The set of amendments to the Income Tax Act (所得稅法) that cleared the legislative floor on Thursday last week represents the most ambitious tax reform plan the nation has had in two decades. However, the US’ overhaul of its taxes is a wake-up call for Taiwan over the need to compete for talent and investments.
The Taiwanese tax reform plan removes the highest marginal income tax rate of 45 percent from the individual income tax rate brackets and halves the tax rate on corporations’ undistributed earnings to 5 percent, but raises the corporate income tax rate from 17 to 20 percent, with the rate for small and medium-sized enterprises to rise in annual increments of 1 percentage point over three years.
To narrow the gap between tax rates for domestic and foreign investors, the amendments include a 1 percentage point increase in foreign investors’ dividend income tax rate and provide two options for domestic investors to calculate their dividend taxes.
The plan also increases various tax deductions for wage-earners, parents of preschoolers and disabled people, which is expected to benefit 5.42 million people with a reduction of NT$10,000 to NT$15,000 (US$340 to US$510) on average in income taxes, according to government estimates.
Overall, the nation’s tax reform focuses more on tax fairness and wealth redistribution, compared with the US tax cut that makes a tremendous effort to increase domestic investment.
However, even though the government is likely to lose about NT$56.2 billion in tax revenue over the first three years, because the latest tax cuts should benefit wage-earners and domestic stock investors, average disposable incomes might increase by NT$38.8 billion a year and that should give a modest boost to domestic demand, Minister of Finance Sheu Yu-jer (許虞哲) said on Friday.
In other words, even though the reforms could inflict short-term pain, they cannot be a bad thing in the long term. Given the constraints the government faces and considering the nation’s needs, the tax reforms overall appear wise.
However, Taiwan should rethink the competitiveness of its corporate tax structure after the US’ tax overhaul reduced its taxes to among the lowest in the developed world.
Following the 3 percentage point increase, Taiwan’s corporate tax rate remains low compared with the US’ 21 percent, the average rate of 24.7 percent in European nations, South Korea’s 22 percent and China’s 25 percent, but it is still higher than Hong Kong’s 16.5 percent and Singapore’s 17 percent.
Moreover, the US tax overhaul offers a one-off tax break on cash held overseas in addition to a dramatic reduction in the corporate tax rate, which could lead large US companies, such as Apple Inc, Microsoft Corp and Pfizer Inc, to return US$1.6 trillion to US$2 trillion in offshore deposits to the US, according to DBS Bank’s estimates.
As openness to trade, capital flows, movement of labor and the exchange of technology have made the world more interconnected than ever, the US’ tax reforms are certain to have an effect on other economies. The Taiwanese government needs to consider more tax incentives to stem the outflow of talent and protect local industries, while looking at structural changes in the tax base.
Meanwhile, whether the US’ tax reforms will attract more investments by Taiwanese companies and whether they will relocate some of their production to the US depends on the firms. An improved manufacturing environment in the US after the tax overhaul could trigger a global supply chain reshuffle to which local businesses need to pay attention.
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry