As Germany struggles to absorb more than 1 million migrants from the Middle East and Africa, the government is hoping to avoid the mistakes it made half a century ago when it brought in a generation of guest workers from Turkey.
In the 1960s, hundreds of thousands of Turkish men were invited in to fill labor shortages, but Germany made no attempt to help them learn the language or upgrade their skills.
The result is that 3 million Turks in Germany are still struggling today. They are the least integrated minority, with an unemployment rate of about 16 percent, almost three times the national average.
Illustration: Mountain people
Now, two years after it threw open its doors to the latest migrants, Germany has devised an integration strategy based on language and job training intended to get the newcomers into work and off welfare. Among the changes are 600 hours of mandatory language lessons and fast-tracked work permits.
These measures are starting to show signs of success: A growing number of migrants are joining a labor market where a record 1.1 million jobs are unfilled.
“Things are very different here,” said Merhawi Tesfay, a 32-year-old Eritrean who was hired by Kremer Machine Systems, an engineering company in the town of Gescher in western Germany. “In Eritrea you find work through word of mouth. Here you have the Job Center and online job sites. Everything comes with too much bureaucracy and my German was not good enough.”
Tesfay was hired initially as a trainee and then full-time, through ELNet, a government-funded project run by charities who assign mentors to refugees. He had been looking for work for almost three years.
Waves of migrants, many forced to flee Syria’s civil war, began arriving in large numbers two years ago, one of the biggest migration movements Europe had seen since World War II.
The challenge now for Germany, which took in the largest number of the incomers in western Europe, is to integrate them into society over the long term.
With its strong economy, Germany is better placed than many European countries, especially in southern Europe, to accept migrants. German unemployment is at its lowest since 1990 and seven straight years of growth mean the government can afford to put aside more than 10 billion euros (US$11.8 billion) a year for refugees.
“The lesson that Germany learnt is that integration is something you work on,” said Herbert Bruecker, a visiting professor at Humboldt University of Berlin. “It doesn’t happen on its own.”
GIVE AND TAKE
When the first Turkish guest workers arrived in the 1960s, German politicians, still preoccupied with rebuilding the economy after World War II, regarded them as a temporary measure. The perception was that Turks were guests who would go back home.
The Turks of course did not go home, and their wives and children began following them, just as the oil crisis of the early 1970s pushed Germany into a recession that cost many guest workers their jobs.
With low skills and little grasp of the language, many found it hard to find work again as Germany shifted away from industry towards automation and services.
This time, Germany has taken a different approach.
One month after her decision to open Germany’s borders to refugees fleeing war and persecution, German Chancellor Angela Merkel in September 2015 told the German parliament that Germany should learn from its mistakes with the Turkish guest workers and seek to integrate asylum seekers from day one.
Since then, her government has focused on language and vocational training to help 1.2 million asylum seekers get into a labor-hungry market and wean them off Germany’s generous welfare system.
Under legislation approved in August last year, integration courses, including language learning, were made mandatory for all refugees and asylum seekers from countries such as Syria, Eritrea and Afghanistan.
The new rules also included a “give and take” clause giving authorities powers to cut financial aid to asylum seekers if they do not attend language courses.
The government speeded up work permits for asylum seekers and scrapped a rule under which Job Centers had to prove they could not find an EU citizen for a vacancy before they could offer it to a refugee.
There are several signs that the measures are working: About 203,000 migrants from Syria, Afghanistan, Iraq, Eritrea, Iran, Pakistan, Nigeria and Somalia were employed in May, according to the German Labor Agency, 23,000 more than in February.
“The employment numbers leave much to be desired,” Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development senior migration specialist Thomas Liebig said. “But clearly many of the measures that have been taken are in the right direction.”
INCENTIVES
The government is also offering financial incentives for companies that offer vocational traineeships to refugees and asylum seekers. This could amount to half a new recruit’s salary for a year.
More than 13,500 refugees are taking part in these schemes, which involve learning a profession at a technical college while at the same time gaining experience with a company.
While it is too early to say whether the program is a success in Germany, salary assistance schemes have boosted migrant employment rates in Scandinavia.
“Most of the refugees come from countries where they either study or work,” said Christina Mersch, who heads a government-funded project at the Association of German Chambers of Commerce and Industry called Companies Integrate Refugees. “So it’s difficult to explain to them that in Germany you can do both simultaneously.”
Germany suffers from labor shortages as its population ages. This bodes well for the largely low-skilled migrants given that sectors requiring unskilled labor such as catering and hospitality are growing fastest.
“In the last three years, 1.6 million positions were created in low-skilled sectors, 45 percent of which were jobs for which one requires no formal qualifications,” Bruecker said. “We don’t only need doctors and engineers.”
HERE TO STAY
Despite its integration push, Germany appears to be repeating one mistake it made with the guest workers in the 1960s. Last year it granted fewer applicants full refugee status, suggesting it is expecting some migrants to go home.
Temporary residence permits, rather than full refugee status, hamper integration, economists say, as this discourages companies from hiring people who might not remain in Germany.
In the first seven months of last year, more than three-quarters of Syrian applicants were granted full refugee status and just over one-fifth were given a one-year residence permit. Over the same period this year, only one-third of Syrians were granted full refugee status and six out of 10 got a temporary permit.
“The main mistake is that most refugees are being given temporary residency permits because of the false expectation that they would return,” Bruecker said.
“This could have fatal economic consequences. Why would firms invest in someone whose prospects to remain are uncertain?” he said.
About 90 percent of the new arrivals have said in surveys that they want to stay in Germany permanently.
The stricter asylum rules were quietly introduced last year after Merkel’s conservatives were punished in regional elections by Germans angry with her decision to welcome asylum seekers.
Voters backed the anti-immigrant Alternative for Germany (AfD), which is expected to enter the national parliament for the first time in a general election on Sept. 24.
Whether Germany’s integration strategy succeeds will depend largely on how many migrants arrive in the months and years after the election, in which Merkel is expected to win a fourth term.
“I don’t think Germany will fail,” Reiner Klingholz of the Berlin Institute for Population and Development said, adding that 116,000 asylum applications were filed in the first seven months of this year, well down on the crisis year of 2015.
However, “another dramatic surge in asylum arrivals may well overwhelm the system,” he said. “The first refugee crisis produced the AfD. A second one could bring down a government.”
Additional reporting by Daniel Felleiter
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath