Many businesses complained when the New Taiwan dollar appreciated sharply in the first quarter of this year. The appreciation was primarily a result of the central bank’s new laissez-faire approach.
For a long time, the NT dollar has remained weak due to the central bank’s policy of maintaining a low exchange rate by buying US dollars to keep the NT dollar weak.
Therefore, the US government pressured Taiwan to refrain from intervening in the currency market. The NT dollar’s rise when the central bank relaxed its controls confirmed that the bank had been intervening and marked the beginning of a more normalized currency market.
A weak NT dollar is good for export-oriented companies and allows the central bank to profit greatly from the exchange-rate difference.
Nevertheless, the cost probably outweighs the benefits.
First, when the NT dollar is prevented from appreciating, Taiwanese traveling abroad, consumers buying imported products and businesses importing energy and raw materials all have to pay more.
The public should ask why they are being forced to pay more in NT dollars to subsidize export companies. This effectively means that the government is taking from the poor to help the rich.
Second, the weak NT dollar is one link in the nation’s low-cost, low-price, low-profit and low-salary model. If this model really were good for Taiwan’s industrial economy, the nation would not have fallen into a high-income trap and be struggling to upgrade its industry, nor would its GDP growth rate be hovering between 1 and 2 percent.
By buying US dollars with NT dollars of equivalent value, the central bank causes an inflow of capital into the market due to the monetary multiplier effect of high-powered money.
Although low interest rates are beneficial, they could also lead to speculation and other problems. While the central bank might not be the main culprit behind skyrocketing real-estate prices, it has definitely played a part in shaping an economy in which young people cannot afford to buy a home.
The depreciation of NT dollar assets has also made Taiwanese more inclined to invest in foreign assets.
Therefore, the financial account in the nation’s balance of payments shows a large long-term deficit.
The yuan-linked target redemption forward financial derivative that has caused a near-disaster is also connected to the low value of NT dollar assets.
By buying foreign currency to keep the NT dollar weak, the central bank has accumulated a huge foreign-exchange reserve. While Taiwan does need a large foreign-exchange reserve as it is not a member of the IMF, it is too large and rarely used.
With its huge foreign-exchange reserves, the central bank can control the market, contrary to what a liberal economy should be. By keeping the exchange rate low, the bank is also doing the job of financial officers at commercial businesses.
The nation must not isolate itself from the international community. For the industrial economy to grow, the government must take the exchange rate into consideration in its daily decisionmaking. Foreign-exchange markets should be free from unnecessary and unreasonable government intervention, allowing market forces to freely shape the economy.
Thanks to pressure from the US, the foreign-exchange market will from now on become more normalized. This has once again highlighted that when it comes to reform, the US is a respected ally that is helping the nation improve, just as it did when Taiwan moved from authoritarianism to democracy.
Lu Shih-hsiang is an adviser to the Taipei Times.
Translated by Tu Yu-an
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath