The Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) on Feb. 13 adjusted its forecast for GDP growth this year to 2.42 percent, up 0.13 percent from its earlier projection of 2.29 percent.
“I am optimistic that the economy will continue its current course of stable expansion,” DGBAS Minister Chu Tzer-ming (朱澤民) said.
In the final two quarters of former president Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) final year in office, the fourth quarter of 2015 and the first quarter of 2016, Taiwan’s GDP shrank 0.79 percent and 0.23 percent respectively.
When President Tsai Ing-wen’s (蔡英文) administration took office, it put an end to Ma’s “one China market” policy. Since then, Taiwan’s GDP has stopped shrinking and started growing.
Last year it grew by 2.86 percent, which is a remarkable political achievement for the Tsai administration.
However, the public expects more. Although opinion polls show that the satisfaction rate with the Tsai administration has bounced back to 50.4 percent, it still falls short of the ideal level.
One point that people find puzzling is GDP growth. Considering that the economy grew by 2.86 percent last year and the stock market has been thriving, people wonder why the economy is only expected to grow by 2.41 percent this year.
Does it mean that low growth rates have become the normal state of affairs? If so, why? Are there any solutions to get the nation out of this low-growth rut?
This is a question that the government needs to carefully consider.
One reason for Taiwan’s low growth rates can be seen from the controversy erupted ahead of the Lunar New Year concerning China-based Taiwanese businesspeople and students returning home for the holiday. This shows that China’s policies of using economic means to promote unification, while impoverishing Taiwan, are having an effect.
Nobody knows how many Taiwanese businesspeople and students wanted to return from China to Taiwan for the holiday. On Jan. 4, China unilaterally activated the northbound M503 flight route.
Taiwan’s protests over this move led to two Chinese airlines — China Eastern Airlines and XiamenAir — canceling 176 extra flights that they had planned for the holiday period. These cancelations reportedly affected 50,000 people and made tickets scarce and expensive.
Given that an additional 489 flights were not canceled, and assuming that there are about 150 passengers per flight, the total number of passengers carried on the regular and additional holiday flights would have been about 160,000.
If Taiwanese businesspeople who were flying to Taiwan on domestic airlines were added with those who traveled via the “small three links,” the total exceeds 300,000 people.
Not all Taiwanese businesspeople and students returned from China for the holiday, and some Taiwanese managers stayed in China to work in the period. Adding these figures together, to say that there are 1 million Taiwanese businesspeople living long-term in China would be a conservative estimate.
China has for several years been pursuing a strategy of wooing small and medium-sized Taiwanese enterprises, medium and low-income earners, residents of central and southern Taiwan as well as young people.
Last year, this strategy was updated to focus on the younger generation and to take a grassroots approach. These policies have caused the numbers of Taiwanese businesspeople and students living long-term in China to increase year-on-year. As a result, these people keep shifting their consumption from Taiwan to China, along with between 1 percent and 2 percent of Taiwan’s economic growth.
This is the main reason that since 2008 it has been impossible to make Taiwan’s domestic consumption grow faster.
The knock-on effect of Taiwan’s sluggish consumption is insufficient investment. In view of Taiwan’s depressed consumption and high expectations of the Chinese market, investors have shifted their new investments to China. Nearly 80 percent of companies listed on Taiwan’s stock exchange have established manufacturing centers in China, which show how serious this is, and where listed companies go, smaller firms are sure to follow.
The fuss about China-based businesspeople and students returning to Taiwan during holidays shows that Taiwan’s economy has sunk into a vicious cycle. The first step in this cycle is the attractions that China offers, including its huge market, along with Beijing’s policy of attracting young people and grassroots businesses.
This lures increasing numbers of Taiwanese to China, taking with them consumption, which leads to slack domestic investment, which leads to slow growth, which leads to low wages, which makes China more attractive.
If this cycle is not broken, then no matter how hard the government tries, it will never get Taiwan back to its previous annual growth rates of between 4 and 5 percent.
The US faces similar problems, which is why US President Donald Trump proposed a “border adjustment tax” on manufacturers who move their factories abroad during his presidential campaign.
On Feb. 12, Trump proposed levying a “reciprocal tax” on countries that trade unfairly. By the same logic, taxing Taiwanese businesspeople who operate overseas more heavily, such as by levying countervailing duties, would raise the costs that Taiwanese businesspeople face when moving to China. That could gradually stem the tide of Taiwanese businesspeople people moving offshore and is one solution that merits consideration.
Huang Tien-lin is a national policy adviser and former managing director and chairman of First Commercial Bank.
Translated by Julian Clegg
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath