Due to an operational error that affected CPC Corp, Taiwan’s (CPC) natural gas supply to Taiwan Power Co’s (Taipower) Datan Power Station late on Tuesday afternoon, large areas of Taiwan experienced power outages as Taipower restricted the electricity supply district by district throughout the nation.
It was not until 9:40pm that power was fully restored, after business owners had suspended their businesses, while others had been caught in elevators, production lines had been closed down and communication networks had been interrupted. The situation was reported by the news media, and opposition parties made a big fuss over it.
Minister of Economic Affairs Lee Chih-Kung (李世光) took political responsibility for the blackout and stepped down on Tuesday evening, while Premier Lin Chuan (林全) instructed the Ministry of Economic Affairs to launch a detailed investigation into the causes and to apportion responsibility, while President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) apologized to the public on behalf of the government.
On Wednesday afternoon, Tsai addressed a Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Central Standing Committee meeting, saying that “the power supply is not only a matter of living standards, it is also a matter of national security.”
Earlier this month, Taiwan experienced a power shortage after a transmission tower was toppled by a typhoon.
However, this time it was a flawed operation at a natural gas supply facility that disrupted the operations of an entire power station and exposed the whole nation, region by region, to emergency power supply.
The problem facing the nation is a vulnerable power system that can be paralyzed by natural disasters or human oversight. If the nation continues to face this problem in the wrong way, it will be facing a great systemic risk.
That the president addressed the issue in person is a sign of how much pressure the government has come under as a result of the power outage, in particular from businesses, a group that always pays particular attention to power shortages.
As for the cause of the power outage, CPC says that personnel from instrument equipment manufacturer Lumax International Corp did not switch the control system from automatic to manual while replacing components as standard operating procedures require, causing the system to malfunction and automatically close two electric valves, shutting off gas supplies.
Lumax, on the other hand, issued a long statement saying that its personnel were only helping with an installation at a metering station and that CPC personnel were in charge of the operation.
The Cabinet’s administrative investigation will have to find the cause — and passing the buck cannot be tolerated. An administrative investigation is not a witch hunt, nor is it a search for a scapegoat. Instead, it is a search for the devil hidden in the details.
If the CPC and Taipower are unable to resolve the systemic risk, it becomes even more urgent that Lin brings in an external committee to avoid departmentalism in connection with the inspection that he has requested of the power supply and transmission system.
“Green” energy and a nuclear-free homeland are two of the Tsai administration’s main goals.
However, during the energy transition period and in particular during summer when power demand is higher, perhaps it would be appropriate to consider keeping a moderate nuclear power reserve and improving nuclear power operational security, thereby maintaining a certain energy reserve and ensuring that the effects of any unforeseen emergency situation would not be too severe.
If that is not done and the government insists on a more distant goal, which in the meantime will mean power restrictions for all Taiwanese while the existing power stations remain unused, how will it be possible to improve the economy?
Furthermore, to avoid a situation where a single incident can affect the whole nation, a distributed power grid should quickly be created to spread the risk.
In just a few weeks, the nation has experienced power restrictions caused by a toppled transmission tower and a power plant being taken offline. These incidents have not only caused complaints from the general public, but have also eroded the willingness of businesses to invest.
It is worth celebrating that neither the big power outage on July 29, 1999, nor the recent power outage caused social unrest, a sign of Taiwan’s stability and maturity. The 1999 power outage occurred just after 11pm, and Tuesday’s incident occurred in the early evening; still, neither led to looting. Instead, there are many reports of people helping each other, which is an expression of the strength of Taiwanese, an internal soft power.
For many years, certain media outlets have been fond of reporting on confrontational issues and predicting Taiwan’s demise, while at the same time intentionally inflating China’s rise and embroidering its domestic corruption.
By comparison, it would appear as if Taiwan was falling behind, but the fact is that whether it was under the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) in 1999 or under the DPP today, Taiwan is up to the test.
It is indeed like Tsai said: Power supply is not only a matter of living standards, it is also a matter of national security.
When a major power outage occurs during times of peace, it is only a major incident, as it means that there is still time to address the exposed national security weakness.
An annual exercise directed by the National Security Council that took place early this month included safeguarding infrastructure facilities. If that was an exercise, this was the real thing.
Although the departments involved were prompt in their response, with the power supply being restored across the nation in five hours and the crisis management working as it should, it still would not have been possible to take preventive measures and move ahead of the enemy, which means that it was not quite a success. One could imagine that another similar crisis might break the confidence in Taiwan’s economy.
Tsai’s demand for a comprehensive review of all major infrastructure facilities and the formulation of a security plan should therefore be seen as part of war preparations. The only thing allowed is a success — failure is not an option.
Leaving this weakness unaddressed and open to enemy attack will have unthinkable consequences.
Translated by Perry Svensson
When Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) sits down with US President Donald Trump in Beijing on Thursday next week, Xi is unlikely to demand a dramatic public betrayal of Taiwan. He does not need to. Beijing’s preferred victory is smaller, quieter and in some ways far more dangerous: a subtle shift in American wording that appears technical, but carries major strategic meaning. The ask is simple: replace the longstanding US formulation that Washington “does not support Taiwan independence” with a harder one — that Washington “opposes” Taiwan independence. One word changes; a deterrence structure built over decades begins to shift.
Taipei is facing a severe rat infestation, and the city government is reportedly considering large-scale use of rodenticides as its primary control measure. However, this move could trigger an ecological disaster, including mass deaths of birds of prey. In the past, black kites, relatives of eagles, took more than three decades to return to the skies above the Taipei Basin. Taiwan’s black kite population was nearly wiped out by the combined effects of habitat destruction, pesticides and rodenticides. By 1992, fewer than 200 black kites remained on the island. Fortunately, thanks to more than 30 years of collective effort to preserve their remaining
After Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) met Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) in Beijing, most headlines referred to her as the leader of the opposition in Taiwan. Is she really, though? Being the chairwoman of the KMT does not automatically translate into being the leader of the opposition in the sense that most foreign readers would understand it. “Leader of the opposition” is a very British term. It applies to the Westminster system of parliamentary democracy, and to some extent, to other democracies. If you look at the UK right now, Conservative Party head Kemi Badenoch is
A Pale View of Hills, a movie released last year, follows the story of a Japanese woman from Nagasaki who moved to Britain in the 1950s with her British husband and daughter from a previous marriage. The daughter was born at a time when memories of the US atomic bombing of Nagasaki during World War II and anxiety over the effects of nuclear radiation still haunted the community. It is a reflection on the legacy of the local and national trauma of the bombing that ended the period of Japanese militarism. A central theme of the movie is the need, at
RSS