There was a raft of catchy announcements about electric vehicles in the past week, from scooters in Taiwan to buses in Indiana. Electrification is about more than just automobiles. Every new deployment of batteries and motors is a new opportunity to explore transportation in a different way — seeing them not just as vehicles, but as jobs to be done.
The reason we hear mostly about electric cars is that a lot of cars in general are sold every year.
Just last year, 84 million vehicles were sold worldwide. That was nearly double the number sold in 2000 and half of all sales were in Asia, up from 18 percent in 2000.
Although electric vehicles are just a portion of the electric products market, it is a set of the global market that is growing quickly.
As my colleague Colin McKerracher said on Twitter, the first million electric vehicle sales took two decades. Getting to the next million mark was a blink of an eye in comparison.
Focusing only on cars, though, misses the full range of transportation modes that are being electrified.
Earlier this week, electric bus maker Proterra broke its own record for driving range, with one of its buses clocking more than 1,770km in one charge. That is nearly four times the range of its own vehicles in 2015, but at less than three times the increase in battery size — and it is a giant battery; at a capacity of 660 kilowatt-hours, it is almost seven times larger than the biggest Tesla vehicle battery.
An even bigger battery was tested this week, though, and in an even bigger vehicle. Two Swiss companies retrofitted a 99-tonne Komatsu mining dump truck with a 700 kilowatt-hour battery and an 800 horsepower electric motor. The battery alone weighs 4 tonnes.
The conversion cost more than US$1 million, but it offers two advantages to both owner and operator. The first is that it replaces emissions from diesel combustion with (potentially) lower emissions from electricity generated at a power plant. The second is that full electrification of the drivetrain also allows the vehicle to recharge the battery using regenerative braking. As the truck descends into the mine, it generates 40 kilowatt-hours of energy — and it makes that descent 20 times a day.
At the vastly smaller end of electrified transportation, electric scooter manufacturer Gogoro raised US$300 million in new funding led by Singapore’s sovereign investment fund Temasek Holdings and including investments from former US vice president Al Gore’s Generation Investment Management, Japanese trading house Sumitomo and French utility Engie.
Gogoro, which has already sold 30,000 scooters in Taiwan, is eyeing Southeast Asia for further growth.
This range of electrification paths suggests a different framework for thinking about the future of transportation.
Clayton Christensen, the father of disruption theory, has just that framework: jobs to be done.
It states that companies become “too focused on what companies want to sell, rather than on what customers actually need.”
What customers need is not a product; what they need is to do a job and they hire a product or service to do it.
Using that framework, vehicle electrification looks less like a set of unique applications (or gimmicks) and more like a useful way to get jobs done:
An electric bus with a 1,770km range is doing the job of providing mass transit without emissions at street level, with less noise than a combustion engine and without the need for constant charging.
A mining dump truck with a 700 kilowatt-hour battery is doing the job of moving rocks with reduced fuel consumption and carbon dioxide emissions, while also capturing significant amounts of energy via its own normal operations.
An electric scooter is doing the job of moving people without street-level emissions, while allowing users to book and unlock transportation with their smartphones.
And if those are the sorts of jobs that vehicle electrification can do, then there is one more electric vehicle worth considering: the electric bicycle.
Christensen’s colleague Horace Dediu was kind enough to share his data on electric bicycle sales with me and it is data that should make any automaker pay attention. In Europe, more people now buy electric bicycles than buy mopeds. And this year, consumers worldwide will buy more than 4 million e-bikes.
If the job is to “move people quickly,” then an e-bike is quite capable — so is an electric skateboard. If the job is also “do so quietly, flexibly, and in a way that offers a bit of exercise, too,” then an electric bicycle might be more capable than an automobile in many cases and many places.
“Bikes are eating cars,” Dediu says, in cities that have embraced them as a way to do the job.
Cars — and buses and dump trucks and scooters and bicycles — are products that result from a mix of technical and marketing decisions. View them as jobs to be done and they might look very different.
The job is not “be a car” or “be a dump truck”; it is “move people and things according to abilities, constraints, needs and desires.”
Electrify vehicles, and some of those jobs could be done better. Doing them better could mean many more electric vehicles, of all sorts, on tomorrow’s roads.
Nathaniel Bullard is an energy analyst, covering technology and business model innovation and system-wide resource transitions.
This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath