The New Taipei City Government has urged fishermen to establish a “maritime litter task force,” one of a number of initiatives being developed by the central and local governments to combat the growing problem of marine debris.
Marine debris is a global problem. Beach clean-ups are a popular activity that has been going on for decades in Taiwan, but it seems to be that no sooner is rubbish cleared than it is quickly replaced by even more refuse.
Media reports of armies of litter pickers working tirelessly up and down the nation’s coastline and even on uninhabited islands has elevated the issue of marine debris in the public’s consciousness.
Regrettably, there is still insufficient information on the issue and the nation lacks effective measures to deal with the problem. The situation is actually far worse than many people imagine.
Part of the problem is we approach the issue of marine debris in the same way we approach other environmental issues: If we can see litter, we view it as evidence of a problem, but if we do not see any, we assume the water is clean.
In reality, we are only able to perceive 5 percent of the litter in our oceans; the remaining 95 percent is buried deep beneath the surface. It is this unseen volume of debris that poses the greatest threat to ocean wildlife, the marine food chain and the overall ecological system.
Statistics shows that the top five global contributors of plastic marine litter are Asian countries, and together they produce 60 percent of the plastic waste in the ocean. As their economies developed, Asian consumers became used to the convenience of a modern lifestyle, but without developing the practice of proper waste management.
In Asia, not all waste passes through official waste management systems and is often dumped illegally. As a result, waste is carried by wind and water, with a portion of it ending up in the ocean and continuing to drift further out to sea. Even if the waste is disposed of in a landfill, if the landfill is located near to a river, it is not difficult to imagine how during heavy rains and typhoons, the rubbish is washed out into the river and carried out to sea.
Although recycling does alleviate some of this problem, a majority of the recycling efforts in Asia is focused on recycling bottles, aluminum cans and other high-value, collectable items. Lower-value materials, such as plastic bags, are frequently filtered out of the recycling process, which means there is a chance they will end up in the ocean.
Excluding discarded fishing tackles, the majority of ocean waste is made up of normal consumer products.
The use of disposal food and drinks containers is a particularly acute problem in Asia. Businesses have developed ever more intricate and absurdly wasteful packaging for their products, which has exacerbated the problem.
While everyone accepts that we all bear a responsibility for this problem, whenever a serious effort is made to tackle the issue, the typical response is to heap all responsibility onto the producers or manufacturers.
It is easy to blame overpopulation for many environmental issues, but people have gradually realized that it is excessive consumerism and an insatiable appetite that are the real reason why the planet is under threat.
In a world of excessive growth and untrammeled consumerism, disposable products are taken as a matter of course. The rubbish crisis in Yunlin County is by no means a one-off incident. As the crisis in Taiwan builds into an even bigger problem, it is inevitable that an increasing amount of litter will find its way into the ocean.
Although the magnitude and complexity of the problem may cause many to lose hope, past experience teaches us ho humanity is able to rise to the challenge — like when it discovered in the late 1970s that chlorofluorocarbons were creating a hole in the ozone layer.
People are beginning to see evidence that the Earth’s ozone layer is closing; this alone should be sufficient cause for people not to lose hope and to continue along the path of pursuing a sustainable future.
The solution lies in demanding genuinely ethical products, finding ways to produce these products more efficiently and changing consumer habits.
While beach clean-up activities are an important part of the solution, there is a need to find a way to channel this hard-won enthusiasm, cement it in the minds of the public and use it modify the way the public thinks, change people’s habits and build a society that spontaneously encourages sustainable lifestyles.
As consumers, we have the ability to vote with our wallets, cut down on waste and refuse to purchase superfluous products.
Hua Jian is an associate professor of marine engineering at National Taiwan Ocean University.
Translated by Edward Jones
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath