Backed by China, North Korea’s Kim dynasty has long posed a military threat to South Korea. With help from the US, Seoul is deploying a Terminal High Altitude Area Defense (THAAD) anti-missile system, but China has retaliated by restricting imports of South Korean products.
Beijing has also punished the South’s Lotte Group for providing a site for the system, shutting down 55 Lotte Mart outlets. Chinese protesters holding Mao Zedong (毛澤東) posters threatened to vandalize Lotte outlets, while calling for a boycott of all South Korean goods.
Meanwhile, North Korean leader Kim Jong-un launched missiles two days in a row to show its support for Beijing.
China sent troops to help the Kim dynasty abuse Koreans more than 60 years ago. After World War II, it continued to support the North, which poses a security threat to the South. Following democratization, the Seoul government has tried to curry favor with China, hoping that Beijing could control the Kims.
Even so, China is trying to deprive South Korea of the right to defend itself, highlighting China’s “hoodlum” nature.
Faced with the threats of a “big” (China) and a “small” (North Korea) hoodlum, South Korea’s ruling and opposition camps, businesses and the media are united against the enemies, despite political chaos in the nation. The South Korean backbone is in sharp contrast to the “high-class Mainlanders” in Taiwan who were expelled by the Chinese in 1949.
Speaking of hoodlums, the Kim family outdoes China. While Kim openly acts like a hoodlum and fears no one, China acts like a hoodlum while pretending to be a gentleman, proposing “a new model for relations” with the US and demanding that the world recognize it as a full-fledged market economy.
It is clear that it was the Chinese government that stirred up the sentiment against the Lotte Mart outlets, but the Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs spokesman on Monday said that China welcomes all foreign companies, including from South Korea, to invest there.
On the eve of the Chinese Communist Party’s 18th National Congress in 2012, at which Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) took over the presidency, Beijing stirred up anti-Japanese sentiment. Now, it is repeating the trick against Seoul on the eve of the 19th National Congress, which is to take place later this year.
Taiwan might be the next target.
As Taiwan is the free world’s frontline against the invasive expansion of the hoodlum China, the US and other Western nations should offer all assistance they possibly can, just as they did when they sent UN forces in the Korean War.
The six-party talks that began in 2003 are a fraud created by China. They have yielded no results, while China and North Korea have grown militarily. Since then, Pyongyang has developed nuclear capability and test-launched long-range missiles.
China has always opposed UN sanctions as a way of dealing with the North’s provocations. Although the UN Security Council approved sanctions against Pyongyang last year, Beijing has taken to action. It was not until it came under pressure after Kim’s half-brother was assassinated that it said it was suspending coal imports from North Korea.
However, China has an overcapacity of coal, so this sanction is based purely on self-interests. What Beijing should do is to immediately stop supplying crude oil to North Korea to paralyze its military actions.
It is not enough for the US to simply flex its military muscle when dealing with a hoodlum like China. Perhaps the only solution is for Washington to give Beijing a lesson. The best argument for that is the fact that since the end of the Korean War, East Asia was at peace until the “rise” of China.
Paul Lin is a political commentator.
Translated by Eddy Chang
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing