Future Olympics can be built without taxpayer money or a single eviction but with pop-up arenas replacing grandiose new builds, according to the architect planning two of the next Games.
Bill Hanway, head of global sports for architectural and engineering giant AECOM, has masterminded the construction of the last two Games and is working in Tokyo on the 2020 Games and Los Angeles, which on Monday last week was announced as the 2028 host.
Hanway envisions a break from the major disruption of past Olympic developments, which Games watchdogs said displaced more than 2 million residents, sometimes violently, in the two decades between Seoul in 1988 and Beijing in 2008.
In an interview, Hanway set out a more sustainable Olympic future — one of community-backed masterplans, pop-up venues, renovated stadiums and modular handball courts that can be shipped to other cities or transformed into schools.
Hanway said the Los Angeles Games will rise to public demands and be economically viable, socially sensitive and environmentally sound.
“Everybody is aware of the damage that global sports are getting in terms of press, cost over-runs, corruption, doping,” Hanway said.
“People are losing sight, in some ways, of why we have the Games, and of the Olympic and athletes’ experience — the things that made the experience positive in the first place,” he said.
Last month, two cities, Paris and Los Angeles, were chosen as hosts for the next two Olympics as a pair, in an unprecedented move seen as a bid for stability at a time when interest from potential hosts is dwindling.
The only other cities left in the race — Boston, Hamburg, Rome and, most recently, Budapest — withdrew in the face of public opposition.
Massive price tags like the US$51 billion spent by Russia on the 2014 Sochi Winter Games and images of decaying white elephant venues from Rio de Janeiro last year have left cities and governments questioning the value of hosting an Olympics.
When the International Olympic Committee (IOC) met in June, president Thomas Bach asked organizers and planners how to make the bidding and hosting process more viable, said Hanway.
According to the IOC, the 2024 and 2028 Games will be the first to fully embrace its new sustainability drive and use a record number of temporary facilities.
Organizers for the Los Angeles Games say they will be entirely privately funded, relying heavily on ticket sales, upgrades to existing venues and corporate sponsorship.
“We’re not impacting a single residential location and not disrupting any businesses in our entire planning process for the [Los Angeles] Olympic Games,” Hanway said.
“Absolutely it’s possible to avoid any disruption on the scale that has historically been seen in the Olympic Games — that is certainly the approach that any bidding city would take in the future,” he said.
Securing local support was crucial for any prospective host, as shown by the referendum that ended Hamburg’s bid and demands for public votes that led Rome and Boston to withdraw their unpopular bids, Hanway said.
Organizers have a responsibility to show communities how the Games respond to their needs — be it for transport, sports facilities or schools — and to minimize the number of residents disenfranchised by any development.
“You listen first and then you start designing. That has to be the way forward … or you’ll never get community support,” he said.
That — and some architectural creativity.
Hanway said new construction techniques allow for temporary arenas, such as a 10,000-seat handball court in Rio, which was designed to be taken apart and converted into school buildings.
As for permanent venues, organizers must ensure their plans can respond to a changing economic situation, Hanway said, recalling the crashes that upended work in Brazil in 2014 and in London in 2008, during the global financial crisis.
Los Angeles claims it can put on a low-cost, environmentally sound Olympics because it already has the infrastructure.
The city, which hosted the 1984 Games, will use the residence halls of University of California, Los Angeles, as the Olympic village, cutting one of the top expenses.
“What you’re seeing now in the Games is that you don’t have to spend US$1 billion or US$2 billion to build a brand new neighborhood,” Hanway said.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath