US Secretary of State Rex Tillerson on Saturday last week had some advice for Iran’s newly re-elected president. The Trump administration hopes Tehran “restores the rights of Iranians to freedom of speech, to freedom of organization, so that Iranians can live the life that they deserve,” he said.
As he offered his observation at a news conference, Tillerson stood next to Saudi Arabian Minister of Foreign Affairs Adel al-Jubeir, who represents a government that does not guarantee free speech or many other rights.
When Tillerson turned to leave, a reporter asked if he had anything to say about human rights in Saudi Arabia. The secretary departed without answering.
Illustration: Mountain Meople
US President Donald Trump’s visit to Saudi Arabia underscored the calculation he and his foreign policy advisers have made when it comes to questions of human rights around the world.
Trump and his team made clear they were willing to publicly overlook repression in places such as Saudi Arabia and other Persian Gulf states, whose leaders met last weekend — as long as they are allies in matters the president considers more important, namely security and economics.
To the president and his advisers, human rights concerns can be an impediment to the flow of commerce between countries and a barrier to beneficial partnerships for the US. In their view, trade equals jobs and prosperity, and concern about human rights too often backfires, getting in the way of efforts by the US government to increase all three.
As they see it, the big mistake that former US president Barack Obama made was to publicly shame countries rather than to first build working relationships based on common interests. Only then can a president privately raise human rights concerns, they have said.
Aides point to Trump’s success in persuading Egyptian President Abdel-Fattah al-Sisi to release a US aid worker.
“We are not here to lecture,” Trump said in a speech on Sunday. “We are not here to tell other people how to live, what to do, who to be or how to worship. Instead, we are here to offer partnership — based on shared interests and values — to pursue a better future for us all.”
Tillerson outlined the approach during a speech this month to US Department of State employees that distinguished between US values and interests.
“If we condition too heavily that others must adopt this value that we’ve come to over a long history of our own, it really creates obstacles to our ability to advance our national security interests, our economic interests,” Tillerson said.
“It doesn’t mean that we don’t advocate for and aspire to freedom, human dignity and the treatment of people the world over,” he said. “We do, but that doesn’t mean that’s the case in every situation.”
In Iran’s case, pushing on human rights is an easy decision, since the Trump administration sees little cost. Iran has emerged as one of the top two or three foreign adversaries of the new president, and he is not seeking economic or security ties with Tehran that could be jeopardized.
On the other hand, in Saudi Arabia Trump sees an economic partner and the anchor of a Sunni Arab alliance to counter Iranian influence in the region. He announced US$110 billion in arms sales to Saudi Arabia on Saturday, as well as billions of US dollars’ worth of business deals.
However, the Saudi Arabian human rights record is no better than Iran’s. By some measures, it is worse. Iran just completed an election for president, albeit a flawed one, for an office subordinate to the theocratic supreme leader.
Saudi Arabia is ruled by an absolute monarchy that does not meaningfully share power or even allow women to drive.
The latest human rights report produced by Tillerson’s own department mentions Saudi Arabia’s “restrictions on universal rights, such as freedom of expression, including on the Internet, and the freedoms of assembly, association, movement and religion,” as well as the country’s “pervasive gender discrimination.”
Raif Badawi, a writer, has been in prison since 2012 after starting a blog called Free Saudi Liberals Network.
Freedom House, an advocacy group based in Washington, ranks Saudi Arabia among the 11 least free nations in the world, giving the country a score of 10 out of 100 on its freedom index, less than Iran’s 17.
Some of the other countries whose leaders met with Trump on Sunday also have less-than-sterling human rights records, including Bahrain, Kuwait and Qatar.
“We are very glad that Secretary Tillerson called out Iran for its egregious failures to respect free speech and free association,” Freedom House president Michael Abramowitz said.
“We should be holding all countries in the region to account for such violations, including his hosts. Both Saudi Arabia and Iran are among the world’s most oppressive regimes when it comes to fundamental freedoms,” he added.
Trump is hardly the first president to view human rights through a selective lens. Obama and former US president George W. Bush often spoke of the importance of encouraging other governments to guarantee basic rights, but played down that message when it might have conflicted with other interests.
For instance, Obama negotiated an agreement with Iran to limit its nuclear program and reopened diplomatic relations with Cuba after more than a half-century without making human rights an impediment to a deal.
“US administrations’ overall stance on human rights — and not just Trump’s administration — is not one of principle,” said Mohammed al-Jasem, a prominent journalist in Kuwait who has been jailed and otherwise pressured by the government over the past 14 years. “At times, the support was strong enough to put an end to the human rights violations I was experiencing, while at other times, the US barely acknowledged them.”
Russian President Vladimir Putin in an interview last year indicated that he would not presume to tell them what to do at home.
“I don’t know that we have a right to lecture,” he said. “Just look about what’s happening with our country.”
A measure of Trump’s approach came on Sunday, when he delivered what aides have called the centerpiece speech of his trip at a ceremony in Riyadh to introduce a new center for combating extremism.
The goal was to suggest a way forward for nations that have served as incubators for radicalism to instead stand together against it, aides said.
“The speech is intended to unite the broader Muslim world against common enemies of all civilization and to demonstrate America’s commitment to our Muslim partners,” Trump’s national security adviser, Lieutenant General H.R. McMaster, said before leaving Washington.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath