Even by the standards of a country where something unexpected happens every minute, the scene last week at India’s Supreme Court was startling.
India’s top judges are invariably reticent; for example by shying away from any public display of political affiliations. However, the four most senior judges of the court last week held a news conference together, an unprecedented act.
They then accused their boss, Indian Chief Justice Dipak Misra, of undermining the Supreme Court — the one institution in the nation that many fondly thought was insulated from corruption or political interference.
Democracy might not survive, the judges said.
Let us get one thing straight: These judges are not malcontents or habitual dissenters. Some of them lean conservative, others liberal. One of them is due to take over as chief justice later this year, when Misra retires — unlike in the US, where US Supreme Court judges serve for life, in India they have a clear exit date.
The four justices leveled some disturbing allegations at Misra.
India’s chief justice really has only one unique power: the ability to decide which set of judges hears which case.
Given that India’s Supreme Court has dozens of judges — another difference from the US, which famously has only nine — this power is far from meaningless. You could, theoretically, encourage certain outcomes by handing cases over to certain judges, if you knew in advance their sympathies and predispositions.
That is exactly what the four justices at the news conference said they feared.
“There have been instances where cases having far-reaching consequences for the nation and the institution have been assigned by the chief justices of this court selectively to the benches ‘of their preference’ without any rational basis for such assignment,” they said.
The judges referred obliquely to at least one such case: the examination of whether there was anything suspicious about the 2014 death of Justice BH Loya, who was trying a murder case against Amit Shah, who has since arguably become India’s second-most powerful man.
Shah is president of the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), which runs the federal government and most of the states, and he has long been Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s right-hand man.
The magazine Caravan last month broke a story rasing some unsettling questions about the circumstances surrounding Loya’s death — a death which coincidentally cleared the way for the dismissal of the murder charge against Shah.
When asked about the controversy early last month, Shah, who has denied any wrongdoing, said the law would “take its own course.”
The Supreme Court was forced to take notice of the problem; after all, a judge had died, but the four judges speaking out apparently believed that a more senior bench of their fellows should have been assigned to the question than the one decided on by Misra.
Hours after the latter turned down their request that he reconsider, they called their news conference.
The possibility of a subversion of justice — in a case involving a dead judge and powerful politicians — would be deeply troubling if true. Such things happen in countries without a real judiciary or democratic institutions. It is not how things are meant to be done in India.
On Monday, it looked like the situation had returned to normal; Supreme Court justices do not go on strike — at least, not yet. The BJP brought forward the young son of the dead judge who said, while surrounded by a battery of lawyers, that he no longer supported an investigation into his father’s death.
However, damage has been done to the court and to the government. Questions are now being asked about multiple other such assignments of cases.
Until Misra clears the air and makes institutional changes to how cases are assigned, such suspicions are not going away, and unless there is an open, swift and independent investigation of Loya’s death, suspicions about that will not subside either.
India’s judicial system is hardly the best in the world. It is overworked, choked by hundreds of long-running or unnecessary cases and yes, as any businessman will tell you, the lower judiciary is perhaps open to a spot of bribery or a touch of manipulation.
However, it has long been assumed that at least the higher judiciary is independent and clean. For investors and citizens alike, the presence of a Supreme Court that can be trusted made up for myriad other failings of the Indian state. Restoring that faith should be an urgent priority.
Mihir Sharma is a Bloomberg View columnist. He was a columnist for the Indian Express and the Business Standard. This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.
South China Sea exercises in July by two United States Navy nuclear-powered aircraft carriers reminds that Taiwan’s history since mid-1950, and as a free nation, is intertwined with that of the aircraft carrier. Eventually Taiwan will host aircraft carriers, either those built under its democratic government or those imposed on its territory by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and its People’s Liberation Army Navy (PLAN). By September 1944, a lack of sufficient carrier airpower and land-based airpower persuaded US Army and Navy leaders to forgo an invasion to wrest Taiwan from Japanese control, thereby sparing Taiwanese considerable wartime destruction. But two
This year, India and Taiwan can look back on 25 years of so-called unofficial ties. This provides an occasion to ponder over how they can deepen collaboration and strengthen their relations. This reflection must be free from excitement and agitation caused by the ongoing China-US great power jostling as well as China’s aggressive actions against many of its neighbors, including India. It must be based on long-term trends in bilateral engagement. To begin with, India and Taiwan, thus far, have had relations constituted by various activities, but what needs to be thought about now is whether they can transform their ties
On Thursday last week, US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo delivered a barnstorming speech at the Richard Nixon Presidential Library and Museum in Yorba Linda, California, titled “Communist China and the Free World’s Future.” The speech set out in no uncertain terms the insoluble ideological divide between a totalitarian, communist China and the democratic, free-market values of the US. It was also a full-throated call to arms for all nations of the free world to rally behind the US and defeat China. Pompeo elaborated on a clear distinction between China and the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), in an attempt to recalibrate the
As Taiwan is engulfed in worries about Chinese infiltration, news reports have revealed that power inverters made by China’s Huawei Technologies Co are used in the solar panels on the top of the Legislative Yuan’s Zhenjiang House (鎮江會館) on Zhenjiang Street in Taipei. However, what is even more worrying is that Taiwan’s new national electronic identification card (eID) has been subcontracted to the French security firm and eID maker Idemia, which has not only cooperated with the Chinese Public Security Bureau to manufacture eIDs in China, but also makes the new identification cards being issued in Hong Kong. There might be more