Britain is expected to radically overhaul agricultural policy after it leaves the EU and the bloc might have to make changes too when it loses Britain’s net contributions to the region’s farming budget.
For the first time in decades, farmers in Britain will have to fight for a slice of British government funds with departments such as health and education once Brussels hands over the purse strings for farming budgets to London.
Britain’s exit also spells trouble for EU farmers as the country puts more into the bloc’s Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) than it takes out, meaning subsides for farmers on the continent could also fall unless the funding gap is plugged.
British farmers have been shielded by a powerful farming lobby within Europe and benefit from EU subsidies, preferential trade deals and access to cheap seasonal labor, but they fear they will be losers on all three fronts in a post-Brexit world.
“The bloody-mindedness of the French or the Irish in standing up for agriculture was not just standing up for their farmers, but actually brought a good deal for us as well. Without them we are more vulnerable,” said Nigel Miller, who has a sheep and cattle farm near Galashiels in Scotland’s Borders region.
“The reality is, as a farmer, I don’t see the UK government expending a lot of negotiating capital to protect agriculture. Their main issue when they look for trade deals will be financial services, banking, etc,” Miller said.
Britain voted to leave the 28-nation EU in a referendum in June last year. It has two years to sort out the terms of the divorce before it comes into effect in March 2019.
In 2015, British farmers received 3.25 billion euros (US$3.5 billion at the current exchange rate) from the EU’s agriculture fund in direct payments based chiefly on the amount of land they farm, essentially a form of income support that does not take individual needs into account.
The government has guaranteed payments will be maintained until 2020, but British Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Andrea Leadsom in February said there would be a major policy overhaul when the EU subsidies stop.
On average, British farmers get about ￡15,000 (US$18,615) per year from direct payments and an EU rural development fund. For some, direct payments account for 70 percent of their income.
However, a significant chunk goes to wealthy individuals who own a lot of land.
An investigation by environmental lobby group Greenpeace showed that in 2015 the top 100 recipients of EU direct payments in Britain received more in total than the bottom 55,119 recipients combined.
Imperial College London policy analysis professor Berkeley Hill said any overhaul should ensure funds go to farmers making decisions that benefit the environment, or help them cope with disasters such as flooding or foot-and-mouth disease.
“It has the potential to be quite radical. What is the taxpayer getting in return for all this money? Most of it does not go to poor farmers,” Hill said.
Greenpeace campaigner Hannah Martin hopes the government will reshape Britain’s food and farming policy so payments are for the “common good,” rather than just rewarding landowners for owning land.
“That means, landowners getting the money are doing positive things like boosting rural economies, ensuring food production is genuinely sustainable, reducing flood-risk, maintaining healthy soils and protecting biodiversity,” she said.
Britain has about 18.4 million hectares of agricultural land of which more than half is classified as permanent grassland, according to government data for 2015.
Wheat is the leading arable crop with 1.8 million hectares, while others include barley, rapeseed, oats, rye, sugar beet and potatoes.
British farmers fear that in a post-Brexit world preferential trade deals could end, seasonal workers from the EU might find it harder to come to Britain and subsidies will stop.
The farm lobby has been a powerful force in Brussels, but has less influence in Britain where, according to European Commission data for 2014, agriculture accounts for 1.2 percent of employment, compared with an EU average of 4.7 percent.
A National Farmers Union survey late last year showed British farmers overall plan to reduce spending on machinery by 26 percent and cut investment in land by 31 percent over the next three years because of uncertainty caused by Brexit.
In budget terms, Britain will benefit from leaving the EU as it puts more into the bloc’s CAP than it gets out, but that does not necessarily mean farmers will be the ones to benefit.
“The moment you are putting payments to farmers up against the [British] National Health Service, care in the community, education... You can see it is going to take its share of cuts,” former union chief economist Sean Rickard said.
Farmers also worry that when it to comes to trade deals and EU market access, sectors such as financial services will be a much higher priority for the government, and any new EU trade tariffs could have a significant impact.
The EU is Britain’s most important trading partner for most agricultural sectors. In 2015 to last year, for example, about 80 percent of UK wheat exports went to the EU, mainly the Netherlands, Portugal and Spain.
There is also concern that new trading arrangements with countries outside the EU could leave farmers vulnerable to cheap imports from agricultural powerhouses such as Brazil and the US.
EU Commissioner for Agriculture and Rural Development Phil Hogan is in little doubt that British farmers will suffer following Brexit.
“If people want to go separate ways like the UK, there are going to be losers, and the big losers in the UK are going to be farmers,” Hogan told a media briefing last month.
For the EU, Britain’s departure will leave a significant funding gap that is already pitting countries with big farming sectors against major net contributors to the CAP, who are looking for ways to economize.
Trinity College professor of European agricultural policy Alan Matthews estimates there would have been a 3.1 billion euro hole in the CAP budget in 2015 without Britain, though the gap would have been significantly smaller in 2014.
In 2015, that shortfall would have been more than 5 percent of total EU spending on direct payments and rural development funds of 56.7 billion euros, and farmers in Europe are preparing to fight for their subsidies.
“If our calculations are right, it’s a 5 percent cut to the EU budget, so we can say it’s 5 percent less for the CAP budget. That’s the first challenge,” said Claude Cochonneau, a farmer in northwest France and president of a farming support network.
Spain and Bulgaria, both net beneficiaries of EU farm subsidies, are pushing for payments to be maintained, which would mean any shortfall would have to be made up elsewhere.
Pressure for EU farming budget cuts is more likely to come from large net contributors, such as Germany and Sweden.
“There should be less focus on current direct support and market measures,” Swedish Minister of Rural Affairs Sven-Erik Bucht said in an e-mailed response to questions about Sweden’s objectives in the next round of CAP talks.
Joachim Rukwied, president of German farming association DBV, said it supported a mix of increased national contributions and spending cuts elsewhere to cover the funding gap.
Analysts say that direct payments to EU farmers are likely to be maintained as part of the overall agricultural package, although there might be moves to link more funds to ensuring environmental benefits, a policy known as “greening” the CAP.
“Are we going to see fundamental reform, or some adjustments? For the moment the commission looks like it just wants to make adjustments to the current market approach, simplifying and greening,” said Bruce Ross, managing director at agri-consultants Ross Gordon Consultants in Brussels.
However, in Britain, farmers are bracing for a tough post-Brexit world, where some might not survive.
“There will always be people milking cows because we’ve got lots of grass and there will always be people growing crops — there just won’t be as many,” Rickard said.
Late last month, Beijing introduced changes to school curricula in the Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, requiring certain subjects to be taught in Mandarin rather than Mongolian. What is Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) seeking to gain from sending this message of pernicious intent? It is possible that he is attempting cultural genocide in Inner Mongolia, but does Xi also have the same plan for the democratic, independent nation of Mongolia? The controversy emerged with the announcement by the Inner Mongolia Education Bureau on Aug. 26 that first-grade elementary-school and junior-high students would in certain subjects start learning with Chinese-language textbooks, as
There are worrying signs that China is on the brink of a major food shortage, which might trigger a strategic contest over food security and push Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), already under intense pressure, toward drastic measures, potentially spelling trouble for Taiwan and the rest of the world. China has encountered a perfect storm of disasters this year. On top of disruption due to the COVID-19 pandemic, torrential rains have caused catastrophic flooding in the Yangtze River basin, China’s largest agricultural region. Floodwaters are estimated to have already destroyed the crops on 6 million hectares of farmland. The situation has been
In 1955, US general Benjamin Davis Jr, then-commander of the US’ 13th Air Force, drew a maritime demarcation line in the middle of the Taiwan Strait, known as the median line. Under pressure from the US, Taiwan and China entered into a tacit agreement not to cross the line. On July 9, 1999, then-president Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) described cross-strait relations as a “special state-to-state” relationship. In response, Beijing dispatched People’s Liberation Army (PLA) aircraft into the Taiwan Strait, crossing the median line for the first time since 1955. The PLA has begun to regularly traverse the line. On Sept. 18 and 19, it
Midday in Manhattan on Wednesday, September 16, was sunny and mild. Even with the pandemic’s “social distancing” it was a perfect day for “al fresco” dining with linen tablecloths and sidewalk potted palms outside one of New York City’s elegant restaurants. Two members of the press, outfitted with digital SLR cameras and voice recorders, were dispatched by The Associated Press to cover a rare outdoor diplomatic meeting on one of these New York streets. American diplomat Kelly Craft, Chief of the United States Mission to the United Nations, lunched in the open air with Taiwan’s ambassador-ranked representative in New York, James