He has a lakeside villa valued at more than US$3 million, two Mercedes sedans in the garage, and a butler who fluffs his pillows and shines his shoes.
However, Liu Xiyu, a real-estate executive in Beijing, still lacks the convenience he says he most wants in life: A US green card.
Fed up with China’s rampant air pollution and the rigid school system his children endure, Liu last year pledged US$500,000 to a California housing development in hopes of obtaining a special visa for investors, known as EB-5, that would allow his family to spend more time in the US.
Now, US President Donald Trump’s vow to tighten immigration policies and new scrutiny after a series of fraud and abuse scandals have spurred thousands of Chinese applicants like Liu to seek a visa before more stringent requirements can be put in place.
Lawmakers were discussing the EB-5 program last week as they tried to reach a deal on the budget and avert a government shutdown.
“I’m trying to help America’s economy grow,” Liu, 47, said. “I don’t understand why anyone would be opposed.”
Wealthy Chinese families eager to move money out of China have rushed to obtain green cards through the EB-5 program in recent years.
Last year, three-quarters of the roughly 10,000 investor visas issued went to Chinese.
The program, sometimes referred to as a “golden visa,” has helped attract billions of US dollars of investment in hotels, highways, casinos and other projects in the US.
It has also prompted concerns about abuse, including a US$50 million fraud investigation in Los Angeles this month involving more than 100 people, including Chinese.
The program poses a dilemma for Trump, who has vowed to tighten immigration policies, but who is also eager to promote job creation.
Since taking office, he has sought better economic relations with China after assailing the country during the presidential campaign, and as businesspeople, Trump and his son-in-law and adviser, Jared Kushner, embraced the EB-5 program to help finance real-estate projects.
In China, many visa applicants hope that Trump will examine the issue from a business perspective.
They say they agree with the US president’s call for stricter immigration policies, but they have said he should focus on undocumented immigrants, not investors.
Li Jing, an entrepreneur from Beijing who applied for an investor visa two years ago, said it was unfair that the US permitted undocumented immigrants to live in the country, but turned away Chinese investors seeking visas through legal means.
Li invested US$500,000 in a highway project in Georgia, hoping to obtain a green card so she could join her son, who is studying at a military academy in the state.
She said a booming real-estate market in Chinese cities was making it easier for families to sell homes and use the money to invest.
“The most important thing is education for the kids,” she said. “Chinese parents are willing to spend anything. They’re trying to give the next generation the best they can provide.”
The EB-5 program, created in 1990, allows foreigners and their immediate relatives to apply for permanent residency in the US if they invest US$500,000 in projects that create at least 10 jobs in rural regions or areas with high unemployment. They can also become eligible by investing US$1 million in projects in other areas.
The program has been so popular that there is a backlog of more than 20,000 applications, resulting in delays of up to five years for green cards.
Still, many Chinese say they are willing to wait.
Wei Chi, 23, applied for an EB-5 visa two years ago after he was unable to secure a work visa through his employer. His parents in Guangzhou provided the US$500,000 he needed to qualify for the program, which he invested in a luxury apartment building in Washington.
“All I can do now is wait,” said Wei, a management consultant who lives in New York on a student visa.
Some US officials are more skeptical.
US Senator Dianne Feinstein, a Democrat, and US Senator Charles Grassley, a Republican, in January introduced legislation to eliminate the program, pointing to Ponzi schemes and high-profile cases of abuse.
Lawmakers have also raised concerns about inadequate background checks of investors.
Feinstein said the program suggested US citizenship was for sale.
“It is wrong to have a special pathway to citizenship for the wealthy while millions wait in line for visas,” she said in a statement.
Some US lawmakers are concerned that the EB-5 program favors big cities at the expense of rural regions — an argument that Trump might be sensitive to, analysts say, given his political support in those areas.
Rather than scrap the program, some have suggested raising the minimum amount required to invest, to US$1.35 million from the current threshold of US$500,000. Others support encouraging investment in rural areas by setting aside a block of visas for those who invest there.
The Trump administration has remained largely silent on the future of the program, though some analysts say that Trump might be supportive of it, given his background in real estate.
One of Kushner’s projects, a Trump-branded luxury apartment tower in Jersey City, received nearly a quarter of its financing, about US$50 million, from Chinese investors.
“It could be the one immigration program that they are willing to accept,” said Stephen Yale-Loehr, an immigration law professor at Cornell Law School. “If done correctly, it creates jobs for US workers.”
In anticipation of changes to the program under Trump, applications for investor visas in China have surged over the past several months, lawyers said.
The Chinese government, hoping to prevent a potentially destabilizing rush of money out of the country as the economy slows, has recently imposed strict currency controls. Still, investors in the EB-5 program have found ways around those rules, by using offshore accounts, for example.
“Many are motivated by the fear that this will be their last chance to get a better deal,” said Gu Ouwen, an immigration lawyer in Beijing.
Wealthy families also see the program as a way of shielding their assets from political winds in China, he added.
Liu said he would continue to wait for a visa, but he is worried about his 11-year-old son’s health and education in Beijing.
“If President Trump really wants to put America first, he has to let Chinese investors through the door,” he said.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath