If China wants to pick a fight with the US, the most vulnerable time for the US would be before the White House handover. However, China does not dare to actually pick a fight, so it is doing its best to be provocative to show that it is the boss and satisfy its own people’s vanity.
The most obvious action occurred in South China Sea, in the waters near Subic Bay in the Philippines, where it seized an underwater drone from right under the nose of a US surveillance vessel, despite warnings to stop.
The Chinese were very excited by this.
However, after US president-elect Donald Trump angrily said: “We should tell China that we don’t want the drone they stole back, let them keep it,” the vehicle was soon obediently returned to the US.
Following this incident, the Chinese aircraft carrier Liaoning entered the western Pacific through the Miyako Strait under the escort of a number of vessels, but instead of sailing east toward the US territory Guam, it took an immediate turn south along the east coast of Taiwan and then headed west into the South China Sea, using this “little trick” to intimidate Taiwan over the telephone call between Trump and President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文).
To intensify the threat, the Liaoning carried 15 Shenyang J-15 fighter aircraft. In general, an aircraft carrier can carry 70 to 100 aircraft, yet the Liaoning carried only 15.
Huang Dong (黃東), a military researcher based in Macau, said that there were traces implying that the numbers on the fuselage might have been altered, and that it might have been an attempt to inflate the number of aircraft — during an exercise after the fleet left the Bohai Sea, there were only 12 aircraft.
These acts cannot cover up China’s lack of confidence. The Chinese Central Economic Work Conference that closed last month set the goal for economic growth this year at 6.5 percent. However, a week later, Chinese media reported that Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) had made it clear that China’s economic growth rate could fall below 6.5 percent.
The media said it was a sign of Xi’s “open” mentality; but, it was, in fact, the fear that a trade war might ensue after Trump takes office.
In its attempts to alleviate the threat that Trump poses to China, Beijing has not only used its official media outlets to both threaten and entice the US president-elect, but it has also infiltrated foreign media outlets.
On Dec. 16, a new column named the New Sino-US Observations (中美新觀察) appeared in the China section of the Hong Kong newspaper Ming Pao. The first column was entitled “Russian alliance fraught with difficulty, suppressing China even more of a fantasy.”
Considering the importance of the commentary, it was surprising to see that it was not a signed piece and that the author’s name was only given as “Ming Bao reporter.” I immediately left a message stating that this was an official submission from Beijing. Beijing’s approach is for a Chinese official to send a “party article” like this to the owner of Ming Pao, who will then assign it to a subordinate for publication, thus disguising the opinion of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) as an “objective and neutral” Ming Bao report.
Probably because of my comment, beginning the next day, the New Sino-US Observations column has always carried the author’s name “Yu Mingzhong” (余明中), which could be read as “I am Ming Bao, I am China.”
The column is published daily, with the exception of weekends, and it is very likely that the articles are authored by the writing squad at the Chinese think tank Academy of Social Sciences, which has been instructed to turn public opinion against Trump.
The article published on Dec. 23 was entitled “Don’t think Trump is an ordinary businessman,” and it warned people to take Trump seriously. It also smeared Trump and tried to confuse the public by telling them how Trump, when he almost went bankrupt 20 years ago, sought help from Hong Kong businesspeople, and how the seeds of his hostility toward China was planted when his business ventures there failed repeatedly.
The column on Monday last week, which was entitled “Trump’s hard-line attitude toward China has academic background,” described the harsh confrontation between China and the US as an academic argument in a bid to reassure the public.
No matter what China does, it cannot hide the fear a paper tiger feels when it is faced with a real tiger.
Paul Lin is a political commentator.
Translated by Lin Lee-kai
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
RSS