When it comes to drunk-driving deaths, it seems that they almost always involve similar elements: A reckless drunk driver behind the wheel of a fancy car kills a diligent, socially disadvantaged young student or an older person who just happens to be in the wrong place at the wrong time.
One such tragedy occurred at dawn on Sunday, when an allegedly drunk 21-year-old driver of a BMW transporting three of his friends hit a 76-year-old female scooter rider in Tainan.
The four in the car suffered abrasions or fractures, which were very minor compared with the injuries sustained by the woman, whose body and scooter were reportedly ripped apart.
Local media reported that the driver had a blood alcohol level of 0.71 milligrams per liter (mg/L), nearly five times the legal limit of 0.15mg/L.
He reportedly had yet to sober up when he was taken to a nearby hospital for treatment of his injuries.
According to statistics from the National Police Agency, nearly 7,000 people were injured in alcohol-related road incidents last year, with a total of 156 either being killed on the spot or dying within 24 hours.
Those figures might seem daunting, but they have been worse: 9,691 people were injured and 352 killed in drunk-driving incidents in 2013, dropping to 9,056 injured and 248 killed in 2014 and to 8,061 hurt and 201 dead in 2015. The improvement was thanks in part to an amendment passed by the Legislative Yuan to the Road Traffic Management and Penalty Act (道路交通管理處罰條例) in March 2013.
The amendment increased the maximum penalty for driving under the influence (DUI) from NT$60,000 to NT$90,000. It also allows law enforcement to mete out the maximum fine for drivers who have been caught driving drunk more than twice in five years, or those who refuse to take a Breathalyzer test.
Despite the noticeable drop in serious accidents, many feel that more should be done to curb drunk driving, particularly as DUI recidivism rates remain high and some drivers have exploited a loophole, choosing to be fined for refusing a Breathalyzer test instead of risking being found driving with an alcohol level exceeding 0.25mg/L, which carries criminal charges.
Some local governments have instituted policies requiring repeat DUI offenders to work in morgues, helping to clean corpses as a way of educating them about the value of human life.
Late last month, a new amendment passed a legislative committee review. The bill seeks to increase penalties for drunk driving, including raising the minimum fine from NT$15,000 to NT$30,000, imposing a fine of as much as NT$12,000 for passengers in vehicles driven by a drunk driver and requiring repeat DUI offenders to use fluorescent license plates.
The effectiveness of such measures remains to be seen.
However, given that the young BMW driver’s friends either neglected or failed to talk him out of driving, the deterrent effect of the proposed fine for passengers remains questionable.
As a seemingly high percentage of drunk drivers come from well-off backgrounds, monetary penalties have apparently little effect. Meanwhile, the effectiveness of forcing drunk drivers to help with mortuary work or mandating the use of fluorescent license plates hinges on the assumption that repeat offenders can be reined in by morality or shame.
Perhaps a more practical approach would be to stop trusting the judgement of repeat offenders and put in place measures that could effectively prevent them from getting behind the wheel when drunk. Requiring repeat offenders to install a breath alcohol ignition interlock device in their vehicles — all 50 US states have laws allowing their imposition as an alternative form of punishment — might be a good place to start.
The image was oddly quiet. No speeches, no flags, no dramatic announcements — just a Chinese cargo ship cutting through arctic ice and arriving in Britain in October. The Istanbul Bridge completed a journey that once existed only in theory, shaving weeks off traditional shipping routes. On paper, it was a story about efficiency. In strategic terms, it was about timing. Much like politics, arriving early matters. Especially when the route, the rules and the traffic are still undefined. For years, global politics has trained us to watch the loud moments: warships in the Taiwan Strait, sanctions announced at news conferences, leaders trading
Eighty-seven percent of Taiwan’s energy supply this year came from burning fossil fuels, with more than 47 percent of that from gas-fired power generation. The figures attracted international attention since they were in October published in a Reuters report, which highlighted the fragility and structural challenges of Taiwan’s energy sector, accumulated through long-standing policy choices. The nation’s overreliance on natural gas is proving unstable and inadequate. The rising use of natural gas does not project an image of a Taiwan committed to a green energy transition; rather, it seems that Taiwan is attempting to patch up structural gaps in lieu of
The Executive Yuan and the Presidential Office on Monday announced that they would not countersign or promulgate the amendments to the Act Governing the Allocation of Government Revenues and Expenditures (財政收支劃分法) passed by the Legislative Yuan — a first in the nation’s history and the ultimate measure the central government could take to counter what it called an unconstitutional legislation. Since taking office last year, the legislature — dominated by the opposition alliance of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Taiwan People’s Party — has passed or proposed a slew of legislation that has stirred controversy and debate, such as extending
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators have twice blocked President William Lai’s (賴清德) special defense budget bill in the Procedure Committee, preventing it from entering discussion or review. Meanwhile, KMT Legislator Chen Yu-jen (陳玉珍) proposed amendments that would enable lawmakers to use budgets for their assistants at their own discretion — with no requirement for receipts, staff registers, upper or lower headcount limits, or usage restrictions — prompting protest from legislative assistants. After the new legislature convened in February, the KMT joined forces with the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) and, leveraging their slim majority, introduced bills that undermine the Constitution, disrupt constitutional
RSS