The Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics has reported that “unfunded liabilities” in the pension programs for government employees — military personnel, civil servants and public school teachers — are estimated at NT$8.13 trillion (US$257.5 billion). The report caused discontent among representatives of government employees, who said that the agency should not impugn the groups. The issue involves several misunderstandings that need to be clarified.
First, unfunded pension liabilities are calculated by applying past data on the number of people currently receiving pensions, and refer to the current value of the government’s future payments for government employees’ past services.
For example, take a 45-year-old civil servant who has been insured for 20 years and plans to continue working for another 10 years before retiring. The government simply takes the future payments for the person’s past 20-year service into account when calculating unfunded liabilities, while excluding future payments for his planned 10-year service. This means that the figure is expected to continue growing.
Second, the calculation of unfunded pension liabilities does not assume that all government employees will live to be 100. Rather, the calculation is based on an average life expectancy of 80 years.
According to the Public Debt Act (公共債務法), the more than NT$5 trillion public debt does not include all types of unfunded liabilities — which are estimated to be as high as NT$18 trillion — because they are not contractual loans. Although they are not public debts in a legal sense, the government will still have to clear them, one by one, as time goes by, and it still has to raise the funds required to pay for them when the time comes.
For instance, the government allocates NT$77.8 billion annually to cover the 18 percent preferential interest rate on savings afforded government employees who began their service prior to 1995.
Another example is the 2005 amendment to Article 5 of the Civil Servant and Teacher Insurance Act (公教人員保險法), which requires the government to cover the pensions for government employees’ services before 1999.
In theory, unfunded pension liabilities can be amended through the legislative process. However, in reality it is very difficult for the government to cut pensions due to voter pressure. This means that it has to continue to raise funds to pay for the liabilities in installments, which inevitably crowds out other expenses. Financially, this process has almost the same effect as national debt.
Some remarks by government employees have been quite controversial, as they say that Taiwan would not go into default based on existing national assets and future tax revenue.
First, a nation’s national assets and foreign reserves belong to the public, and such resources should not be defined or monopolized by certain groups. All pension systems should be self-sufficient and should not leave any debt to future generations.
Next, the amount of unfunded pension liabilities is the present value — not the future value — of the future payment for accumulated years of service. Not only will it not generate any positive economic effect, it will also continue to grow.
Judging from the current political environment, future tax revenue might be insufficient to cover future administrative expenses. How will the government pay for unfunded pension liabilities under such circumstances? In addition to the massive national debt, how much more newly increased unfunded pension liabilities will the government have to pay?
In the past “demographic dividend” era — falling fertility rates leading to the labor force temporarily growing faster than the population that depends on it — the scale of hidden liabilities was not too big and it was tolerated by the public. However, as the population aged and liabilities rose rapidly, the scale of the liabilities has exceeded what the working population can support, and the problem that once seemed distant is now right in front of the nation.
Since there are too many people and too few resources, the government has less and less space to deal with the issue. Meanwhile, the global economy has been slowing down. In the face of the aging population, the problem has gradually expanded from a social phenomenon to a financial predicament. Essentially, “cooperation between generations” has turned into “deprivation between generations,” while sowing the seeds of division and conflict between the current and future generations.
Faced with the unavoidable trend toward an aging population and financial difficulties, the nation’s pension systems have come to a historic turning point, as various pension programs are likely to undergo a crisis within the next 15 years.
Even if the nation does not go into default, it will find itself in an awkward situation more similar to that of a credit card debtor. Pension reform is crucial not only to the retired life of the current generation, but also to the survival and economic well-being of the next generation. People should put aside narrow selfishness and think about the nation.
James Lin is a fellow of the Society of Actuaries in the US.
Translated by Eddy Chang
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing