While the nation reveled in Taiwanese athletes’ outstanding performance at the Taipei Summer Universiade, the legislature on Thursday passed amendments to the National Sports Act (國民體育法).
While the long-overdue legislation has been touted as a big step toward improving the nation’s sporting environment for the development of athletes and enforcing accountability and financial transparency of sports governing bodies, the Democratic Progressive Party’s (DPP) performance has left many people shaking their heads.
During a legislative review of the draft amendments, the proposal to change the name of the “Chinese Taipei Olympic Committee” to the “National Olympic Committee” was dropped, with the DPP saying that priority should be given to athletes’ rights, rather than making a fuss over a name.
Pathetic.
It is regrettable enough that Taiwanese athletes have to compete in the international sports arena under the ridiculous name “Chinese Taipei,” but it is far more frustrating, and disappointing, that lawmakers did not even try to have the nation’s Olympic committee properly addressed at home. Is this not part of the rights of athletes who compete to bring honor to their nation?
People who argue that politics and sports must not mix should bear in mind that Taiwan has been subjected to using the meaningless name “Chinese Taipei” in line with the Olympic model, which is itself a result of China’s political manipulation.
The Olympic model refers to an agreement reached in 1981 between Taiwan and the International Olympic Committee that only the name “Chinese Taipei” — not “Taiwan” or the “Republic of China” (ROC) — and only the Chinese Taipei Olympic Committee flag — not the ROC flag — can be used at Olympic events.
Just because Taiwan’s official delegation has to march under the absurd “Chinese Taipei” banner, it does not mean the nation’s own Olympic committee has to also be called “Chinese Taipei.”
The DPP’s passive mentality is exactly what Beijing is counting on to continue belittling the nation internationally.
As the DPP shuns calling the nation’s Olympic committee by its rightful name, it is worth noting that a group in Japan has launched a petition calling for Taiwan’s national team to take part in the 2020 Tokyo Summer Olympic Games as “Taiwan,” not “Chinese Taipei.”
The group’s effort ought to put President Tsai Ing-wen’s (蔡英文) administration to shame.
Self-respect gains respect.
Now that the DPP has forsaken a chance to rectify the committee’s name when it had the power to do so, what grounds does the DPP government, or the nation as a whole, have to protest against other nations calling Taiwan “Chinese Taipei” or to demand due respect for Taiwan as a nation?
It is truly pathetic that the DPP government is doing nothing and letting the image of the nation’s Olympic committee be undermined through inadequate reference.
It seems the DPP government is content with issuing quiet rhetoric and expressing regret whenever Taiwan is subjected to absurd treatments at international events.
The Tsai administration’s passivity is disappointing and raises the question: How does it plan to assert Taiwan’s international presence and uphold the nation’s sovereign status on the international stage?
Congratulations to China’s working class — they have officially entered the “Livestock Feed 2.0” era. While others are still researching how to achieve healthy and balanced diets, China has already evolved to the point where it does not matter whether you are actually eating food, as long as you can swallow it. There is no need for cooking, chewing or making decisions — just tear open a package, add some hot water and in a short three minutes you have something that can keep you alive for at least another six hours. This is not science fiction — it is reality.
In a world increasingly defined by unpredictability, two actors stand out as islands of stability: Europe and Taiwan. One, a sprawling union of democracies, but under immense pressure, grappling with a geopolitical reality it was not originally designed for. The other, a vibrant, resilient democracy thriving as a technological global leader, but living under a growing existential threat. In response to rising uncertainties, they are both seeking resilience and learning to better position themselves. It is now time they recognize each other not just as partners of convenience, but as strategic and indispensable lifelines. The US, long seen as the anchor
Kinmen County’s political geography is provocative in and of itself. A pair of islets running up abreast the Chinese mainland, just 20 minutes by ferry from the Chinese city of Xiamen, Kinmen remains under the Taiwanese government’s control, after China’s failed invasion attempt in 1949. The provocative nature of Kinmen’s existence, along with the Matsu Islands off the coast of China’s Fuzhou City, has led to no shortage of outrageous takes and analyses in foreign media either fearmongering of a Chinese invasion or using these accidents of history to somehow understand Taiwan. Every few months a foreign reporter goes to
The war between Israel and Iran offers far-reaching strategic lessons, not only for the Middle East, but also for East Asia, particularly Taiwan. As tensions rise across both regions, the behavior of global powers, especially the US under the US President Donald Trump, signals how alliances, deterrence and rapid military mobilization could shape the outcomes of future conflicts. For Taiwan, facing increasing pressure and aggression from China, these lessons are both urgent and actionable. One of the most notable features of the Israel-Iran war was the prompt and decisive intervention of the US. Although the Trump administration is often portrayed as
RSS