“‘Who rules here?’ I asked.
“They said: ‘The people, naturally.’
“I said: ‘Naturally the people, but who really rules?’”
This poem, titled “In the Capital,” is from a collection titled 100 Poems Without a Country by Erich Fried (1921-1988), a Jewish German-language poet who was born in Vienna and was exiled to London during World War II. It reminds me of a scene in real life.
During former Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) chairman Lin I-hsiung’s (林義雄) term as party chairman, Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) was elected president. Lin then withdrew from the party during Chen’s first term.
On Wednesday, the People Rule Foundation (人民作主基金會), in which Lin has been deeply involved, began a relay hunger strike in front of DPP headquarters in Taipei, which is set to continue until May 11.
Lin is also expected to participate in the hunger strike. The participants demand that the party pass an amendment to the Referendum Act (公民投票法) by May 20.
Who is ruling Taiwan at the moment: the DPP or the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT)?
The DPP is in complete control of the government, as it holds both the presidency and the legislative majority. This is an expression of the public expectation that the nation leave the one-party state behind once and for all and that the DPP help build a new nation.
As the party holds the legislative majority and President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) marks the first anniversary of her presidency, the question arises: What new policies and what renewal of the nation has the government introduced? Supporters of the DPP and Tsai have a right to place high expectations on them.
For example, take the proposed amendments to the Referendum Act. For the sake of Taiwan’s democratic development, it is necessary to break the restrictions of this “birdcage referendum act” and rely on direct democracy and referendums to strengthen the legislature — which continues to have its hands tied by the remnants of the party-state — and free Taiwan from the politics of old.
This is necessary to complement Taiwan’s democratic development, and a requirement for consolidating the democratic experience. As the majority party, the DPP must not betray public expectations.
Lin’s calls for a referendum on halting the Fourth Nuclear Power Plant project were not only about opposition to nuclear power, but also aimed at promoting people’s political right to hold referendums and be their own masters.
Allowing the right of initiative or referendum is not only a matter of sharing the power in a representative democracy, it also makes politics healthier and more complete.
Taiwan should follow other developed democracies that use referendums to grant people the right to be their own masters.
With the DPP in power, the Taiwanese are their own masters. This is the original goal of not only the party, but all Taiwanese who have tried to reform politics. After 38 years of the KMT’s martial law and one-party dictatorship, Taiwan’s democracy movement has come a long way.
However, we must understand that a nation belongs to its people: The DPP should mark the anniversary of Tsai’s presidency on May 20 by passing the amendments to the Referendum Act.
Lee Min-yung is a poet.
Translated by Eddy Chang
In the event of a war with China, Taiwan has some surprisingly tough defenses that could make it as difficult to tackle as a porcupine: A shoreline dotted with swamps, rocks and concrete barriers; conscription for all adult men; highways and airports that are built to double as hardened combat facilities. This porcupine has a soft underbelly, though, and the war in Iran is exposing it: energy. About 39,000 ships dock at Taiwan’s ports each year, more than the 30,000 that transit the Strait of Hormuz. About one-fifth of their inbound tonnage is coal, oil, refined fuels and liquefied natural gas (LNG),
On Monday, the day before Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) departed on her visit to China, the party released a promotional video titled “Only with peace can we ‘lie flat’” to highlight its desire to have peace across the Taiwan Strait. However, its use of the expression “lie flat” (tang ping, 躺平) drew sarcastic comments, with critics saying it sounded as if the party was “bowing down” to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). Amid the controversy over the opposition parties blocking proposed defense budgets, Cheng departed for China after receiving an invitation from the CCP, with a meeting with
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) is leading a delegation to China through Sunday. She is expected to meet with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) in Beijing tomorrow. That date coincides with the anniversary of the signing of the Taiwan Relations Act (TRA), which marked a cornerstone of Taiwan-US relations. Staging their meeting on this date makes it clear that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) intends to challenge the US and demonstrate its “authority” over Taiwan. Since the US severed official diplomatic relations with Taiwan in 1979, it has relied on the TRA as a legal basis for all
To counter the CCP’s escalating threats, Taiwan must build a national consensus and demonstrate the capability and the will to fight. The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) often leans on a seductive mantra to soften its threats, such as “Chinese do not kill Chinese.” The slogan is designed to frame territorial conquest (annexation) as a domestic family matter. A look at the historical ledger reveals a different truth. For the CCP, being labeled “family” has never been a guarantee of safety; it has been the primary prerequisite for state-sanctioned slaughter. From the forced starvation of 150,000 civilians at the Siege of Changchun