Every Lunar New Year, the nation’s highways become jammed with vehicles as the great migration from north to south begins, and becomes congested again in the other direction when the holiday draws to a close.
Even if only one-tenth of the several million southerners who work in northern Taiwan returned home for the holiday, the highways would become choked with traffic.
This is Taiwan’s north-south problem in a nutshell. Northern Taiwan is home to the nation’s political, financial and academic centers, which pull on the south’s population and capital, leaving southern Taiwan marginalized.
In this year’s local elections, Pingtung County and Kaohsiung might each lose a legislative seat as a consequence of the south’s diminishing population, a direct result of marginalization.
It is not as if Pingtung County Commissioner Pan Men-an (潘孟安) or Kaohsiung Mayor Chen Chu (陳菊) have lacked effort, but no matter what they do, they will be no match for the north’s pull.
The kerfuffle over China’s unilateral opening of the northbound M503 flight route has also snowballed into a New Year problem that further amplifies the north-south divide.
The Civil Aeronautics Administration has denied requests from China Eastern Airlines and Xiamen Air for additional flights over the route that would have brought up to 60,000 Taiwanese home from China for the holiday.
If the planned additions from eight other Chinese carriers are factored in, the number rises from 176 flights to 489. If the scheduled and additional flights operated by Taiwanese carriers and the “small three links” are also included, then the number of China-based Taiwanese businesspeople returning home for the holidays probably equals the north-south migration.
The New Year north-south flood of traffic is symbolic of Taiwan’s north-south divide, while the wave of China-based Taiwanese businesspeople returning home is symbolic of Taiwan’s economic marginalization, a result of the pull of China’s economy since 2000.
Pro-China academics like to use pre-existing theories to explain away the nation’s economic woes. The administrations of former presidents Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) and Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) developed a plethora of plans to boost the economy and drum up investment, but failed.
China is the main cause of the nation’s economic problems, and the annual wave of Taiwanese businesspeople returning for the holiday makes it clear why domestic consumer growth keeps falling.
If hundreds of thousands — or even more than 1 million — of Taiwan’s strongest consumer groups are in China, of course domestic demand will wither. The result is falling domestic investment, wage stagnation and a depressed economy.
Frosty Chinese relations, the result of President Tsai Ing-wen’s (蔡英文) administration not recognizing the so-called “one China” principle, has given Taiwan an 18-month window to take stock and rebuild its economic strength.
Last year, economic growth recovered to 2.58 percent from 0.81 percent in 2015. Beijing is well aware that the situation is advantageous to Taiwan and that it cannot allow the present state of affairs to continue.
Chinese Vice Premier Wang Yang (汪洋), who is about to take control of Taiwan issues, has emphasized the importance of “further integration of the economies on either side of the Strait.”
Wang intends to lure Taiwanese businesses and young people, as well as implement a policy to impoverish Taiwan.
The Tsai administration must not underestimate this threat to the nation’s economy. If it does, all of the government’s economic reform programs will be in vain.
Huang Tien-lin is a national policy adviser and former managing director and chairman of First Commercial Bank.
Translated by Edward Jones
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath