The relationship between India and Taiwan has improved significantly in recent times, with the two nations expanding cooperation in various fields, including defense, trade and commerce.
While the relationship can be traced to before India’s independence, bilateral ties between the two nations ceased to exist in 1950 when India accorded diplomatic recognition to the People’s Republic of China.
During the Cold War, the prospect of having even informal ties between New Delhi and Taipei remained remote, as Taiwan joined the US-led bloc and India followed a non-alignment policy.
However, in 1995, India and Taiwan chartered an unofficial relationship with the establishment of the India-Taipei Association (ITA) in Taipei.
In 2002, the directors of the ITA and the Taipei Economic and Cultural Center (TECC) signed an agreement on promotion and protection of investments. In 2006, the Taiwan-India Cooperation Council, a private organization, was established in Taipei. The two nations signed a double taxation avoidance agreement and a customs cooperation agreement in 2011.
In 2004, Taiwan began offering Indian students the Taiwan Scholarship and National Huayu Enrichment Scholarship to study Mandarin, and airlines started direct flights between New Delhi and Taipei in 2003.
In 2007, the ITA and the TECC signed a memorandum of understanding on behalf of India’s Department of Science and Technology under the Ministry of Science and Technology and Taiwan’s National Science Council.
When Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s government came to power, it showed its intent to deepen engagement with Taiwan under its Act East Policy. Consequently, Taiwan’s deputy minister of economic affairs was invited to attend the “Vibrant Gujarat” conference in 2015.
The victory of Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) candidate Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) in the presidential election in 2016 increased the prospect of cementing ties between the two nations.
Despite China’s objection, the Indian government’s decision to host a delegation of three female Taiwanese lawmakers in February was further seen as a big move toward improving the bond, especially when India-China ties are going through an extremely bad phase.
Of course, both nations have their reasons to accelerate bilateral ties. One area is their bilateral economic and trade engagement.
Trade between the two nations increased from US$1.2 billion in 2000 to US$6 billion in 2016, with nearly 90 Taiwanese companies working in different sectors of the Indian economy, and the Tsai government’s New Southbound Policy, along with the Modi government’s Act East Policy, could play a vital role in deepening economic ties between the two nations.
In August 2015, Taiwan-based Foxconn, one of the largest hardware manufacturers in the world, announced an investment of US$5 billion in India.
Given its huge foreign reserves and expertise in the fields of hardware manufacturing, construction, infrastructure, mine exploration, electronic manufacturing, logistics, automobiles, food processing and others, Taiwan could play a vital role in the success of the Modi government’s “Make in India,” “Digital India” and “Skill India” initiatives.
A pact signed between the two sides in December last year institutionalizing cooperation in areas, including engineering, product manufacturing, and research and development, should further boost their engagement in this field.
For instance, if India’s expertise in software and Taiwan’s expertise in hardware came together, it would be beneficial to both sides.
At the same time, by providing a big market, India could significantly reduce the deepening economic ties between China and Taiwan, a stated goal of the Tsai administration as part of her New Southbound Policy.
Meanwhile, with the use of Taiwan’s agro-technology, India could transform its agriculture sector as well.
With the aim of promoting industrial technical cooperation and business, the two sides last year signed a memorandum of understanding on the promotion of industry collaboration. New Delhi and Taipei have also signed an air services agreement and a memorandum of understanding on agricultural cooperation to boost their bilateral ties in these areas.
Strategically, both nations face security threats from China.
India has a long-standing dispute with China and in recent times Beijing has increased its assertive posturing on Indian territories. Beijing has also expressed its aim of annexing Taiwan militarily.
New Delhi and Taipei also share the common interest of preventing China from making the South China Sea its exclusive zone.
By working together, Taiwan could further consolidate its identity as an independent state and India could strengthen its position in the region.
Taiwan has a better understanding of the People’s Republic of China and is also ready to host Indian military students at its National Defense University. Developing strategic ties with Taiwan could greatly help India understand China’s strategic thinking, thereby improving its own military prowess.
Since the Modi government has attached huge importance to soft diplomacy as a part of India’s foreign policy to achieve its national interests, promoting tourism with Taiwan could also be an attractive way of cementing ties between the two nations, given that Buddhism is the religion of the majority of Taiwanese and India is its homeland.
The one major obstacle that hampers close ties between India and Taiwan is India’s acceptance of the “one China” policy.
However, this should not deter New Delhi from seeking close security and economic ties with Taiwan in the same way that Beijing is expanding its involvement with Islamabad in Pakistan-occupied Kashmir.
Thus, India should take bold initiatives to reach out to Taiwan.
India should also assert its right to decide the kind of relations it wishes to have with Taiwan if China dictates that India should not deal with Taiwan directly.
As Tsai has announced that relations with India are to be prioritized, it is hoped that India and Taiwan will be able to strengthen their bilateral ties.
Sumit Kumar is a Ministry of Foreign Affairs visiting fellow at National Chengchi University and a research fellow at the Chennai Centre for China Studies.
In the US’ National Security Strategy (NSS) report released last month, US President Donald Trump offered his interpretation of the Monroe Doctrine. The “Trump Corollary,” presented on page 15, is a distinctly aggressive rebranding of the more than 200-year-old foreign policy position. Beyond reasserting the sovereignty of the western hemisphere against foreign intervention, the document centers on energy and strategic assets, and attempts to redraw the map of the geopolitical landscape more broadly. It is clear that Trump no longer sees the western hemisphere as a peaceful backyard, but rather as the frontier of a new Cold War. In particular,
When it became clear that the world was entering a new era with a radical change in the US’ global stance in US President Donald Trump’s second term, many in Taiwan were concerned about what this meant for the nation’s defense against China. Instability and disruption are dangerous. Chaos introduces unknowns. There was a sense that the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) might have a point with its tendency not to trust the US. The world order is certainly changing, but concerns about the implications for Taiwan of this disruption left many blind to how the same forces might also weaken
As the new year dawns, Taiwan faces a range of external uncertainties that could impact the safety and prosperity of its people and reverberate in its politics. Here are a few key questions that could spill over into Taiwan in the year ahead. WILL THE AI BUBBLE POP? The global AI boom supported Taiwan’s significant economic expansion in 2025. Taiwan’s economy grew over 7 percent and set records for exports, imports, and trade surplus. There is a brewing debate among investors about whether the AI boom will carry forward into 2026. Skeptics warn that AI-led global equity markets are overvalued and overleveraged
As the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) races toward its 2027 modernization goals, most analysts fixate on ship counts, missile ranges and artificial intelligence. Those metrics matter — but they obscure a deeper vulnerability. The true future of the PLA, and by extension Taiwan’s security, might hinge less on hardware than on whether the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) can preserve ideological loyalty inside its own armed forces. Iran’s 1979 revolution demonstrated how even a technologically advanced military can collapse when the social environment surrounding it shifts. That lesson has renewed relevance as fresh unrest shakes Iran today — and it should
RSS