British Prime Minister Theresa May’s surprising call for an early election — to be held on Thursday — rested on one calculation above all: defeating Jeremy Corbyn was a sure thing. Crushing the Labour leader was the goal.
Her Conservatives saw him as a shambolic joke — a “mutton-headed old mugwump” — who barely had the support of his own party.
However, what May’s strategists did not see coming was that the white-bearded Corbyn, 68, would grow on voters the more they saw him. And the more they saw of May on the campaign trail, the less she appealed.
Illustration: Angela Chen
“When he’s got a nice suit on and he’s there on the TV sofa, he doesn’t come across as an evil monster, he comes across as a normal bloke,” Anthony Wells, director of political polling at YouGov PLC, said in a telephone interview. “He’s not a central casting prime minister like David Cameron was — a pink-faced posh bloke — but a genuinely affable grandfatherly bloke, a bit absentminded, he forgets figures sometimes, but I think people can fit that into the image of a prime minister.”
While few people expect Corbyn to pull an upset and become the first prime minister in more than a century to sport a beard, his personal rating on “who would be the best prime minister” has doubled from 15 percent when May called the election on April 18 to 30 percent.
In London, he opened up a 17-point lead against her, an Evening Standard poll showed on Thursday last week.
“I do a lot of group hugs with lots of people,” Corbyn told a crowd of supporters in Basildon, east of London. “I love a group hug meself!”
Greeted with a standing ovation, Corbyn has relaxed in the closing stretch of the campaign.
At the rally, he attacked May’s claim that she is the best person to tackle Brexit talks. He unveiled a three-person team of negotiators and called the prime minister’s approach “reckless.”
His gains threaten May’s hopes of an “unassailable” majority, which she says would strengthen her hand in Brexit negotiations. After all, she ascended to 10 Downing Street to replace David Cameron after the referendum last year without having faced voters.
To be sure, Corbyn has been helped by May’s lackluster campaigning, particularly a U-turn on care for the elderly. Her decision to use the Manchester bombing, in which 22 people were killed, to attack the Labour leader’s security policies also appeared to backfire when a poll showed 46 percent of voters agreed with him that foreign interventions in Iraq, Libya and Afghanistan had made Britain less safe.
“Theresa May is a terrible campaigner. If she weren’t, we wouldn’t be here,” said Steven Fielding, professor of politics at the University of Nottingham. “She’s done as much as she can do to undermine her own campaign.”
May has switched to a more positive campaigning style, a move that reflects the failure of personal attacks on Corbyn. Veterans of Sadiq Khan’s victory in the London mayoral campaign last year say vitriol directed at him by the Conservatives simply galvanized his supporters.
Corbyn’s allies have long said that once people got to know him, they would start seeing him as a serious contender.
He won the Labour leadership against the odds and could do the same in the country, they said.
“Clearly the polls showed at the start that people had reservations about Jeremy, but the more people have seen of him, I think they’ve been pleasantly surprised,” said Bill Esterson, Labour’s small-business spokesman.
After seven years of Tory spending cuts, his back-to-the-future socialist-tinged message resonated as well. Corbyn advocates re-nationalizing the railways, scrapping university tuition fees and extending free childcare. He has drawn crowds of thousands to his rallies, boosting Labour’s support among students and young people.
Then there’s a soft-spoken modesty he projects.
“Did I ever set out in life to become prime minister?” he said on the couch of the BBC’s One Show. “No. I set out in life to try and change things and try and bring about greater justice in our society.”
The Conservatives still have a substantial advantage over Labour when it comes to which party is best placed to manage the economy, leading by 38 percent to 22 percent, according to a YouGov survey carried out on Tuesday and Wednesday last week.
Labour’s rating is up from a low of 13 percent in February and was unaffected by Corbyn’s inability to remember the cost of his £5.3 billion (US$6.8 billion) flagship childcare policy in a radio interview, according to the poll.
What is beyond dispute is that May began the campaign with a 20-point lead over Labour and now one YouGov survey on Thursday put her Tories just four points ahead of Labour.
Some of this might be due to Labour supporters “rallying to the leader” and “convincing themselves he’s not actually that bad,” Wells said.
In Britain’s electoral system, voters choose their local representative in the House of Commons, rather than voting directly for the prime minister and, as candidates knock on doors to canvass support, for some Corbyn is no longer enough of a deterrent to stop them backing Labour.
“I’ll probably vote Labour, not because I like Corbyn, but because I like the party and what they stand for,” Alison Bushell, 47, a former science teacher from north Wales, said in an interview.
For others, Corbyn and the people around him are still enough to put them off the party that they have backed all their lives.
“There’s something about him. He’s the type of person I wouldn’t trust,” said Godfrey Brewer, 76, a retired joiner from Stockton, who said he’ll probably switch from Labour to the Liberal Democrats.
Corbyn’s supporters look to the unexpected victories for US President Donald Trump and the “Leave” campaign in last year’s EU referendum as evidence polls can and will be confounded.
“Jeremy Corbyn has got a really good vision and does want to change the country for the better rather than lining the pockets of the rich,” said Stewart Platt, 29, from Newcastle, in northeast England, although he is not letting himself get carried away.
“It’s like watching England in the World Cup,” he said. “You know it’s not going to happen, but you want them anyway.”
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing