When Typhoon Nesat slammed into the nation late last month, a power transmission tower used by Ho-Ping Power Co toppled over, causing a drop of 1.3 gigawatts (GW) in Taiwan Power Co’s (Taipower) net peak capacity.
This is the equivalent of two generators at the Jinshan Nuclear Power Plant in New Taipei City’s Shihmen District (石門).
Erecting a temporary tower takes about 15 days and during that time, the seventh generator at the Taichung Power Plant experienced a failure and a tube broke at the first generator, further limiting the power supply.
As the Cabinet urged energy saving measures, opponents of energy saving and proponents of nuclear power took the opportunity to call for bringing back online the first generator at the Jinshan Nuclear Power Plant and the second generator at the Guosheng Nuclear Power Plant in New Taipei City’s Wanli District (萬里), while questioning the decision not to start the Longmen Nuclear Power Plant.
However, the problems caused by the natural disaster and generator failure are temporary, and they should not be solved by reviving nuclear power.
On June 2, repairs at the second generator at the Jinshan plant were moved forward because of the collapse of another transmission tower. By then, the first generator at the plant had been closed down for more than two years, the second generator at the Guosheng plant for more than a year and the first generator at the same plant for more than half a year, while the second generator at the Ma-anshan (馬鞍山) Nuclear Power Plant in Pingtung County had been closed for almost two months.
For a whole week until June 9, only a single reactor in all the nuclear power plants was running, but there was no power shortage. Today, half of the nuclear generators are in operation.
Nuclear power plants are also affected by natural disasters. During typhoons Xangsane in 2000 and Toraji in 2001, the sea water pumping stations at the Jinshan and Guosheng plants were blocked; during typhoons Haitang in 2005 and Sinlaku in 2008, the Longmen plant was flooded; during typhoons Maggie in 1999 and Dujuan in 2003, the Ma-anshan plant was tripped; during Typhoon Meranti last year, there was a fire in the airconditioning system at the same plant due to dampness; during Typhoon Dujuan in 2015, the main transformer at the Guosheng plant was destroyed; during typhoons Yancy in 2000 and Soulik in 2013, the Jinshan plant was tripped and during typhoons Soudelor in 2015 and Megi last year, the emergency generator at the same plant made an unplanned start of itself.
The nuclear power plants, which often have to resort to load shedding as a preventive measure during typhoons, are themselves potential victims of severe weather events and not the solution to energy supply shortages during typhoons.
An article in the January edition of Taipower’s monthly magazine about emergency repairs said: “The Hsinta Power Plant has been in operation for more than 30 years and, with time, the plumbing in the boilers gets old and deteriorates.”
Following the same reasoning, the nation’s three nuclear power plants have been in operation for more than 30 years, and so they should also be facing the same problems with aging and deteriorating equipment.
For example, there have been several fires at the Ma-anshan plant as a result of damage to aging pipes.
At the Mihama Nuclear Power Plant in Japan, four people died and seven were injured, and four people died at the Surry Nuclear Power Plant in the US, all because of problems caused by old and damaged pipes, but at a nuclear station, the consequences can be much more severe.
At the Longmen plant, which has never been started, project management has been inferior, several floods have led to rust and corrosion and even after it was closed, there have been problems with dampness.
Instead of continuing to keep it closed, it should be abandoned so that the money spent on the plant can be used to enhance energy saving measures.
The revival of high-risk nuclear power is not the solution to Taiwan’s energy problems. The only sustainable solution is to implement energy saving measures, improve energy management and gradually replace highly polluting energy generation with low-pollution energy sources.
The repair of the toppled transmission tower is almost completed, and the nation’s ability to make it through this unexpected shortage should be enough to prove that Taiwan is capable of realizing a nuclear-free society by relying on energy savings and management.
Tsai Ya-ying is a lawyer at the Wild at Heart Legal Defense Association.
Translated by Perry Svensson
The conflict in the Middle East has been disrupting financial markets, raising concerns about rising inflationary pressures and global economic growth. One market that some investors are particularly worried about has not been heavily covered in the news: the private credit market. Even before the joint US-Israeli attacks on Iran on Feb. 28, global capital markets had faced growing structural pressure — the deteriorating funding conditions in the private credit market. The private credit market is where companies borrow funds directly from nonbank financial institutions such as asset management companies, insurance companies and private lending platforms. Its popularity has risen since
The Donald Trump administration’s approach to China broadly, and to cross-Strait relations in particular, remains a conundrum. The 2025 US National Security Strategy prioritized the defense of Taiwan in a way that surprised some observers of the Trump administration: “Deterring a conflict over Taiwan, ideally by preserving military overmatch, is a priority.” Two months later, Taiwan went entirely unmentioned in the US National Defense Strategy, as did military overmatch vis-a-vis China, giving renewed cause for concern. How to interpret these varying statements remains an open question. In both documents, the Indo-Pacific is listed as a second priority behind homeland defense and
Every analyst watching Iran’s succession crisis is asking who would replace supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. Yet, the real question is whether China has learned enough from the Persian Gulf to survive a war over Taiwan. Beijing purchases roughly 90 percent of Iran’s exported crude — some 1.61 million barrels per day last year — and holds a US$400 billion, 25-year cooperation agreement binding it to Tehran’s stability. However, this is not simply the story of a patron protecting an investment. China has spent years engineering a sanctions-evasion architecture that was never really about Iran — it was about Taiwan. The
After “Operation Absolute Resolve” to capture former Venezuelan president Nicolas Maduro, the US joined Israel on Saturday last week in launching “Operation Epic Fury” to remove Iranian supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and his theocratic regime leadership team. The two blitzes are widely believed to be a prelude to US President Donald Trump changing the geopolitical landscape in the Indo-Pacific region, targeting China’s rise. In the National Security Strategic report released in December last year, the Trump administration made it clear that the US would focus on “restoring American pre-eminence in the Western hemisphere,” and “competing with China economically and militarily