Judging by the chorus of wails from domestic commentators following the election of Donald Trump as the next US president, people might think that Taiwan has once again been dumped by Washington.
Chinese-language newspapers China Times and United Daily News have been particularly vociferous in their calls for Taiwan to emulate the governments of the Philippines and Malaysia, who have cast aside their alliances with the US and jumped into bed with Beijing.
There is a difference though: the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has no desire to annex Malaysia and the Philippines, while it does have designs on Taiwan, hoping to turn it into another Hong Kong.
The question is, will President Tsai Ing-wen’s (蔡英文) administration follow the example of Zheng Keshuang (鄭克塽) — who in 1683 turned Taiwan over to the Qing Dynasty in return for a dukedom — and raise the white flag?
Trump’s election as US president by no means portends the beginning of a worsening Taiwan-US relationship, but quite the reverse — the relationship will be elevated.
While in Washington, I attended a seminar on how to further human rights through the US’ China policy. Attendees from the US Department of State included the assistant secretary of state for democracy, human rights and labor; the director of the Bureau of East Asian and Pacific Affairs; as well as many former assistant secretaries of state, ambassadors, representatives from Freedom House, Human Rights Watch and other international human rights organizations.
It was certainly the largest gathering for a high-level discussion of US policy toward China since the election.
Perhaps due to the imminent change of government, many of the high-ranking officials who took to the stage acknowledged that the US’ China policy during the administration of US President Barack Obama has “achieved nothing” and that the stagnating relationship will be changed by Trump’s administration.
Despite having attended a large number of discussion forums organized by governments, think tanks and universities, this is the first time I have heard high-level government officials dispense with the usual diplomatic parlance and openly speak their minds.
Most of the attendees were of the opinion that although Trump has yet to explain his Asia-Pacific policy, his administration will bring about significant change and that this has raised expectations.
Despite Trump having no foreign-policy experience to his name, his instincts might be able to help him, just as many years ago, then-US president Ronald Reagan relied on his own instincts to determine what course of action he should take, with results that proved superior to the painstaking calculations of professional diplomats.
At the seminar, veteran security specialist Richard Fontaine spoke up for the US’ Taiwan policy. Fontaine is president of the Washington-based Center for a New American Security think tank and has held positions within the US Department of State and Congress, in addition to serving as an adviser on foreign affairs to US Republican Senator John McCain and previously holding the position of adjunct professor at Georgetown University’s School of Foreign Service.
Fontaine, with a degree of introspection and righteous indignation, spoke of the US government having let down Taiwan.
Fontaine spoke of the US government’s Taiwan policy changing according to the whim of Beijing: A situation which invites self-inflicted humiliation on the US.
According to Fontaine, Obama has treated the dictatorship with far too much deference.
Under Obama, China has received the sort of deferential treatment that Soviet Russia could only dream of. In contrast, Taiwan is one of the most successfully democratized nations in Asia and it has established a model for peaceful transition in the Chinese-speaking world.
Fontaine said that Washington should give Taiwan more approval, respect and praise for its achievements and it should shift its preferential treatment from China to Taiwan.
Many of the academics and diplomats who attended the seminar said they had been appointed foreign policy consultants by the Trump team and cited this as a reason to believe that Trump intends to break through former US secretary of state Henry Kissinger’s doctrine, which has cast a shadow over the US’ Asia-Pacific policy for about half a century.
It was Kissinger who initiated the policy of establishing diplomatic relations with the CCP and after leaving office he has continued to retain influence within the Department of State as an aging shaman.
Kissinger, who has never visited Taiwan, once confided in a friend that “I would need to first run it past officials in Beijing.”
However, China’s leaders have not afforded Kissinger the respect he deserves: He was the last foreign visitor to meet with former politburo member Bo Xilai (薄熙來) prior to Bo’s fall from grace, which shows that leaders at the top of government in China had not revealed to Kissinger the information that Bo was about to be stripped of his power, and in doing so humiliated Kissinger.
Foreign-policy specialists at the seminar recommended that a Trump administration set into motion the formalization of diplomatic ties with Taiwan and treat the nation as it does Japan, South Korea, Indonesia, India, Singapore and other Asian nations, which have become part of the US’ new security framework for the region.
They said Trump should scorn the inevitable protest by Beijing and upgrade the US’ diplomatic relationship with Tsai and her Democratic Progressive Party administration.
Taiwan’s political parties should take on board this information coming from Washington.
If there is a breakthrough in diplomatic relations with the US, Taiwan would finally be able to break free from its invisible status on the international stage.
Yu Jie is an exiled Chinese dissident writer.
Translated by Edward Jones
Taiwan stands at the epicenter of a seismic shift that will determine the Indo-Pacific’s future security architecture. Whether deterrence prevails or collapses will reverberate far beyond the Taiwan Strait, fundamentally reshaping global power dynamics. The stakes could not be higher. Today, Taipei confronts an unprecedented convergence of threats from an increasingly muscular China that has intensified its multidimensional pressure campaign. Beijing’s strategy is comprehensive: military intimidation, diplomatic isolation, economic coercion, and sophisticated influence operations designed to fracture Taiwan’s democratic society from within. This challenge is magnified by Taiwan’s internal political divisions, which extend to fundamental questions about the island’s identity and future
The narrative surrounding Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s attendance at last week’s Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) summit — where he held hands with Russian President Vladimir Putin and chatted amiably with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) — was widely framed as a signal of Modi distancing himself from the US and edging closer to regional autocrats. It was depicted as Modi reacting to the levying of high US tariffs, burying the hatchet over border disputes with China, and heralding less engagement with the Quadrilateral Security dialogue (Quad) composed of the US, India, Japan and Australia. With Modi in China for the
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) has postponed its chairperson candidate registration for two weeks, and so far, nine people have announced their intention to run for chairperson, the most on record, with more expected to announce their campaign in the final days. On the evening of Aug. 23, shortly after seven KMT lawmakers survived recall votes, KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) announced he would step down and urged Taichung Mayor Lu Shiow-yen (盧秀燕) to step in and lead the party back to power. Lu immediately ruled herself out the following day, leaving the subject in question. In the days that followed, several
The Jamestown Foundation last week published an article exposing Beijing’s oil rigs and other potential dual-use platforms in waters near Pratas Island (Dongsha Island, 東沙島). China’s activities there resembled what they did in the East China Sea, inside the exclusive economic zones of Japan and South Korea, as well as with other South China Sea claimants. However, the most surprising element of the report was that the authors’ government contacts and Jamestown’s own evinced little awareness of China’s activities. That Beijing’s testing of Taiwanese (and its allies) situational awareness seemingly went unnoticed strongly suggests the need for more intelligence. Taiwan’s naval
RSS