Businessman and Republican US presidential candidate Donald Trump continues to trail former US secretary of state and Democratic US presidential candidate Hillary Rodham Clinton in national polls.
A well-known billionaire who never held public office, Trump has garnered supporters with a distinct brand of self-promotion and blunt language that contradict traditional political rhetoric and resonate strongly with potential voters.
Yet observers from both sides of the political divide have dismissed his candidacy as a “joke” for his outrageous and invective remarks, lack of a coherent governing philosophy, and superficial acquaintance with policy issues. How the US might address such a pernicious outburst of populism while retaining a belief in some form of political democracy is of concern not only for Americans, but also for observers and stakeholders around the world.
While the concept of democracy had its origins in ancient Greece, philosophers like Plato and Aristotle agreed that the rational part of the soul should rule over the irrational.
In The Republic, for example, Plato argues that the ideal city would most easily be realized if a king became a philosopher or a philosopher became king. This is because philosophers rule by reason and virtues and are free from the influences of false ideology.
In Nicomachean Ethics, on the other hand, Aristotle views reason as the key to the best human life. He contended that happiness can be achieved when one employs their best human capacities and engages in deep philosophical contemplation.
The rise of Trump and populism in this election cycle can be compared to Plato’s discussion of the sophists in The Republic. The sophist exploits his knowledge of the majority’s desires and dispositions and imparts that false knowledge as a formal philosophy. Hence people might understand populism as a doctrine that appeals to the prejudices of the general population in which the irrational part of the soul supersedes reason as a basis for political judgment.
In other words, populism clouds rational judgement and serves to weaken the function of existing systems and institutions designed to enforce order and promote the public interest. The perceived interests of a majority, possibly prejudiced by the charm and psychological domination of a leader like Trump, take over a society and its political rule.
Civic education can correct the prevalent populism in democratic politics. Education bolsters democracy by preparing people for life-long involvement and responsible leadership in political society.
In The Republic, the fundamental goal of education is to change people’s desires and turn them toward the pursuit of true happiness. Notably, the allegory of the cave illustrates the effects of education on citizenry, and everyone in the city travels as far out of the cave as education can take them.
Aristotle believed that the citizen should value reciprocity and act appropriately. Emphasizing civic education would thus reinforce liberal democratic institutions by enabling the citizenry and help them better identify leaders based on merit, which might include qualities such as knowledge, character and experience.
More participation and deliberation are necessary in US democracy. Certainly, a degree of passion and spirit is instrumental to a healthy political society.
However, as Plato and Aristotle would argue, the irrational tendencies should not supplant reason and principle in the formulation of public policies. Political activity should appreciate reason and promote the greater good. The development of a participatory and deliberative democracy would serve to encourage a more robust political culture and remove those conditions, which are the fertile soil in which the seeds of populism grow and develop.
As long as it stays within lawfully acceptable boundaries, Trump’s political expressions will continue to be protected as free speech. This underscores the significance of inclusion and tolerance long established in US democracy. Yet Trump’s populist candidacy remains a political dilemma, and his positions on issues like immigration, trade and strategic alliances present tremendous risks to the world order.
The US electorate will need to spell out exactly why decency and statesmanship are important to democracy and why a populist candidacy like Trump’s is harmful to the US and the world.
Alfred E. Tsai is a student at Columbia University, where he is studying economics and political science.
When US budget carrier Southwest Airlines last week announced a new partnership with China Airlines, Southwest’s social media were filled with comments from travelers excited by the new opportunity to visit China. Of course, China Airlines is not based in China, but in Taiwan, and the new partnership connects Taiwan Taoyuan International Airport with 30 cities across the US. At a time when China is increasing efforts on all fronts to falsely label Taiwan as “China” in all arenas, Taiwan does itself no favors by having its flagship carrier named China Airlines. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs is eager to jump at
In China, competition is fierce, and in many cases suppliers do not get paid on time. Rather than improving, the situation appears to be deteriorating. BYD Co, the world’s largest electric vehicle manufacturer by production volume, has gained notoriety for its harsh treatment of suppliers, raising concerns about the long-term sustainability. The case also highlights the decline of China’s business environment, and the growing risk of a cascading wave of corporate failures. BYD generally does not follow China’s Negotiable Instruments Law when settling payments with suppliers. Instead the company has created its own proprietary supply chain finance system called the “D-chain,” through which
Denmark has consistently defended Greenland in light of US President Donald Trump’s interests and has provided unwavering support to Ukraine during its war with Russia. Denmark can be proud of its clear support for peoples’ democratic right to determine their own future. However, this democratic ideal completely falls apart when it comes to Taiwan — and it raises important questions about Denmark’s commitment to supporting democracies. Taiwan lives under daily military threats from China, which seeks to take over Taiwan, by force if necessary — an annexation that only a very small minority in Taiwan supports. Denmark has given China a
Last month, two major diplomatic events unfolded in Southeast Asia that suggested subtle shifts in the region’s strategic landscape. The 46th ASEAN Summit and the inaugural ASEAN-Gulf-Cooperation Council (GCC)-China Trilateral Summit in Kuala Lumpur coincided with French President Emmanuel Macron’s high-profile visits to Vietnam, Indonesia and Singapore. Together, they highlighted ASEAN’s maturing global posture, deepening regional integration and China’s intensifying efforts to recalibrate its economic diplomacy amid uncertainties posed by the US. The ASEAN summit took place amid rising protectionist policies from the US, notably sweeping tariffs on goods from Cambodia, Laos and Vietnam, with duties as high as 49 percent.
RSS