The nation’s economic achievements were once internationally renowned, but economic growth has widened the ever-expanding gap between rich and poor.
The lack of a bicameral legislature, of effective supervision of the executive offices and of government oversight in balanced regional development has caused cities that once flourished economically to decline in administrative functionality simply because of their distance from the capital.
As young people migrate to Taipei with the promise of higher salaries, other cities continue to become more marginalized.
Take Pingtung for example: the nation’s southernmost city, which has seen a population reduction of 46,930 people since 2010. The political and economic center of Taipei has been unconcerned with the city at the island’s southern tip since the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) moved to Taiwan from China.
Pingtung has received proportionally far fewer national resources than other large cities. Many people in the city are concerned that it is becoming increasingly lethargic and that they might soon lose a legislative representative, which would reduce the say of Pingtung’s people in the Legislative Yuan.
In the absence of “economic human rights” and protection from the federal government under the constitutional system, the decline of Pingtung epitomizes the nation’s economic development.
It is unfortunate that this phenomenon has failed to garner the attention of the media, which are mostly located in Taipei, making Pingtung’s unbalanced development even more invisible to officials in the capital.
A group has filed a petition through the government petition platform for the high-speed railway to be extended to Pingtung (https://goo.gl/34qnUM).
The petition as of yesterday had been signed by 6,055 people, reaching the platform’s threshold within a week, whereas typically only about 4.7 percent of petitions are able to meet the requirements.
The strong voice of these people has gathered great interest and attention from Taiwanese. The Pingtung County commissioner, as well as several social activism groups, have echoed the petition’s call to raise awareness about the importance of communication construction in Pingtung.
Pingtung residents have come together on this issue, hoping for more balanced regional development and equality in economic rights. They believe that the government’s investment in communication infrastructure would be an important symbol of the government’s willingness to improve regional imbalance and economic inequality.
For decades, Taipei has been the prime subject of consideration for resources and government policies. It does not favor local industrial transformation and innovation when talent and resources are concentrated in metropolitan regions.
As most corporate headquarters and funds are concentrated in Taipei, other regions are forced to face population loss, lack of funding for infrastructure and fewer employment opportunities.
As the economies in these regions continue to suffer, the gap between rich and poor continues to increase. Such hardships would undoubtedly become long-term challenges for rural regions.
It is therefore all the more critical to come up with strategies to face these challenges, to eliminate domestic inequality and opposition, and to form alliances with other nations on the basis of the common goal of attaining regional balance and equal opportunity for all.
Myer Su is coordinator at the Alliance Promoting the Extension of the High-Speed Railway to Pingtung. Charles Lin is the alliance’s information technology section chief.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath