Spanish Prime Minister Mariano Rajoy on Sunday night stuck stubbornly to his script while the rest of the world watched an entirely different movie unfold in Catalonia.
“There was no referendum. What we have seen was a mere dramatization,” Rajoy said.
He sounded a little like a Kremlin spokesperson brushing aside a separatist uprising in, say, Chechnya. Nothing to see here, folks.
Only there was plenty to see and cameras everywhere to document riot police firing rubber bullets into crowds of peaceful protesters, dragging voters by the hair and using truncheons.
The injury estimates were continually revised higher; more than 800 were reportedly injured in clashes with Spanish police. Spanish authorities downplayed those reports.
Regardless, the videos that went viral were damning. It is hard to imagine anything in recent years that could do more to bolster the cause of Catalan separatism.
Spain has now been plunged into its deepest crisis in decades; the 1978 constitutional settlement that granted Spanish regions various degrees of autonomy looks to be in tatters.
In the early hours, Catalonia’s government announced that it had counted nearly 2.3 million ballots that had not been seized and 90 percent were for independence.
It hardly matters that turnout was a low 42 percent; Catalonia’s leaders got exactly what they wanted — victory in the court of public opinion and widespread international condemnation of Madrid.
As clashes with police were broadcast, Catalan President Carles Puigdemont, a former journalist and mayor of Girona, nimbly recast the narrative as “truncheons versus the ballot box.”
For Catalan separatists, Rajoy’s law-and-order mantra conjured images of General Francisco Franco, whose legacy still casts a long shadow over Spain.
Puigdemont is completing his transformation from accidental revolutionary to human rights champion. He must keep promising steps toward independence to keep his movement going.
The problem is that Rajoy and Puigdemont each have firmly committed to a path of escalation.
A declaration of independence would be the next stage in a rapidly intensifying standoff.
Puigdemont says Catalans have earned that right, though it remains to be seen whether parliament would back such a move.
Catalans gathering in Barcelona’s central square on Sunday evening jangled keys, a reference to the local schools that, in defiance of Madrid, turned over their keys to separatists so that ballots could be cast there. The mood in the square was described as funereal rather than celebratory.
Catalans might not have the will to take up arms against the Spanish government, but that is not the same as loyalty; the emotional link to the rest of the country will have been severed for many by Sunday’s violence.
That Rajoy managed to accomplish this was some feat.
Approval for the referendum barely cleared Catalonia’s own parliament last month; it had nowhere near majority support in polls.
Support for independence peaked in 2013 after the Spanish government refused Catalonia’s demands for more autonomy over its finances.
A non-binding vote in 2014, also held in defiance of the Spanish courts, saw 80 percent back a split from Spain on turnout of under 40 percent.
In a recent poll, only 35 percent of respondents said the region should become independent.
That is not surprising: Catalans enjoy a relatively good life; whatever their grievances with the Spanish government, many were wary of the economic uncertainty that life outside Spain — and initially at least outside the EU — could bring.
Rajoy was in a difficult position as Spanish leader, but he had cards to play. He had the support he wanted from his EU counterparts. He had support from his nation’s highest court, which declared the vote illegal. He had Catalan opinion, Spanish national opinion and fair economic winds all on his side.
And while separatist leaders like to paint their movement as a historically fated and united front, the truth is messier; a motley mix of anarchists, anti-capitalists and center-right parties with different agendas and conflicting worldviews had used the cause to build their power base and rally support.
From that high ground, Rajoy might have sought to appease centrist Catalans with concessions, such as infrastructure spending and eventual discussions on enhanced autonomy.
There were some token promises, but as the independence vote loomed, he instead chose to escalate tensions, arresting officials and seizing control of Catalonia’s finances and security apparatus.
Rajoy unleashed a barrage of investigations and prosecutions meant to frustrate the vote.
Catalonia’s high court — which operates separately from the Generalitat, Catalonia’s government — launched investigations of the Catalan Cabinet on charges of disobedience and misuse of public funds, which is punishable with a prison sentence.
There are investigations of regional lawmakers and others connected to the vote.
Spain’s own high court submitted a complaint on charges of sedition against some of the protest organizers on grounds that they disrupted the work of federal authorities by calling on protesters to surround buildings where raids were being conducted. About 700 Catalan mayors have also been placed under preliminary investigation.
Writing in Britain’s Guardian newspaper, Barcelona Mayor Ada Colau — who supported the referendum, but not independence — lambasted Rajoy’s government for seeking a judicial solution to what is essentially a political problem.
“There are many non-separatists, such as ourselves, who, while critical of the unilateral path taken by the Catalan regional government, are calling for a negotiated solution in accordance with the feelings of 82 percent of the Catalan population, who support the holding of an agreed referendum, like the one conducted in Scotland. That is why it is a mistake to think the Catalan question can be resolved by taking legal action against its political representatives: Following that path will only help to raise social tensions and block any possibility of finding a way out of the conflict,” Colau wrote.
Rajoy gave Catalan separatists exactly the coup de theatre they needed for a campaign that only a short time ago looked quixotic.
Whatever happens next, pro-independence forces in Catalonia have received a powerful boost, while Rajoy’s government has lost legitimacy in the eyes of many.
It has also angered the Basque Nationalist Party, on which Rajoy’s weak minority government relies for votes — it had to withdraw next year’s budget last week for lack of support.
“Stop this escalation of radicalism and disobedience once and for all,” Rajoy ordered protesters recently, sounding like an exasperated parent addressing offspring who have grown up, left home and no longer need to obey.
He might be right on the principles; as the head of the democratically elected Spanish government, he has the law on his side, but he will get nowhere with those tactics.
Therese Raphael writes editorials on European politics and economics for Bloomberg View. She was an editorial page editor of the Wall Street Journal Europe. This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing