As someone who was born in Hangzhou in China’s Zhejiang Province, I am sickened by the incident involving Taiwanese director Leon Dai (戴立忍) — who apologized to China after being accused of supporting Taiwanese independence — as well as an earlier incident involving Taiwanese K-pop singer Chou Tzu-yu (周子瑜).
I moved to Taiwan with my parents as a child 68 years ago and I have grown up, studied and worked here ever since. My father passed away here; I consider myself Taiwanese.
My mother and sister have lived in the US for decades and so they have become Americans. They often go to China on sight-seeing trips or to visit friends, and they are well-versed in one of the Zhejiang dialects as well as in Cantonese and the Shanghai language, Hu (滬), but that by no means implies that they are People’s Republic of China (PRC) Chinese.
Beijing officials have welcomed their visits and received them many times, but as far as I know, they have never been asked to openly declare that they are not “US imperialists” — instead, they have been asked to support China by making more investments in the country and helping promote its national image.
Taiwan is a free, democratic and diverse society where the people are the masters. After three transitions of government, where the public have elected their own president and parliament, more than 84 percent of the population now say that they are Taiwanese, according to public opinion polls.
What does that tell us? A nation and a people are not the same.
Regardless of their ethnicity, people have the freedom to build their own nation and government. The US, for example, is a melting pot of ethnicities. US President Barrack Obama does not forget his identity as an American just because he is also of Kenyan ancestry. A person from Singapore might have their roots in Fujian Province or Guangdong Province, but they still call themselves Singaporean rather than Chinese.
In the UK, there is England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland. Despite their shared Anglo-Saxon heritage (sic), they can all pursue their own independence and, as a natural result, there have been separations and unions.
It is just as it says in the Romance of the Three Kingdoms (三國演義), things always break apart after having been united for too long. In contrast, the Chinese Communist Party is still playing the race card, not understanding that they have gone too far.
A look at the Han position in Chinese history shows that from the Han Dynasty through the Tang, Song, Yuan and Ming dynasties and up to the Qing Dynasty, they have sworn allegiance to different states at different times: to the Mongol emperors of the Yuan Dynasty and the Manchus of the Qing Dynasty.
The Taiwanese are the Taiwanese of the Republic of China, not the Taiwanese of the PRC — the two are completely different entities.
Unless China were to occupy Taiwan, Taiwanese will always be Taiwanese. Compelling Dai to call himself Chinese or to declare that he does not support Taiwanese independence is ridiculous. Anyone who thinks that Dai’s statement could divide Taiwanese is simply unable to see the reality. History has inexhaustible examples of such mistakes.
In today’s world, democracy and freedom are universally celebrated values. When a big power tries to annex a smaller nation by force, the international community does not stand idly by. Even in China, there is the old saying that a national leader should lead not by force, but by establishing a moral example, which is the only way a leader can garner universal support.
When a government relies on rule by brutal force or annexes other countries, it ends in collapse, such as Nazi Germany, or imploding the way the Soviet Union did. Countries such as Poland, Ukraine, Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania no longer consider themselves members of the Soviet Union and their inhabitants are far from being Russians. China playing the race card is not only awkward but disgusting. It is nothing but an international joke.
While China has established Confucian institutes around the world, it does not seem to understand Confucius’ positions on benevolence or treating others as you would like to be treated yourself. It might just as well quit talking about “the rise of China as a great power,” as that is not only laughable, but pitiable.
Lu I-ming is the former publisher and president of the Taiwan Shin Sheng Daily News.
Translated by Tu Yu-an
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath