Businessman and Republican US presidential candidate Donald Trump continues to trail former US secretary of state and Democratic US presidential candidate Hillary Rodham Clinton in national polls.
A well-known billionaire who never held public office, Trump has garnered supporters with a distinct brand of self-promotion and blunt language that contradict traditional political rhetoric and resonate strongly with potential voters.
Yet observers from both sides of the political divide have dismissed his candidacy as a “joke” for his outrageous and invective remarks, lack of a coherent governing philosophy, and superficial acquaintance with policy issues. How the US might address such a pernicious outburst of populism while retaining a belief in some form of political democracy is of concern not only for Americans, but also for observers and stakeholders around the world.
While the concept of democracy had its origins in ancient Greece, philosophers like Plato and Aristotle agreed that the rational part of the soul should rule over the irrational.
In The Republic, for example, Plato argues that the ideal city would most easily be realized if a king became a philosopher or a philosopher became king. This is because philosophers rule by reason and virtues and are free from the influences of false ideology.
In Nicomachean Ethics, on the other hand, Aristotle views reason as the key to the best human life. He contended that happiness can be achieved when one employs their best human capacities and engages in deep philosophical contemplation.
The rise of Trump and populism in this election cycle can be compared to Plato’s discussion of the sophists in The Republic. The sophist exploits his knowledge of the majority’s desires and dispositions and imparts that false knowledge as a formal philosophy. Hence people might understand populism as a doctrine that appeals to the prejudices of the general population in which the irrational part of the soul supersedes reason as a basis for political judgment.
In other words, populism clouds rational judgement and serves to weaken the function of existing systems and institutions designed to enforce order and promote the public interest. The perceived interests of a majority, possibly prejudiced by the charm and psychological domination of a leader like Trump, take over a society and its political rule.
Civic education can correct the prevalent populism in democratic politics. Education bolsters democracy by preparing people for life-long involvement and responsible leadership in political society.
In The Republic, the fundamental goal of education is to change people’s desires and turn them toward the pursuit of true happiness. Notably, the allegory of the cave illustrates the effects of education on citizenry, and everyone in the city travels as far out of the cave as education can take them.
Aristotle believed that the citizen should value reciprocity and act appropriately. Emphasizing civic education would thus reinforce liberal democratic institutions by enabling the citizenry and help them better identify leaders based on merit, which might include qualities such as knowledge, character and experience.
More participation and deliberation are necessary in US democracy. Certainly, a degree of passion and spirit is instrumental to a healthy political society.
However, as Plato and Aristotle would argue, the irrational tendencies should not supplant reason and principle in the formulation of public policies. Political activity should appreciate reason and promote the greater good. The development of a participatory and deliberative democracy would serve to encourage a more robust political culture and remove those conditions, which are the fertile soil in which the seeds of populism grow and develop.
As long as it stays within lawfully acceptable boundaries, Trump’s political expressions will continue to be protected as free speech. This underscores the significance of inclusion and tolerance long established in US democracy. Yet Trump’s populist candidacy remains a political dilemma, and his positions on issues like immigration, trade and strategic alliances present tremendous risks to the world order.
The US electorate will need to spell out exactly why decency and statesmanship are important to democracy and why a populist candidacy like Trump’s is harmful to the US and the world.
Alfred E. Tsai is a student at Columbia University, where he is studying economics and political science.
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) challenges and ignores the international rules-based order by violating Taiwanese airspace using a high-flying drone: This incident is a multi-layered challenge, including a lawfare challenge against the First Island Chain, the US, and the world. The People’s Liberation Army (PLA) defines lawfare as “controlling the enemy through the law or using the law to constrain the enemy.” Chen Yu-cheng (陳育正), an associate professor at the Graduate Institute of China Military Affairs Studies, at Taiwan’s Fu Hsing Kang College (National Defense University), argues the PLA uses lawfare to create a precedent and a new de facto legal
In the first year of his second term, US President Donald Trump continued to shake the foundations of the liberal international order to realize his “America first” policy. However, amid an atmosphere of uncertainty and unpredictability, the Trump administration brought some clarity to its policy toward Taiwan. As expected, bilateral trade emerged as a major priority for the new Trump administration. To secure a favorable trade deal with Taiwan, it adopted a two-pronged strategy: First, Trump accused Taiwan of “stealing” chip business from the US, indicating that if Taipei did not address Washington’s concerns in this strategic sector, it could revisit its Taiwan
Chile has elected a new government that has the opportunity to take a fresh look at some key aspects of foreign economic policy, mainly a greater focus on Asia, including Taiwan. Still, in the great scheme of things, Chile is a small nation in Latin America, compared with giants such as Brazil and Mexico, or other major markets such as Colombia and Argentina. So why should Taiwan pay much attention to the new administration? Because the victory of Chilean president-elect Jose Antonio Kast, a right-of-center politician, can be seen as confirming that the continent is undergoing one of its periodic political shifts,
Taiwan’s long-term care system has fallen into a structural paradox. Staffing shortages have led to a situation in which almost 20 percent of the about 110,000 beds in the care system are vacant, but new patient admissions remain closed. Although the government’s “Long-term Care 3.0” program has increased subsidies and sought to integrate medical and elderly care systems, strict staff-to-patient ratios, a narrow labor pipeline and rising inflation-driven costs have left many small to medium-sized care centers struggling. With nearly 20,000 beds forced to remain empty as a consequence, the issue is not isolated management failures, but a far more
RSS