During a visit to the Marshall Islands on Tuesday last week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) announced that Taiwan would soon extend visa-free access to nationals of its six South Pacific diplomatic allies: the Marshall Islands, Kiribati, Nauru, the Solomon Islands, Palau and Tuvalu.
Faced with China’s economic offensive aimed at undermining its diplomatic relations, Taiwan cannot rely on purely conventional means to consolidate its diplomatic friendships and the government’s visa waiver announcements is a departure from the usual one-way economic aid programs.
Nonetheless, this new turn in diplomatic thinking must involve a balanced approach that takes border security into account.
Since the Tsai administration took office in May last year, it has extended visa waivers or otherwise relaxed visa requirements for ASEAN members to promote its New Southbound Policy.
Even though some countries have not immediately reciprocated the offer, the government has still gone ahead with such measures in the hope of progress.
In view of Taiwan’s increasingly difficult diplomatic situation, the government has proceeded with this policy on a region-by-region basis. In July the government announced that Taiwan would grant visa waivers to its 11 diplomatic allies in Latin America and the Caribbean, and now it has done the same for six in the South Pacific.
Some of Taiwan’s diplomatic allies are not well off economically, so not many of their citizens are likely to visit Taiwan.
Nonetheless, the administration’s departure from the usual talks with partners’ governments about providing economic aid and instead directly appealing to citizens demonstrates Taiwan’s unprejudiced attitude and boosts its diplomatic legitimacy.
Looking back over Taiwan’s developmental experience, the reason Taiwanese have gained so much freedom of travel, with visa-free access to more than 100 countries and regions, is that the international community has come to recognize the good character of Taiwanese and the trustworthiness of their passports.
As for foreigners who want to visit Taiwan, the government only allows the citizens of 60 countries and regions to enter without a visa. Whether all the countries to which Taiwan’s government has extended visa waivers over the past year enjoy the same degree of trust around the world is open to debate.
Visas perform a gatekeeping function, especially now that governments are placing more emphasis on counterterrorism measures. With so many countries becoming eligible for visa-free entry to Taiwan, we have to consider whether travelers could arrive using forged or altered passports.
There are some countries where people earn much less than Taiwanese, so visitors from those places might be tempted to overstay, leading to economic and social problems. These questions call for a rigorous evaluation of national security.
It is important to allow people from other countries to come to Taiwan and see its beauty — not only to boost domestic demand through tourism and consumption, but also to raise new possibilities for interaction with other parts of the world.
Nonetheless, border security is an essential consideration, so if the government does not take a balanced approach, it might be hard for its visa-exemption measures to move Taiwan’s international interactions in an entirely positive direction.
Su Yung-yao is a reporter with the Liberty Times.
Translated by Julian Clegg
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath