One of the pillars of democracy is the freedom of expression, meaning everyone has the right to express their views, as well as the right to disagree.
However, when this freedom is exercised irresponsibly by failing to respect others’ rights, or worse, expressing oneself in ways that are intolerant, coupled with actions that make others fear reprisals, it becomes a different story.
This is what Taiwanese witnessed at the weekend.
Upon their arrival at Taiwan Taoyuan International Airport on Saturday morning to attend a political forum hosted by the New Power Party the following day, Hong Kong pro-democracy activist Joshua Wong (黃之鋒) and Hong Kong lawmakers Edward Yiu (姚松炎), Nathan Law (羅冠聰) and Eddie Chu (朱凱迪) were greeted with verbal abuse from hundreds of supporters of unification with China, including members of the Patriot Association (愛國同心會) and the China Unification Promotion Party (CUPP, 中華統一促進黨).
As the lawmakers walked through the airport, several people dressed in black and wearing masks broke through a police barricade and attempted to physically assault the visitors.
Intent to attack was confirmed by CUPP Vice Chairman Tseng Cheng-hsing (曾正星), who said the protest was intended to “intimidate” the Hong Kong activist and lawmakers, who advocate democracy and autonomy for Hong Kong.
It was not the first time Taiwanese have witnessed people associated with the Patriot Association using verbal and physical abuse against those with different political opinions. In November last year, there were at least two incidents in which Taiwanese tour guides and Japanese tourists were verbally abused by members of the Patriot Association outside Taipei 101.
Everybody has the right to freedom of expression and these associations have been exercising their right in public places such as near Taipei 101, waving the People’s Republic of China flag and handing out brochures.
They should be ashamed that they themselves enjoy freedom of expression, yet are intolerant of others’ expressions of freedom.
During the past two months, there have been frequent appearances of black-clad men at public hearings held by the government on the easing of bans on food imports from five Japanese prefectures, who created disturbances by interrupting proceedings and assaulting participants.
All these incidents have a common trait: the use of intimidation and violence against people with a differing opinion. They add up to a collective assault on the nation’s democracy.
A spate of “fake news” reports that government officials said could have been fabricated by Chinese netizens aiming to unnerve Taiwanese raises the question whether there is a plan to sow panic in Taiwan.
A nation of law and order that prides itself on its democratic achievements must not let incidents of this sort happen by allowing people — be they members of legally registered political groups or suspected gangsters — to use violence to oppress freedom of expression.
If the government does not come down hard on groups and individuals who espouse violence, the consequences could be severe, as frequent occurrences of this sort would harm the nation, undermining democracy and social stability.
Taiwan stands at the epicenter of a seismic shift that will determine the Indo-Pacific’s future security architecture. Whether deterrence prevails or collapses will reverberate far beyond the Taiwan Strait, fundamentally reshaping global power dynamics. The stakes could not be higher. Today, Taipei confronts an unprecedented convergence of threats from an increasingly muscular China that has intensified its multidimensional pressure campaign. Beijing’s strategy is comprehensive: military intimidation, diplomatic isolation, economic coercion, and sophisticated influence operations designed to fracture Taiwan’s democratic society from within. This challenge is magnified by Taiwan’s internal political divisions, which extend to fundamental questions about the island’s identity and future
The narrative surrounding Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s attendance at last week’s Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) summit — where he held hands with Russian President Vladimir Putin and chatted amiably with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) — was widely framed as a signal of Modi distancing himself from the US and edging closer to regional autocrats. It was depicted as Modi reacting to the levying of high US tariffs, burying the hatchet over border disputes with China, and heralding less engagement with the Quadrilateral Security dialogue (Quad) composed of the US, India, Japan and Australia. With Modi in China for the
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) has postponed its chairperson candidate registration for two weeks, and so far, nine people have announced their intention to run for chairperson, the most on record, with more expected to announce their campaign in the final days. On the evening of Aug. 23, shortly after seven KMT lawmakers survived recall votes, KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) announced he would step down and urged Taichung Mayor Lu Shiow-yen (盧秀燕) to step in and lead the party back to power. Lu immediately ruled herself out the following day, leaving the subject in question. In the days that followed, several
The Jamestown Foundation last week published an article exposing Beijing’s oil rigs and other potential dual-use platforms in waters near Pratas Island (Dongsha Island, 東沙島). China’s activities there resembled what they did in the East China Sea, inside the exclusive economic zones of Japan and South Korea, as well as with other South China Sea claimants. However, the most surprising element of the report was that the authors’ government contacts and Jamestown’s own evinced little awareness of China’s activities. That Beijing’s testing of Taiwanese (and its allies) situational awareness seemingly went unnoticed strongly suggests the need for more intelligence. Taiwan’s naval
RSS