A campaign to remove statues of Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) has been going on for many years. Although it has to some extent succeeded, there is still a long way to go, given that Chiang Kai-shek Memorial Hall continues to tower over Taipei.
Interestingly, a movement to remove statues and achieve transitional justice is also taking place in the US, that great democratic nation. This movement comes more than 100 years after the related historical events, and its main target is statues commemorating General Robert E. Lee.
Rising tensions between black and white people in recent years have led people to reconsider the myth of Lee.
As far as his military achievements are concerned, Lee was not the greatest of Confederate generals nor was his character or beliefs particularly remarkable. After surrendering to the Union, apart from accepting the abolition of slavery, in which he had no choice, Lee’s opinion of black people did not change much.
When he was invited to testify before a congressional committee, he strongly advocated keeping the South’s economic conditions as they had been, and he opposed giving black people the right to vote.
Despite this, the political considerations of northern and southern politicians led to him being highly praised and elevated to an important symbol of reconciliation between the north and south.
However, that meant reconciliation between southern whites and northern whites, not between black and white, still less between former slaves and former slave owners.
Lee’s heroic image is now crumbling, and the memorials that were erected to him have become politically incorrect edifices that many people see as eyesores.
In May, New Orleans removed a statue of Lee that had quite a long history. At the beginning of this year, the Charlottesville City Council in Virginia decided to remove its memorial to Lee, and in June it resolved to change the name of the park where the statue was located from Lee Park to Emancipation Park.
Unsurprisingly, these moves were met with protests from far-right groups, who converged for demonstrations, which turned into a bloody terrorist attack in which three people were killed and many others were injured.
This issue has become the focus of attention nationwide and a hot topic for commentators, especially after remarks by US President Donald Trump that poured oil onto the flames.
Following the incident, Charlottesville authorities covered the Lee memorial with a black tarpaulin in mourning for the dead. The city council has been very cautious, doing its best not to cause even bigger clashes.
However, some people still asked why it did not cover the statue until more than a week after the incident. The city council said that it could not find a big-enough tarpaulin right away.
The council’s concerns were quite reasonable, but after the statue was covered, white supremacist groups descended on the area again. Gunshots were heard, and it looked as though the tense situation could spin out of control.
Following the clash at Charlottesville, the trend of removing memorials to Lee and other Confederate generals has become unstoppable. Statues of Lee have been removed from the University of Texas, Duke University in North Carolina, Wyman Park in Baltimore and in other places, with more likely to be removed as time goes by.
Who would have thought that in the US, which has never had a dictatorship, statues of Lee would be pulled down amid curses from the public, just as has happened to those of Joseph Stalin, General Francisco Franco and General Augusto Pinochet.
Even though Lee was not a real hero, neither was he an extremely wicked person. He was just a defeated general who was used for political propaganda to promote reconciliation between two groups of white people.
Stranger yet is what is happening in Taipei. The Generalissimo no doubt ranks high among the wicked, but visitors from China are keen to pay their respects at Chiang Kai-shek Memorial Hall.
Perhaps that is a kind of reconciliation, but it is reconciliation between one group of Chinese and another. It is a reconciliation that tramples on Taiwanese.
When people carrying China’s five-star red flag shout and curse at Taiwanese, it is just like far-right neo-Nazis in the US shouting and cursing while waving the Confederate flag.
Such rude provocations amount to telling Taiwanese to keep quiet about their history.
The continued presence of Chiang statues is a symptom of this oppression. Maybe we could learn something from Charlottesville by covering the offending statues with big, black tarpaulins before deciding their final fate.
Li Chung-chih is a professor at Illinois State University and president of the North America Taiwanese Professors’ Association.
Translated by Julian Clegg
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing