At the Democratic Progressive Party’s (DPP) national congress on Sept. 24, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文), who also serves as the party’s chairperson, called for constitutional reforms. Anyone who understands the situation knows this to be a bogus issue.
Only two years ago, the two main parties in the legislature used that issue to fool Taiwanese. Many now say that talk of constitutional reform is a diversion. Despite that, some have followed up by proposing constitutional reform bills that would introduce a full presidential system or a parliamentary system.
However, if the right of Taiwanese to a constitutional amendment initiative were to be added to the Referendum Act (公民投票法) amendment that is being discussed in the legislative caucuses, this constitutional dilemma could be resolved.
In the last constitutional amendment, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) set a very stringent threshold for constitutional amendments to protect the “one China” constitutional framework.
With a total of 113 legislative seats, a constitutional amendment can be initiated by 29 legislators — one-quarter of the total — and then passed by at least 85 legislators provided a quorum of three-quarters is present.
As the KMT holds 35 seats, passing a resolution is nearly impossible for the legislature.
Even if a miracle were to happen and the legislature passed the amendment, it would have to be approved in a referendum by all eligible voters in the “free area of the Republic of China” — a total of 18.78 million in the most recent presidential election — and the number of valid votes in favor of the amendment would need to exceed one-half of the total number of voters — about 9.4 million — for the constitutional amendment to pass.
Unless the sun rises in the west, a constructional amendment will never pass, which is why a constitutional amendment is a bogus issue.
Moreover, during former president Chen Shui-bian’s (陳水扁) term and now Tsai’s, the KMT has advocated that the Constitution should stipulate a parliamentary system, making the president a figurehead who would need to respect the premier.
On the other hand, the DPP has advocated a presidential system, saying that the president is elected by a majority of the people and should therefore be given more power.
However, when Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) was president, the DPP advocated a parliamentary system on the same grounds that the KMT is using now.
Clearly, both the KMT and the DPP make up their minds according to where they sit — their proposals are for the benefit of their own party, rather than for the long-term stability of Taiwan.
Article 17 of the Constitution gives Taiwanese the right to election, recall, initiative and referendum. However, in the Additional Articles of the Constitution, Taiwanese only have the right to election, recall and referendum — initiative, a direct civil right, is not given systemic protection.
The shackles that the existing Referendum Act imposes on the referendum violate the act’s legislative purpose of “ensuring the exercise of direct civil rights,” which is why it is called a “birdcage referendum law” and why it needs to be amended.
In the previous Legislative Yuan, then-DPP legislator Pan Men-an (潘孟安) and other DPP legislators proposed a Referendum Act amendment that added the right to initiate constitutional amendments.
The legislature is about to complete the Referendum Act amendment, which would give citizens the right to amend the Constitution or to write a new constitution.
All Taiwanese would share the consequences of a constitutional referendum, enabling the political parties to avoid the problem of causing cross-strait tension.
Lau Yi-te is chairman of the Taiwan Solidarity Union.
Translated by Lin Lee-kai
Late last month, Beijing introduced changes to school curricula in the Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, requiring certain subjects to be taught in Mandarin rather than Mongolian. What is Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) seeking to gain from sending this message of pernicious intent? It is possible that he is attempting cultural genocide in Inner Mongolia, but does Xi also have the same plan for the democratic, independent nation of Mongolia? The controversy emerged with the announcement by the Inner Mongolia Education Bureau on Aug. 26 that first-grade elementary-school and junior-high students would in certain subjects start learning with Chinese-language textbooks, as
There are worrying signs that China is on the brink of a major food shortage, which might trigger a strategic contest over food security and push Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), already under intense pressure, toward drastic measures, potentially spelling trouble for Taiwan and the rest of the world. China has encountered a perfect storm of disasters this year. On top of disruption due to the COVID-19 pandemic, torrential rains have caused catastrophic flooding in the Yangtze River basin, China’s largest agricultural region. Floodwaters are estimated to have already destroyed the crops on 6 million hectares of farmland. The situation has been
The restructuring of supply chains, particularly in the semiconductor industry, was an essential part of discussions last week between Taiwan and a US delegation led by US Undersecretary of State for Economic Growth, Energy and the Environment Keith Krach. It took precedent over the highly anticipated subject of bilateral trade partnerships, and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) founder Morris Chang’s (張忠謀) appearance on Friday at a dinner hosted by President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) for Krach was a subtle indicator of this. Chang was in photographs posted by Tsai on Facebook after the dinner, but no details about their discussions were disclosed. With
On Sept. 8, at the high-profile Ketagalan security forum, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) urged countries to deal with the China challenge. She said: “It is time for like-minded countries, and democratic friends in the Indo-Pacific region and beyond, to discuss a framework to generate sustained and concerted efforts to maintain a strategic order that deters unilateral aggressive actions.” The “Taiwan model” to deal with the COVID-19 pandemic provides an alternative to China’s authoritarian way of handling it. Taiwan’s response to the health crisis has made it evident that countries across the world have much to learn from Taiwan’s best practices and if