After Wang Yu-ching (王裕慶), a Taiwanese student at Peking University in Beijing, pledged to join the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) to become “a participant in the motherland’s great rejuvenation,” Chang Li-chi (張立齊), another Taiwanese student studying at the school, said that he had attempted to apply for CCP membership for years.
Chang accused Taiwan of a lack of freedom of speech and monopoly of thought, saying the government is intolerant politically and “excludes” those who hold different views, as democracy has descended into a tool manipulated by the few.
The successive reports about Taiwanese students pledging loyalty to the CCP are intriguing.
Most Taiwanese saw Chang’s accusations as little more than a joke. If Taiwan were an undemocratic country without freedom of speech, he would have faced more serious consequences than being “excluded” for reading publications about communism.
Also, the pro-communist Taiwanese student’s attack on Taiwan’s democracy was directly reported in the local media, in articles that are accessible to all. Is that not precisely a demonstration of this country’s high degree of freedom of speech? Which authoritarian political regime would ever tolerate such public displays of dissidence?
However, I am more curious as to why, after stories about Taiwanese native Lu Li-an (盧麗安) serving as a delegate to the CCP’s 19th National Congress, media have started to publish this succession of stories about Taiwanese students in China pledging loyalty to Beijing by praising the “motherland” and the CCP leadership, while mocking the country in which they grew up.
It is interesting to note that they are both gifted and talented students at the prestigious Peking University, and that both stories initially broke in specific media outlets in Taiwan. Is it a coincidence, or is it all orchestrated?
In the latter case, the CCP’s underhand United Front approach could be evolving to target Taiwanese young people. The reason for the change in approach is quite obvious: Beijing is trying to influence the “natural independence” (天然獨) generation in Taiwan: people born after the lifting of martial law in 1987 that identify predominantly with Taiwan, not China.
In recent years, the job environment in Taiwan has been challenging, to say the least. Many young people, even those with excellent academic degrees, find it difficult to get a decent job, and low pay is another source of frustration. This happens to be a breakthrough point for the CCP’s United Front work, as Beijing is trying to lure the elite of Taiwan’s young generation over to China with the promise of jobs.
While delivering a report at the opening session of the congress on Oct. 18, Chinese President Xi jinping (習近平) said “Taiwanese compatriots” would enjoy “the same treatment as local people when they pursue their studies, start businesses, seek jobs or live on the mainland,” in an attempt to attract Taiwan’s “natural independence” generation.
We should never think that this is not attractive to young people, as ever more high-school graduates choose to enroll at Chinese universities, instead of taking the college entrance exams in Taiwan. They generally believe that the sooner they start to make contact with China, the better their chances of staying there for their own development.
We should never take it as a joke when Taiwanese students studying at Peking University pledge loyalty to the CCP while making an appeal to Taiwan, because there is a serious political challenge lurking beneath this — and one that is a severe test for Taiwan’s own future.
And yes, this threatens the freedom and democracy that we are so proud of.
Hsu Yu-fang is a professor of Chinese literature at National Dong Hwa University.
Translated by Eddy Chang
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath