The Islamic State group is using increasing numbers of women to evade security measures and spearhead a wave of attacks across Europe and the Islamic world as it loses territory in the Middle East.
Previously, female members of the Islamic State have been confined to support roles and kept away from the battlefield. However, this policy appears to have been reversed in the summer, as military pressure on the group’s main strongholds in Iraq, Syria and Libya intensified and substantial territory began to be lost.
Researchers said it is a “drastic U-turn.”
Illustration: Mountain People
Officials have repeatedly warned that the Islamic State would launch attacks as it retreated from earlier gains. Since August, a series of plots involving women have been uncovered by security authorities in Europe and north Africa.
The new tactic poses a challenge for security organizations which already have difficulty penetrating extremist networks and identifying potential attackers.
“It’s a concern ... There is constant evolution as the pressures on [the Islamic State] increase, so we are not complacent,” one Western European security official said.
A plot in Paris in September involving four women aged from 19 to 39 received significant media coverage. The cell, organized by a known Islamic State militant in France, was the first to be entirely female. Two of the women had been listed as potential security risks by French intelligence agencies after attempting to reach Syria to join the extremists. A third was recently married to a militant shot dead by police on the outskirts of Paris in June after he stabbed two police officials to death at their home.
“If at first it appeared that women were confined to family and domestic chores by the terrorist organization, it must be noted that this view is now completely outdated,” French prosecutor Francois Molins told reporters after the four were arrested.
However, a series of other plots around the world which involve women playing “combat” roles received less attention. In August, the Islamic State was reported to have deployed at least one female suicide bomber in Libya, while last month 10 alleged female attackers were arrested in Morocco. All were in their teens, had sworn allegiance to the Islamic State, and were in possession of bombmaking material, officials said.
The women, believed to have been planning a series of suicide attacks, “got in touch with [Islamic State] elements via the Internet and were brainwashed into committing destructive acts targeting ... tourist sites in particular,” said Abdelhak Khiame, who leads Morocco’s Central Bureau of Judicial Investigations. “This is the first time we have found a terrorist cell that was entirely composed of women. Terrorists are focusing [recruitment] efforts on minors who are female. That is very worrying for all of us. It’s an alarm bell.”
Women have long played a role in Muslim militancy, and have been deployed in frontline positions before. Palestinian groups have used women suicide attackers. So, too, have organizations in central Asia and the Caucasus. However, senior commanders of al-Qaeda, the extremist group responsible for the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, have consistently made clear its opposition to women taking part in combat activities, insisting that they should support male militants and the broader struggle, rather than physically take up arms themselves.
The ruling has not always been obeyed. Al-Qaeda’s own affiliate in Iraq deployed a female suicide bomber in 2005 to attack a hotel in Amman, Jordan. The decision prompted much criticism within extremist circles.
The Islamic State, which shares broad ideological objectives with al-Qaeda but differs dramatically over strategy and tactics, initially restricted the many thousands of female volunteers it attracted from Europe and the Muslim world to support activities.
“Thus far, ISIS has stifled the role of women in the ‘caliphate’ by limiting them to the house, ensuring they raise the next generation of jihadi militants and provide for their husbands,” said Rachel Bryson, of the Centre on Religion and Geopolitics in London, using an acronym for the Islamic State group.
There have been some exceptions: Female “lone wolf” attackers who attacked without official sanction from the group, and one major affiliate — Boko Haram in west Africa — which has systematically used young women as suicide attackers.
The recent change “would suggest the group is starting to heavily feel the pressure from the action taken against it,” Bryson said.
In recent months the Islamic State has lost significant ground in Libya, and its core territory in Iraq and Syria is now threatened. Offensives are now under way against the cities of Raqqa, the provincial center in Syria seen as the headquarters of the group, and Mosul, the biggest single urban center under Islamic State control and the seat of the “caliphate” declared by its leader, Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, more than two years ago.
As important as the loss of territory is the diminishing population under Islamic State authority. Although some revenue is earned from oil and other resources, most funds are raised through “taxation” of individuals, communities and businesses.
Analysts are split over the impact of military defeat on the Islamic State. Some believe the organization would be able to continue to attract support due to its past record of victories, with volunteers taking the view that it needs help now more than ever. Other believe that its appeal would be seriously weakened.
“As [the Islamic State] and others start to lose more ground, their pool of recruits will grow smaller, meaning that they’ll need more women to take up combat roles. Furthermore ISIS knows that the death of a woman evokes a larger response worldwide than that of a man, and for ISIS’ PR machine increasing the group’s media platform is an attractive prospect,” Bryson said.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath