Beijing’s insistence that Taiwan — or the Republic of China (ROC), to use its official title — only participates in international sporting events such as the Olympics or the Summer Universiade using the name “Chinese Taipei” is a masterstroke.
It is also a move that, for Taiwanese, is not only unwelcome, but pernicious.
It is effective for three reasons:
First, it coheres with Beijing’s “one China” principle, for to allow the nation to compete at an international competition using the name Taiwan or ROC would be incompatible with that principle.
Second, there is the message it sends to the international community.
However, one could argue that its nonsensical premise elevates it to a position that it can be more easily scrutinized.
Third, and most persuasively, there is what it means to Taiwanese and how they self-identify.
While the notion that the name issue might prompt scrutiny still applies, names do matter. If you take away a nation’s name, you rob it of its connection with its past.
On Tuesday it was announced that a group in Japan calling itself the Taiwan 2020 Campaign Council has collected almost 100,000 signatures on a petition calling for Taiwan’s national team to take part at the 2020 Tokyo Summer Olympic Games as “Taiwan.” The group plans to present the petition to the Japanese Diet.
The council’s effort is supported by pro-localization and “rectification of names” groups in Taiwan.
The rather cumbersome term “rectification of names” is used to speak of ensuring the name of a place or a thing is correct. This is actually a translation — ironically perhaps — of an ancient Chinese concept.
The Analects quotes Confucius (孔子) as saying: “If names be not correct, language is not in accordance with the truth of things. If language be not in accordance with the truth of things, affairs cannot be carried on to success.”
For Confucius, the “superior man” refers to a place or a thing in terms that best reflect their reality.
This is why, for example, the administration of former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) preferred school history textbooks to refer to Sun Yat-sen (孫逸仙) without prefixing his name with honorifics.
In the Taipei Times, Sun is referred to as the ROC’s founding father, which is historically correct, for this nation is Taiwan.
The ROC is Taiwan’s official title, given to it by the foreign Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) that was exiled here in 1949.
Names are a link to the past. There are parts of northern England, for example, where certain place names remind the local populace even now of their Viking roots from more than 1,000 years ago when the area was under what was called the Danelaw.
This gives locals an idea of the cultural history that formed the environment into which they were born. It does not mean they might claim to be Vikings today.
Like the UK, Taiwanese society is the result of a complex history of immigration and colonialization. That does not mean Taiwanese need to identify themselves as anything other than Taiwanese, despite the overwhelming number who are of Han Chinese descent.
When Japan colonized Taiwan, it embarked upon a process of assimilation of the local populace.
However, many of the place names were simple Japanese transliterations of their Aboriginal titles. Before the Japanese arrived, the area near Kaohsiung was called Takau, meaning “bamboo forest.” The Japanese used the Japanese characters for Kaohsiung (高雄), pronounced “Takao.” They did not change the name itself.
When the KMT took over, the Chinese pronunciation of those characters was used, giving the main city in that area the name as it is pronounced today.
The link to the past is intact.
It is important for the government to be explicit about the reality to which it subscribes. In other words, to officially refer to the nation as Taiwan and to do so unabashedly, despite the delusional reality espoused or conceded by other states.
The conflict in the Middle East has been disrupting financial markets, raising concerns about rising inflationary pressures and global economic growth. One market that some investors are particularly worried about has not been heavily covered in the news: the private credit market. Even before the joint US-Israeli attacks on Iran on Feb. 28, global capital markets had faced growing structural pressure — the deteriorating funding conditions in the private credit market. The private credit market is where companies borrow funds directly from nonbank financial institutions such as asset management companies, insurance companies and private lending platforms. Its popularity has risen since
The Donald Trump administration’s approach to China broadly, and to cross-Strait relations in particular, remains a conundrum. The 2025 US National Security Strategy prioritized the defense of Taiwan in a way that surprised some observers of the Trump administration: “Deterring a conflict over Taiwan, ideally by preserving military overmatch, is a priority.” Two months later, Taiwan went entirely unmentioned in the US National Defense Strategy, as did military overmatch vis-a-vis China, giving renewed cause for concern. How to interpret these varying statements remains an open question. In both documents, the Indo-Pacific is listed as a second priority behind homeland defense and
Every analyst watching Iran’s succession crisis is asking who would replace supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. Yet, the real question is whether China has learned enough from the Persian Gulf to survive a war over Taiwan. Beijing purchases roughly 90 percent of Iran’s exported crude — some 1.61 million barrels per day last year — and holds a US$400 billion, 25-year cooperation agreement binding it to Tehran’s stability. However, this is not simply the story of a patron protecting an investment. China has spent years engineering a sanctions-evasion architecture that was never really about Iran — it was about Taiwan. The
After “Operation Absolute Resolve” to capture former Venezuelan president Nicolas Maduro, the US joined Israel on Saturday last week in launching “Operation Epic Fury” to remove Iranian supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and his theocratic regime leadership team. The two blitzes are widely believed to be a prelude to US President Donald Trump changing the geopolitical landscape in the Indo-Pacific region, targeting China’s rise. In the National Security Strategic report released in December last year, the Trump administration made it clear that the US would focus on “restoring American pre-eminence in the Western hemisphere,” and “competing with China economically and militarily
RSS