a primary, but not overwhelming rule. After a fashion it worked.
However, now it is time for the West to reappraise its relationship with China. For another aspect of Xi’s thought is that China offers a “new option” as an economic and social model based on Chinese “wisdom.” Thus, China sees itself becoming not only the dominant power in Asia, to which everyone pays tribute, but one that offers wisdom to which everyone must genuflect. Xi is a canny reader of power: Only the EU and the US have the hard and soft power to challenge China’s ambitions and act as an exemplar of why justice matters.
The reason representative democracy trumps referendums as a form of democratic governance is that, as events change, representatives can change course instead of being held to a decision made in very different circumstances. The world in 2018 is different from in 2016 — a fact the front benches of the UK’s main parties have yet to acknowledge. Instead of kowtowing to China in the quest for non-existent trade deals, the UK should be strengthening its commitment to the EU as China throws everything behind despotism. It is an argument the UK deserves to hear — and act on.
Taiwan is rapidly accelerating toward becoming a “super-aged society” — moving at one of the fastest rates globally — with the proportion of elderly people in the population sharply rising. While the demographic shift of “fewer births than deaths” is no longer an anomaly, the nation’s legal framework and social customs appear stuck in the last century. Without adjustments, incidents like last month’s viral kicking incident on the Taipei MRT involving a 73-year-old woman would continue to proliferate, sowing seeds of generational distrust and conflict. The Senior Citizens Welfare Act (老人福利法), originally enacted in 1980 and revised multiple times, positions older
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) has its chairperson election tomorrow. Although the party has long positioned itself as “China friendly,” the election is overshadowed by “an overwhelming wave of Chinese intervention.” The six candidates vying for the chair are former Taipei mayor Hau Lung-bin (郝龍斌), former lawmaker Cheng Li-wen (鄭麗文), Legislator Luo Chih-chiang (羅智強), Sun Yat-sen School president Chang Ya-chung (張亞中), former National Assembly representative Tsai Chih-hong (蔡志弘) and former Changhua County comissioner Zhuo Bo-yuan (卓伯源). While Cheng and Hau are front-runners in different surveys, Hau has complained of an online defamation campaign against him coming from accounts with foreign IP addresses,
Taiwan’s business-friendly environment and science parks designed to foster technology industries are the key elements of the nation’s winning chip formula, inspiring the US and other countries to try to replicate it. Representatives from US business groups — such as the Greater Phoenix Economic Council, and the Arizona-Taiwan Trade and Investment Office — in July visited the Hsinchu Science Park (新竹科學園區), home to Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co’s (TSMC) headquarters and its first fab. They showed great interest in creating similar science parks, with aims to build an extensive semiconductor chain suitable for the US, with chip designing, packaging and manufacturing. The
When Taiwan High Speed Rail Corp (THSRC) announced the implementation of a new “quiet carriage” policy across all train cars on Sept. 22, I — a classroom teacher who frequently takes the high-speed rail — was filled with anticipation. The days of passengers videoconferencing as if there were no one else on the train, playing videos at full volume or speaking loudly without regard for others finally seemed numbered. However, this battle for silence was lost after less than one month. Faced with emotional guilt from infants and anxious parents, THSRC caved and retreated. However, official high-speed rail data have long
RSS