They are doctors, academics, small business owners and stay-at-home parents; accountants, pensioners and IT consultants. They came to Britain from Germany, Greece, the Netherlands, Finland, Norway or France, some a few years ago, others decades earlier. Now they are leaving.
Their decisions are driven by both emotion — frustration, sorrow, anger — and hard-headed pragmatism: a conviction that, for all sorts of reasons, their families’ futures are now better secured on the continent than in Britain.
There are plenty of them: a request to talk on Plan B, a Facebook group, drew 40 responses in under an hour.
Illustration: Yusha
“The recruitment agency said it was quite scary, the number of applications they’re now getting from EU professionals in the UK,” said Alexandros, a senior academic healthcare researcher from Greece, who is moving to Frankfurt with his German wife, Heidi, a medical consultant, and their two young children.
“It’s difficult to exaggerate how sad and angry and disappointed we feel,” he said. “We came here as teenagers, thanks to free movement. We studied here, we met here, we’ve spent our whole adult lives here. We’d never thought of leaving. This was our home.”
According to the UK Office for National Statistics, 117,000 EU nationals left the UK last year, the year of the referendum — a 36 percent increase on 2015.
A recent Deloitte report suggested 47 percent of highly skilled EU27 workers in the UK were considering leaving in the next five years, uncertain about their prospects — and those of their adopted country — once Britain exits the union.
Alexandros and Heidi, who asked not to be fully identified because they have not yet told their UK employers they are leaving, had jobs within days of posting their CVs online.
After living in Britain, most recently in the northwest since 1995, both are to take up senior positions with a leading German hospital company, on more than double their UK salaries.
Their decision was made easier by the fact that stones were thrown through the windows of their house barely 24 hours after the referendum, and that their six-year-old daughter came home in tears after being told in the playground by a classmate that she would soon have to “go home.”
“I feel betrayed,” Alexandros said. “To have worked so hard here, done those 16-hour hospital shifts and be treated like this ... with spite. Made to feel you’re not valued, not wanted, not good enough for Britain. It breaks my heart, but I just want to go now. Whatever might happen, we wouldn’t stay.”
Betrayal is a word that comes up often.
“It’s hard not to take it personally,” said Elina Halonen, 37, a Finn who lived in the UK for 13 years, cofounding a specialist market research firm that now employs 10 people.
She moved to Amsterdam with her Scottish partner, Tane Piper, in February.
“I worked hard, paid my taxes — now it feels almost like an illusion,” she said. “Like we were never really welcome. It has all been ... dehumanizing. Insulting, actually.”
Equally keen to keep his EU rights and make sure they were not limiting their chances to live together, buy a home and start a family if they stayed in the UK, Piper pushed hardest for the move, which the couple made before Article 50 was triggered — in case that became a cut-off date.
Others are still packing up.
“It will be really hard, after 33 years,” said Hannelore Cossens, 51, a Dutch who will spend the summer house-hunting in the Netherlands and finding a school for her youngest child, 11.
She will be joined later by her husband, Peter, a retired IT specialist, once their house near Lampeter in Wales has been sold.
“Our income, my husband’s pension and our investments are in pounds and worth a lot less, but it’s worth it to me,” she said. “And my husband doesn’t like his country any more. Why would I stay, be made to feel like some faceless ‘migrant’? A bit of me is dying, but I can’t stay.”
For Sigrun Campbell, it is for the children. From Denmark, she has lived in the UK for 23 years and has three children with her husband, a “passionate remainer,” who will be abandoning a “very good job” in banking to move with the family to Copenhagen.
Campbell, who lives near Tunbridge Wells in England, said she knew of four other Anglo-EU couples leaving this summer: two more to Denmark, one to Lithuania and one to France.
“I can’t see it working for the kids here,” she said. “We, their parents, have lost faith in this country. I can’t see this being a great place for them to be.”
None of the dozen EU citizens interviewed for this article had previously applied for permanent residency in the UK — either because they thought they would be turned down owing to inadequate paperwork or because they simply did not see why they should have to.
Nor did the “generous” offer made to them last month by British Prime Minister Theresa May change their minds.
“Britain has changed,” said Michaela Aumuller, who after six years in Cornwall moved to Munster, Germany, in April with her British partner, Richard.
“Something has been broken. Neither of us wanted to put up with the new attitude to EU nationals. There were incidents, little things, but they make such a difference,” she said.
However, the main reason was because “we don’t see our relationship being protected by UK immigration law,” Aumuller said. “I’m self-supporting, I don’t have the paperwork, and if EU citizens’ rights ever become the same as non-EU citizens’ ... we couldn’t be together in the UK.”
Mel Scott, a French antenatal educator, has lived in Britain since 1998. She and her husband, Dan, are moving to Le Touquet, France, with their 10 and 11-year-old sons once their house near Crowborough in East Sussex is sold.
Dan will run his IT business from France, but “it will still be a huge wrench,” she said.
Like Ian Paterson, who hopes to join his Belgian wife Kristel, a social worker, and their nine-year-old son in Limburg, the Netherlands, in autumn, Scott has been on an “emotional roller coaster” since the Brexit vote.
“The time before June 23 looks like some kind of ideal world now,” Paterson, 58, said.
“What’s the best thing? You spend so much time trying to work it out,” he said. “Are house prices falling? How much will we have to live on? What if we decide to come back, what rights will Kristel have? Do these Brexiters ever consider how many ordinary people’s lives they have harmed?”
Brexit has even chased British couples from Britain.
Sara O’Hara, 44, and her partner, Doug, 41, moved to the Dordogne, France, with their six-year-old son — and registered Doug’s landscape gardening business there — just before Article 50 was triggered.
O’Hara, who has kept her job as environmental permits manager for a UK waste management firm in Dorset, said the decision had in effect been made the day after the referendum.
“We were both devastated, disappointed, really confused,” she said. “We had friends and family falling out.”
Their future, and that of their son, made the move inevitable, she said.
“The idea of him not being able to go wherever he wanted ... It’s not been easy, but we have no regrets,” she said.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath