Every time there is a major political shift in Hong Kong, the number of Hong Kongers emigrating to Taiwan rises sharply, according to a report by Voice of America.
As of December 2016, more than 70,000 Hong Kong and Macau residents had emigrated to Taiwan. Experts have suggested that the trend of Hong Kongers emigrating to Taiwan will continue, as many have grown disillusioned with the territory.
There have been three major peaks of Hong Kong residents emigrating to Taiwan: In 1983, when then-British prime minister Margaret Thatcher failed to renegotiate the lease for Hong Kong; in 1989 shortly after the Tiananmen Square massacre; and in 1997 after Britain’s sovereignty over Hong Kong was transferred back to the Chinese government.
However, when it comes to the influx into Hong Kong, more people from the Chinese mainland have immigrated there after it was returned to China. The more Chinese move to Hong Kong, the easier it becomes for Beijing to gain complete control of the territory. Nevertheless, the forceful administrative measures imposed by Beijing are gradually and steadily wearing down Hong Kongers’ identification with China.
China deploys various political and economic strategies toward Hong Kong, depriving the “Pearl of the Orient” of its shining luster and aiming ultimately at the complete integration of Hong Kong into China to stop the spread of universal values in the mainland. This way, the “one country, two systems” formula will never have an effect on China’s one-party authoritarian rule.
Hong Kongers did not have a say when China signed the Sino-British Joint Declaration or when its mini-constitution, the Basic Law, was drafted and put into effect in 1997. They are, metaphorically speaking, destined to be a piece of meat on China’s chopping block.
Moreover, the declaration is regarded by Beijing as no more than a “historical document,” and the pledges made in the declaration are not worth the paper they were written on.
The “double general elections” — of the Hong Kong chief executive and the Legislative Council — are now just a historical irony, as directly elected lawmakers were disqualified from entering the legislature by Hong Kong courts on account of small “technical” issues, as they “failed to sincerely take the oath of office.”
Former Chinese leader Deng Xiaoping’s (鄧小平) quip that “horse races will go on and night clubs will stay open” for the next 50 years was also intended to serve China’s “united front” tactics toward Taiwan.
Despite the breakdown of the “one country, two systems” framework in Hong Kong, Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) continues to tell Taiwan that the same system will be used there, regardless of Hong Kongers’ indignation having spread across Taiwan.
While Xi’s call is ineffectual, Taiwanese should read carefully between the lines to understand its hidden implications: Beijing does not care about the will of 23 million Taiwanese, as its wants to impose its will over Taiwan and forcefully incorporate it into China, making it serve China’s big power dreams.
After all, Taiwan is China’s gateway to the Pacific Ocean, and the Taiwan Strait is the corridor that controls international flight and maritime routes.
Behind the struggle of wills between Taipei and Beijing, there is a competition between big powers. Establishing closer ties with other democratic allies to counter authoritarian China would be in Taiwan’s best interest.
However, some Taiwanese enjoy the benefits of Taiwan’s democratic countermeasures against authoritarian China, while at the same time taking advantage of Taiwan’s democracy to serve China’s invasion plans.
From “one China, different interpretations” and “one China, same interpretation” to the promotion of unification instead of opposition to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), these people repeatedly blow the trumpet for China’s prosperity while spreading defeatism in Taiwan, to the extent that they are working for China’s united front tactics and its spy network.
Seeing the rise of the Taiwanese will since 2016, China has begun to accentuate its military threat toward Taiwan by sending military aircraft and naval vessels to circumnavigate Taiwan. Economically, China is changing its policy to “buy off Taiwanese” and “wear down the Taiwanese economy” in an attempt to cultivate pro-unification economic groups in compensation for the decline of pro-unification political groups.
Regardless of Beijing’s economic unification strategy and Taiwan’s abandoning opposition to the CCP for promoting unification, the very real example of Hong Kong cannot be ignored. Hong Kong’s unification with China is complete, it has accomplished the “one China” dream of the pro-unification camp.
The regression of democracy, liberty and human rights in Hong Kong clearly shows Taiwan’s 23 million people what they will get once Taiwan is reduced to another piece of “the Chinese dream.”
The example held up by Beijing for Taiwan is emerging on the cross-strait political stage: Kaohsiung-born academic Lu Li-an (盧麗安), who served as a delegate to the CCP’s 19th National Congress last year, and those of her ilk can be juxtaposed with the likes of Hong Kong Chief Executive Carrie Lam (林鄭月娥), and once the nightmare of authoritarian China interfering with democratic Taiwan becomes a reality, every aspect of Taiwanese life — from everyday life to Taiwan’s strategic role — will irretrievably deteriorate.
Whether Taiwanese are capable of standing up and tackling the challenges of China’s “sharp power” is an issue that they all must face.
Officials from China’s Taiwan Affairs Office recently paid visits to Taiwanese businesses, schools, communities and families in 12 Chinese provinces.
During the visits, the officials said that the Chinese government is gradually making plans to provide Taiwanese with equal educational, business, employment and living conditions as Chinese.
They claim that Beijing will keep pushing many more profitable and powerful policies for Taiwanese in China. These policies are in effect no more than an attempt to sugarcoat China’s military threat. Once Taiwan surrenders to China, Taiwanese will not need any “Taiwan model,” either. The policies intended to favor Taiwanese are no different from Hong Kong’s Basic Law, which only served to mollify Hong Kongers and ensured that the transfer of power was executed smoothly. Now that China has achieved its goal, the Basic Law is no more important than a piece of wastepaper to be thrown away.
Missiles and monetary silver bullets are directed at Taiwan. As Taiwan is shielded internationally, whether a Chinese invasion would succeed depends on the will of Taiwanese.
“‘One country, two systems’ will take proper care of Taiwanese people’s interests,” Xi has said.
The rewards distributed by Beijing to people promoting unification through political or economic means are the 30 pieces of silver paid for the lives of a majority of Taiwanese.
Translated by Chang Ho-ming
Congratulations to China’s working class — they have officially entered the “Livestock Feed 2.0” era. While others are still researching how to achieve healthy and balanced diets, China has already evolved to the point where it does not matter whether you are actually eating food, as long as you can swallow it. There is no need for cooking, chewing or making decisions — just tear open a package, add some hot water and in a short three minutes you have something that can keep you alive for at least another six hours. This is not science fiction — it is reality.
In a world increasingly defined by unpredictability, two actors stand out as islands of stability: Europe and Taiwan. One, a sprawling union of democracies, but under immense pressure, grappling with a geopolitical reality it was not originally designed for. The other, a vibrant, resilient democracy thriving as a technological global leader, but living under a growing existential threat. In response to rising uncertainties, they are both seeking resilience and learning to better position themselves. It is now time they recognize each other not just as partners of convenience, but as strategic and indispensable lifelines. The US, long seen as the anchor
Kinmen County’s political geography is provocative in and of itself. A pair of islets running up abreast the Chinese mainland, just 20 minutes by ferry from the Chinese city of Xiamen, Kinmen remains under the Taiwanese government’s control, after China’s failed invasion attempt in 1949. The provocative nature of Kinmen’s existence, along with the Matsu Islands off the coast of China’s Fuzhou City, has led to no shortage of outrageous takes and analyses in foreign media either fearmongering of a Chinese invasion or using these accidents of history to somehow understand Taiwan. Every few months a foreign reporter goes to
The war between Israel and Iran offers far-reaching strategic lessons, not only for the Middle East, but also for East Asia, particularly Taiwan. As tensions rise across both regions, the behavior of global powers, especially the US under the US President Donald Trump, signals how alliances, deterrence and rapid military mobilization could shape the outcomes of future conflicts. For Taiwan, facing increasing pressure and aggression from China, these lessons are both urgent and actionable. One of the most notable features of the Israel-Iran war was the prompt and decisive intervention of the US. Although the Trump administration is often portrayed as
RSS